Suppr超能文献

基于三维超声心动图的一种用于快速准确量化左心室容积的新型自动边界检测算法的验证

Validation of a novel automated border-detection algorithm for rapid and accurate quantitation of left ventricular volumes based on three-dimensional echocardiography.

作者信息

Muraru Denisa, Badano Luigi P, Piccoli Gianluca, Gianfagna Pasquale, Del Mestre Lorenzo, Ermacora Davide, Proclemer Alessandro

机构信息

Professor Dr C.C. Iliescu Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Sos. Fundeni, 258, Sector 2, 022322 Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 May;11(4):359-68. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep217. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

Abstract

AIMS

To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of a novel automated software for left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) measurements using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 103 patients with a wide range of LV volumes were analyzed with both 4D AutoLVQ and 4D TomTec software. In 23 patients, a side-by-side comparison of LV volume and EF measurements was done between 3DE, 2DE, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Excellent correlation was found between 4D AutoLVQ and 4D TomTec [r = 0.98 for end-diastolic volume (EDV), 0.99 for end-systolic volume (ESV), and 0.97 for EF, P < 0.0001], with small biases and narrow limits of agreement: EDV 5.2 mL (-14 to 25 mL), ESV 2.9 mL (-10 to 16 mL), EF -0.2% (-7 to 6%). Time of analysis was halved using 4D AutoLVQ with manual correction (1 min 52 s+/- 30 s) in comparison with 4D TomTec software (3 min 46 s +/- 1 min 24 s). Both softwares showed similar accuracy in comparison with CMR (4D AutoLVQ biases -11.0 mL, -9.1 mL, and 2.9%; 4D TomTec biases -8.3 mL, -7.4 mL, and 2.8% for EDV, ESV, and EF, respectively, P = NS for all) and good reproducibility.

CONCLUSION

Novel 4D AutoLVQ software showed very good agreement with more time-consuming 4D TomTec software, having similar accuracy against CMR.

摘要

目的

使用实时三维超声心动图(3DE)评估一种用于测量左心室(LV)容积和射血分数(EF)的新型自动化软件的准确性和可重复性。

方法与结果

共有103例LV容积范围广泛的患者接受了4D AutoLVQ和4D TomTec软件分析。在23例患者中,对3DE、2DE和心脏磁共振成像(CMR)之间的LV容积和EF测量进行了并排比较。4D AutoLVQ和4D TomTec之间发现了极好的相关性[舒张末期容积(EDV)r = 0.98,收缩末期容积(ESV)r = 0.99,EF r = 0.97,P < 0.0001],偏差小且一致性界限窄:EDV为5.2 mL(-14至25 mL),ESV为2.9 mL(-10至16 mL),EF为-0.2%(-7至6%)。与4D TomTec软件(3分46秒±1分24秒)相比,使用4D AutoLVQ并进行手动校正时分析时间减半(1分52秒±30秒)。与CMR相比,两种软件均显示出相似的准确性(4D AutoLVQ偏差分别为-11.0 mL、-9.1 mL和2.9%;4D TomTec偏差分别为-8.3 mL、-7.4 mL和2.8%,EDV、ESV和EF的P值均为无显著性差异)且具有良好的可重复性。

结论

新型4D AutoLVQ软件与耗时更长的4D TomTec软件显示出非常好的一致性,与CMR相比具有相似的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验