Department of Respiratory Medicine, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 7DJ, UK.
Occup Med (Lond). 2010 Mar;60(2):152-5. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp182. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
A recent report highlights the need for clear standards of practice regarding working-age health. Despite this, little is known about training or performance of sickness certification by junior doctors in secondary care.
To see what sickness certification training had been received by practising hospital postgraduate trainees and establish how confident and knowledgeable they were in this area. We also evaluated the feasibility and face validity of a paper-based educational module.
We surveyed 51 junior doctors in a variety of specialties, at all grades. Questions concerned training and practice of sickness certification and assessing capacity for work. A knowledge test regarding formal guidelines, use of forms and self-certification was undertaken, before participants evaluated a 10 min training module.
Seventy-nine per cent of participants lacked knowledge in sickness certification, and 55% were not confident to assess capacity for work; 66% had received no training at all and 71% participants followed no guideline. Many could not identify or explain the use of certificates: MED-3 (50 or 71%, respectively), MED-5 (42 or 38%, respectively), MED-10 (0 or 17%, respectively), RM-7 (2 or 6%, respectively) and DS-1500 (6 or 8%, respectively). Majority of participants thought that an educational module could increase knowledge and skill in sickness certification (96%) and in assessing work capacity (74%).
Junior doctors are involved in sickness certification, but there is a lack of training at undergraduate and postgraduate level, and many are unaware of formal guidance. The majority of junior doctors are concerned about lack of knowledge in this area and to a lesser extent in assessing patients' capacity to work. A simple educational module could improve confidence, knowledge and skills in sickness certification.
最近的一份报告强调了制定明确的工作年龄健康实践标准的必要性。尽管如此,对于中级保健医生在病假证明方面的培训或表现知之甚少。
了解执业住院研究生接受了哪些病假证明培训,并确定他们在这方面的自信和知识水平。我们还评估了基于纸张的教育模块的可行性和表面有效性。
我们调查了 51 名来自不同专业和不同年级的初级医生。问题涉及病假证明的培训和实践以及评估工作能力。在参与者评估 10 分钟的培训模块之前,进行了关于正式指南、表格使用和自我认证的知识测试。
79%的参与者缺乏病假证明方面的知识,55%的人对评估工作能力没有信心;66%的人根本没有接受过培训,71%的人没有遵循任何指南。许多人无法识别或解释证书的用途:MED-3(分别为 50%或 71%)、MED-5(分别为 42%或 38%)、MED-10(分别为 0%或 17%)、RM-7(分别为 2%或 6%)和 DS-1500(分别为 6%或 8%)。大多数参与者认为教育模块可以提高病假证明(96%)和评估工作能力(74%)方面的知识和技能。
初级医生参与病假证明,但本科和研究生阶段缺乏培训,许多人不了解正式指导。大多数初级医生担心在这方面缺乏知识,在一定程度上也担心评估患者工作能力的知识。一个简单的教育模块可以提高病假证明方面的信心、知识和技能。