• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of readability, understandability, and completeness of pediatric hospital medicine discharge instructions.评估儿科医院出院指导的可读性、易懂性和完整性。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Feb;12(2):98-101. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2688.
2
Readability and Understandability of Online Vocal Cord Paralysis Materials.在线声带麻痹资料的可读性和易懂性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):460-4. doi: 10.1177/0194599815626146. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
3
Emergency department discharge instruction for mild traumatic brain injury: Evaluation on readability, understandability, actionability and content.急诊科轻度创伤性脑损伤出院指导:可读性、理解度、可操作性和内容评估。
Australas Emerg Care. 2020 Dec;23(4):240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
4
Are Online Zenker's Diverticulum Materials Readable and Understandable?在线的Zenker憩室资料是否易于阅读和理解?
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Nov;155(5):758-763. doi: 10.1177/0194599816655302. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
5
Readability of patient discharge instructions with and without the use of electronically available disease-specific templates.使用和不使用电子可用的疾病特定模板时患者出院指导的可读性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):857-63. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv005. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
Improving the Readability of Pediatric Hospital Medicine Discharge Instructions.提高儿科医院出院指导的可读性。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Jul;12(7):551-557. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2770.
7
Understood? Evaluating the readability and understandability of intranasal corticosteroid delivery instructions.明白了吗?评估鼻用皮质类固醇给药说明的可读性和易懂性。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Jun;10(6):773-778. doi: 10.1002/alr.22550. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
8
Understandability, actionability, and readability of online patient education materials about diabetes mellitus.糖尿病在线患者教育资料的可理解性、可操作性和可读性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jan 25;76(3):182-186. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy021.
9
Patients' ability to read and understand dosing instructions of their own medicines - a cross sectional study in a hospital and community pharmacy setting.患者阅读和理解自身药品用药说明的能力——一项在医院和社区药房环境中的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3252-1.
10
Opportunities to improve clinical summaries for patients at hospital discharge.改善患者出院时临床总结的机会。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):372-380. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005201. Epub 2016 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Representing Population's Perceptions of GPT-Generated Versus Standard Emergency Department Discharge Instructions: Randomized Blind Survey Assessment.患者群体对 GPT 生成的与标准急诊部门出院医嘱的看法:随机盲法调查评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 2;26:e60336. doi: 10.2196/60336.
2
Generative Artificial Intelligence to Transform Inpatient Discharge Summaries to Patient-Friendly Language and Format.生成式人工智能将住院病历摘要转换为患者友好型语言和格式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240357. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0357.
3
Pediatric Resident Communication of Hospital Discharge Instructions.儿科住院医师沟通医院出院指导。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2023 Oct;7(4):e178-e186. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20230918-01. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
4
Caregiver and Clinician Perspectives on Discharge Medication Counseling: A Qualitative Study.照顾者和临床医生对出院药物咨询的看法:一项定性研究。
Hosp Pediatr. 2023 Apr 1;13(4):325-342. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006937.
5
Joint modeling of longitudinal measures of pneumonia and time to convalescence among pneumonia patients: a comparison of separate and joint models.肺炎患者肺炎纵向指标与康复时间的联合建模:独立模型与联合模型的比较
Pneumonia (Nathan). 2022 Dec 25;14(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41479-022-00101-5.
6
Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study.加拿大主要儿科协会基于网络的患者教育材料可读性评估:横断面研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Mar 16;5(1):e31820. doi: 10.2196/31820.
7
Disparity in Nurse Discharge Communication for Hospitalized Families Based on English Proficiency.基于英语水平的住院患者家属护士出院沟通差异。
Hosp Pediatr. 2021 Mar;11(3):245-253. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-000745. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
8
Improved readability and functions needed for mHealth apps targeting patients with heart failure: An app store review.改善针对心力衰竭患者的移动医疗应用程序的可读性和功能:应用商店评价。
Res Nurs Health. 2021 Feb;44(1):71-80. doi: 10.1002/nur.22078. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
9
Discharge Instruction Comprehension and Adherence Errors: Interrelationship Between Plan Complexity and Parent Health Literacy.出院指导理解和遵循错误:计划复杂性与家长健康素养的相互关系。
J Pediatr. 2019 Nov;214:193-200.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.04.052. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
10
Health Literacy in the Inpatient Setting: Implications for Patient Care and Patient Safety.住院患者的健康素养:对患者护理和患者安全的影响。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019 Aug;66(4):805-826. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality Measures to Assess Care Transitions for Hospitalized Children.评估住院儿童护理过渡的质量指标。
Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0906.
2
From discharge to readmission: Understanding the process from the patient perspective.从出院到再次入院:从患者角度理解这一过程。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Jun;11(6):407-12. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2560. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
3
Caregiver Perceptions of Hospital to Home Transitions According to Medical Complexity: A Qualitative Study.根据医疗复杂性探讨照顾者对从医院到家庭过渡的认知:一项定性研究
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Mar;16(2):136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
4
The Family Perspective on Hospital to Home Transitions: A Qualitative Study.家庭对从医院到家庭过渡的看法:一项定性研究。
Pediatrics. 2015 Dec;136(6):e1539-49. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2098.
5
Co-creating patient-oriented discharge instructions with patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers.与患者、护理人员和医疗服务提供者共同制定以患者为导向的出院指导。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Dec;10(12):804-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2444. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
6
Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review.健康素养干预措施与结果:一项更新的系统评价。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Mar(199):1-941.
7
Communicating discharge instructions to patients: a survey of nurse, intern, and hospitalist practices.向患者传达出院医嘱:护士、实习医生和医院医师实践情况的调查。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Jan;8(1):36-41. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1986. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
8
Health literacy and the quality of physician-patient communication during hospitalization.健康素养与住院期间医患沟通的质量。
J Hosp Med. 2010 May-Jun;5(5):269-75. doi: 10.1002/jhm.667.
9
Improving inpatients' identification of their doctors: use of FACE cards.提高住院患者对其医生的辨识度:使用面部识别卡。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Dec;35(12):613-9. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35086-2.
10
Health literacy and quality: focus on chronic illness care and patient safety.健康素养与质量:关注慢性病护理和患者安全。
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124 Suppl 3:S315-26. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1163H.

评估儿科医院出院指导的可读性、易懂性和完整性。

Assessment of readability, understandability, and completeness of pediatric hospital medicine discharge instructions.

作者信息

Unaka Ndidi I, Statile Angela, Haney Julianne, Beck Andrew F, Brady Patrick W, Jerardi Karen E

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2017 Feb;12(2):98-101. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2688.

DOI:10.12788/jhm.2688
PMID:28182805
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6327837/
Abstract

The average American adult reads at an 8th-grade level. Discharge instructions written above this level might increase the risk of adverse outcomes for children as they transition from hospital to home. We conducted a cross-sectional study at a large urban academic children's hospital to describe readability levels, understandability scores, and completeness of written instructions given to families at hospital discharge. Two hundred charts for patients discharged from the hospital medicine service were randomly selected for review. Written discharge instructions were extracted and scored for readability (Fry Readability Scale [FRS]), understandability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [PEMAT]), and completeness (5 criteria determined by consensus). Descriptive statistics enumerated the distribution of readability, understandability, and completeness of written discharge instructions. Of the patients included in the study, 51% were publicly insured. Median age was 3.1 years, and median length of stay was 2.0 days. The median readability score corresponded to a 10th-grade reading level (interquartile range, 8-12; range, 1-13). Median PEMAT score was 73% (interquartile range, 64%-82%; range, 45%-100%); 36% of instructions scored below 70%, correlating with suboptimal understandability. The diagnosis was described in only 33% of the instructions. Although explicit warning signs were listed in most instructions, 38% of the instructions did not include information on the person to contact if warning signs developed. Overall, the readability, understandability, and completeness of discharge instructions were subpar. Efforts to improve the content of discharge instructions may promote safe and effective transitions home. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:98-101.

摘要

美国成年人的平均阅读水平为八年级。高于此水平编写的出院指导可能会增加儿童从医院过渡到家庭时出现不良后果的风险。我们在一家大型城市学术儿童医院进行了一项横断面研究,以描述出院时提供给家庭的书面指导的可读性水平、可理解性得分和完整性。随机抽取了200份医院内科服务出院患者的病历进行审查。提取书面出院指导并对其进行可读性(弗莱可读性量表[FRS])、可理解性(患者教育材料评估工具[PEMAT])和完整性(由共识确定的5项标准)评分。描述性统计列举了书面出院指导的可读性、可理解性和完整性的分布情况。在纳入研究的患者中,51%为公共保险患者。中位年龄为3.1岁,中位住院时间为2.0天。中位可读性得分相当于十年级阅读水平(四分位间距,8 - 12;范围,1 - 13)。PEMAT中位得分为73%(四分位间距,64% - 82%;范围,45% - 100%);36%的指导得分低于70%,与理解性欠佳相关。仅33%的指导中描述了诊断情况。尽管大多数指导中列出了明确的警示标志,但38%的指导未包括出现警示标志时应联系的人员信息。总体而言,出院指导的可读性、可理解性和完整性均未达标准。努力改进出院指导的内容可能会促进安全有效的回家过渡。《医院医学杂志》2017年;12:98 - 101。