• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving inpatients' identification of their doctors: use of FACE cards.提高住院患者对其医生的辨识度:使用面部识别卡。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Dec;35(12):613-9. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35086-2.
2
Education Research: Physician identification and patient satisfaction on an academic neurology inpatient service.教育研究:在学术神经内科住院服务中医生的识别和患者满意度。
Neurology. 2018 Feb 13;90(7):e632-e636. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004961. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
3
Patient satisfaction associated with correct identification of physician's photographs.患者满意度与医生照片的正确识别相关。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 Jun;76(6):604-8. doi: 10.4065/76.6.604.
4
Doctor Who? A Quality Improvement Project to Assess and Improve Patients' Knowledge of Their Inpatient Physicians.《神秘博士?一项评估并提高患者对其住院医师了解程度的质量改进项目》
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):197-201. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00067.1.
5
Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience.我们能谈谈吗?社区医院中关于预立医疗指示的住院患者讨论。主治医生的态度、住院患者的意愿及报告的经历。
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2299-308.
6
Analysis of Patient Handoff Between Providers at a Tertiary Urban Medical Center.三级城市医疗中心医护人员间患者交接情况分析
Kans J Med. 2021 Aug 4;14(2):192-196. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol1415170. eCollection 2021.
7
PHACES (Photographs of Academic Clinicians and Their Educational Status): a tool to improve delivery of family-centered care.PHACES(学术临床医生及其教育状况的照片):改善以家庭为中心的护理服务的工具。
Acad Pediatr. 2010 Mar-Apr;10(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2009.12.006.
8
[Inpatients' opinion on quality of health care].[住院患者对医疗保健质量的看法]
Medicina (Kaunas). 2009;45(3):226-37.
9
Improving patients' ability to identify their physicians through the use of physician facecards and whiteboards.通过使用医生名片和白板提高患者识别其医生的能力。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Apr 29;8(2):e000606. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000606. eCollection 2019.
10
Patient Perceptions of Whom is Most Involved in Their Care with Successive Duty Hour Limits.患者对在连续工作时间限制下谁最参与其护理的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Sep;30(9):1275-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3239-0.

引用本文的文献

1
'They Were Talking to Each Other but Not to Me': Examining the Drivers of Patients' Poor Experiences During the Transition From the Hospital to Skilled Nursing Facility.“他们彼此交谈却不与我交流”:探究患者从医院转至专业护理机构期间体验不佳的驱动因素
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70248. doi: 10.1111/hex.70248.
2
Letter to the Editor: Inpatient Understanding of Their Care Team and Receipt of Mixed Messages: A Two-Site Cross-Sectional Study.致编辑的信:住院患者对其护理团队的理解以及收到的混合信息:一项双地点横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(10):1943. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08600-x. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
3
The Effect of Standardized Hospitalist Information Cards on the Patient Experience: a Quasi-Experimental Prospective Cohort Study.标准化医院医师信息卡对患者体验的影响:一项准实验前瞻性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(15):3931-3936. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07674-3. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
4
Patient Perspectives of Inpatient Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Assessment.COVID-19大流行期间住院患者对远程医疗的看法:定性评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 30;6(3):e32933. doi: 10.2196/32933.
5
Business Cards as a Mechanism to Encourage Patient Feedback About Trainees.名片作为鼓励患者对实习医生反馈的一种机制。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2021 Jul 19;8(3):267-271. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1802. eCollection 2021 Summer.
6
"What Are My Injuries?" Health Literacy and Patient Comprehension of Trauma Care and Injuries.“我受了什么伤?”健康素养与患者对创伤护理和损伤的理解
J Surg Res. 2021 Dec;268:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
7
Introducing physician associates to hospital patients: Development and feasibility testing of a patient experience-based intervention.向医院患者介绍医师助理:基于患者体验的干预措施的开发和可行性测试。
Health Expect. 2021 Feb;24(1):77-86. doi: 10.1111/hex.13149. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
Improving patients' ability to identify their physicians through the use of physician facecards and whiteboards.通过使用医生名片和白板提高患者识别其医生的能力。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Apr 29;8(2):e000606. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000606. eCollection 2019.
9
Assessment of readability, understandability, and completeness of pediatric hospital medicine discharge instructions.评估儿科医院出院指导的可读性、易懂性和完整性。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Feb;12(2):98-101. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2688.
10
Doctor Who? A Quality Improvement Project to Assess and Improve Patients' Knowledge of Their Inpatient Physicians.《神秘博士?一项评估并提高患者对其住院医师了解程度的质量改进项目》
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 May;8(2):197-201. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00067.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between quality of care and functional decline in hospitalized vulnerable elders.住院弱势老年人的护理质量与功能衰退之间的关系。
Med Care. 2009 Aug;47(8):895-901. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a7e3ec.
2
Transitions of Care Consensus Policy Statement American College of Physicians-Society of General Internal Medicine-Society of Hospital Medicine-American Geriatrics Society-American College of Emergency Physicians-Society of Academic Emergency Medicine.《过渡医疗共识政策声明》美国医师学院-普通内科学会-医院医学学会-美国老年医学学会-美国急诊医师学院-学术急诊医学学会
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Aug;24(8):971-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0969-x. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
3
Ability of hospitalized patients to identify their in-hospital physicians.住院患者识别其住院医师的能力。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 26;169(2):199-201. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.565.
4
Promoting an environment of professionalism: the University of Chicago "Roadmap".营造专业精神的环境:芝加哥大学“路线图”
Acad Med. 2007 Nov;82(11):1098-107. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000285344.10311.a8.
5
An evidence-based perspective on greetings in medical encounters.基于证据的医学诊疗中问候方式的观点。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jun 11;167(11):1172-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.11.1172.
6
Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care.医院医生与基层医疗医生之间沟通和信息传递的不足:对患者安全和医疗连续性的影响。
JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):831-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.8.831.
7
Medical education and the ACGME duty hour requirements: assessing the effect of a day float system on educational activities.医学教育与毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的工作时间要求:评估日间轮转制度对教育活动的影响。
Teach Learn Med. 2006 Winter;18(1):28-34. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1801_7.
8
Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge.出院后返回的检测结果引发的患者安全问题。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jul 19;143(2):121-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-2-200507190-00011.
9
Resuscitating the physician-patient relationship: emergency department communication in an academic medical center.
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Sep;44(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.02.035.
10
Hospitalists in the United States--mission accomplished or work in progress?
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 6;350(19):1935-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp038201.

提高住院患者对其医生的辨识度:使用面部识别卡。

Improving inpatients' identification of their doctors: use of FACE cards.

作者信息

Arora Vineet M, Schaninger Caitlin, D'Arcy Michael, Johnson Julie K, Humphrey Holly J, Woodruff James N, Meltzer David O

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Dec;35(12):613-9. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35086-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35086-2
PMID:20043501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3188440/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improving patients' ability to identify their inpatient physicians and understand their roles is vital to safe patient care. Picture cards were designed to facilitate physician introductions. The effect of Feedback Care and Evaluation (FACE) cards on patients' ability to correctly identify their inpatient physicians and on patients understanding of physicians roles was assessed.

METHODS

In October 2006, team members introduced themselves with FACE cards, which included a photo and an explanation of their roles. During an inpatient interview, research assistants asked patients to name their inpatient physicians and trainees and to rate their understanding of their physicians' roles.

RESULTS

Of 2,100 eligible patients, 1,686 (80%) patients participated in the baseline period, and 857 (67%) of the 1,278 patients in the intervention period participated in the evaluation. With the FACE intervention, patients were significantly more likely to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician (attending, resident, or intern; baseline 12.5% versus intervention 21.1%; p < .001). Of the 181 patients who were able to correctly identify at least one inpatient physician in the intervention period, research assistants noted that 59% (107) had FACE cards visible in their rooms. Surprisingly, fewer patients rated their understanding of their physicians' roles as excellent or very good in the intervention period (45.6%) compared with the baseline period (55.3%; p < .001).

DISCUSSION

Although FACE cards improved patients ability to identify their inpatient physicians, many patients still could not identify their inpatient doctors. FACE cards may have served as a reminder to physicians to introduce themselves to their patients. The FACE cards also served to highlight patients' misunderstanding of their physicians' roles.

摘要

背景

提高患者识别其住院医师并了解其职责的能力对于患者安全护理至关重要。设计了图片卡片以方便医师介绍。评估了反馈护理与评估(FACE)卡片对患者正确识别其住院医师能力以及对医师职责理解的影响。

方法

2006年10月,团队成员使用FACE卡片进行自我介绍,卡片包含照片及其职责说明。在住院患者访谈期间,研究助理询问患者说出其住院医师和实习医生的姓名,并对他们对医师职责的理解进行评分。

结果

在2100名符合条件的患者中,1686名(80%)患者参与了基线期,在干预期的1278名患者中有857名(67%)参与了评估。通过FACE干预,患者更有可能正确识别至少一名住院医师(主治医生、住院医生或实习医生;基线期为12.5%,干预期为21.1%;p<0.001)。在干预期能够正确识别至少一名住院医师的181名患者中,研究助理注意到59%(107名)患者房间里有FACE卡片。令人惊讶的是,与基线期(55.3%)相比,干预期将其对医师职责理解评为优秀或非常好的患者较少(45.6%;p<0.001)。

讨论

尽管FACE卡片提高了患者识别其住院医师的能力,但许多患者仍然无法识别其住院医生。FACE卡片可能起到了提醒医师向患者自我介绍的作用。FACE卡片还凸显了患者对医师职责的误解。