Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, 8950 Villa La Jolla Drive Suite C101, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Apr;48(5):1237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.024. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
Understanding the underlying qualitative features of memory deficits in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can provide critical information for early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study sought to investigate the utility of both learning and retention measures in (a) the diagnosis of MCI, (b) predicting progression to AD, and (c) examining their underlying brain morphometric correlates. A total of 607 participants were assigned to three MCI groups (high learning-low retention; low learning-high retention; low learning-low retention) and one control group (high learning-high retention) based on scores above or below a 1.5 SD cutoff on learning and retention indices of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Our results demonstrated that MCI individuals with predominantly a learning deficit showed a widespread pattern of gray matter loss at baseline, whereas individuals with a retention deficit showed more focal gray matter loss. Moreover, either learning or retention measures provided good predictive value for longitudinal clinical outcome over two years, although impaired learning had modestly better predictive power than impaired retention. As expected, impairments in both measures provided the best predictive power. Thus, the conventional practice of relying solely on the use of delayed recall or retention measures in studies of amnestic MCI misses an important subset of older adults at risk of developing AD. Overall, our results highlight the importance of including learning measures in addition to retention measures when making a diagnosis of MCI and for predicting clinical outcome.
了解轻度认知障碍(MCI)中记忆缺陷的潜在定性特征可以为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的早期检测提供关键信息。本研究旨在探讨学习和保持测量在以下方面的应用:(a)MCI 的诊断,(b)预测向 AD 的进展,以及(c)检查其潜在的脑形态计量学相关性。共有 607 名参与者根据 Rey 听觉言语学习测试的学习和保持指数的分数高于或低于 1.5 个标准差,分为三个 MCI 组(学习好保持差;学习差保持好;学习差保持差)和一个对照组(学习好保持好)。我们的研究结果表明,以学习缺陷为主的 MCI 个体在基线时表现出广泛的灰质丢失模式,而保留缺陷的个体则表现出更集中的灰质丢失。此外,无论是学习还是保留测量,在两年的纵向临床结果中都提供了良好的预测价值,尽管学习受损的预测能力略优于保留受损。正如预期的那样,两种措施的损伤都提供了最佳的预测能力。因此,在遗忘性 MCI 的研究中,仅仅依靠延迟回忆或保留测量的传统做法会遗漏一组重要的有患 AD 风险的老年人。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了在 MCI 的诊断中,除了保留测量外,还应包括学习测量,以预测临床结果。