University of Texas School of Public Health, Dallas Regional Campus, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Nov;25(11):1986-2009. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354497. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
This article examines the association between neighborhood characteristics at the census tract-level, couples' perceived neighborhood social cohesion and informal social control, and male-to-female (MFPV) and female-to-male (FMPV) partner violence in the United States. Data come from a second wave of interviews (2000) with a national sample of couples 18 years of age and older who were first interviewed in 1995. The path analysis shows that poverty is associated with perceived social cohesion and perceived social control as hypothesized. However, there is no significant mediation effect for social control or social cohesion on any type of violence. In the path analysis, Black ethnicity is associated with social cohesion, which is associated with MFPV. Intimate partner violence (IPV), as a form of domestic violence, may not be as concentrated in high-poverty neighborhoods as criminal violence. IPV may be more determined by personal and dyadic characteristics than criminal violence.
本文探讨了美国的邻里特征(按普查地段划分)、夫妻感知的邻里社会凝聚力和非正式社会控制与男女间(MPFV)和女男间(FMVP)伴侣暴力之间的关系。数据来自于对全国范围内年龄在 18 岁及以上的夫妻样本的第二次访谈(2000 年),这些夫妻在 1995 年首次接受了访谈。路径分析表明,正如假设的那样,贫困与感知到的社会凝聚力和社会控制有关。然而,社会控制或社会凝聚力对任何类型的暴力都没有显著的中介效应。在路径分析中,黑人种族与社会凝聚力有关,而社会凝聚力又与 MPFV 有关。亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)作为一种家庭暴力形式,可能不像犯罪暴力那样集中在高贫困社区。IPV 可能更多地取决于个人和夫妻双方的特征,而不是犯罪暴力。