Suppr超能文献

多黏菌素药敏试验方法评估

Evaluation of susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narain Apex (JPNA) Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, 110029 India.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2010 Jul;14(7):e596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The widespread resistance in Gram-negative bacteria has necessitated evaluation of the use of older antimicrobials such as polymyxins. In the present study we evaluated the different susceptibility testing methods for polymyxins B and E against Gram-negative bacteria using the new Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.

METHODS

The susceptibility of 281 multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) to polymyxin B was evaluated, comparing broth microdilution (BMD; reference method), agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion. Disk diffusion testing of polymyxin B was also performed against 723 MDR GNB.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 281 (8.5%) isolates were found to be resistant to polymyxin B by the reference BMD method. The rates of very major errors for agar dilution and E-test (for polymyxin B) were 0.7% and 1%, respectively, and those for disk diffusion (for polymyxin B and polymyxin E) were 1% and 0.7%, respectively. For the 257 isolates found sensitive by reference BMD, the rates of major errors by agar dilution and E-test (for polymyxin B) were 2.4% and 0%, respectively, and those for disk diffusion (polymyxin B and polymyxin E) were 0% and 0.7%, respectively. Twenty-six (3.6%) of the 723 Gram-negative isolates were resistant to polymyxin B by disk diffusion.

CONCLUSION

The E-test and agar dilution methods showed good concordance with BMD. The disk diffusion method can be useful for initial screening in diagnostic laboratories.

摘要

背景

革兰氏阴性菌的广泛耐药性使得有必要评估使用多粘菌素等旧抗生素。在本研究中,我们根据新的临床和实验室标准协会 (CLSI) 指南评估了多粘菌素 B 和 E 对革兰氏阴性菌的不同药敏试验方法。

方法

评估了 281 株多药耐药(MDR)革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)对多粘菌素 B 的敏感性,比较了肉汤微量稀释(BMD;参考方法)、琼脂稀释、E 试验和纸片扩散法。还对 723 株 MDR GNB 进行了多粘菌素 B 的纸片扩散试验。

结果

281 株分离株中,有 24 株(8.5%)被参考 BMD 法判定为对多粘菌素 B 耐药。琼脂稀释和 E 试验(多粘菌素 B)的非常大错误率分别为 0.7%和 1%,纸片扩散(多粘菌素 B 和多粘菌素 E)的非常大错误率分别为 1%和 0.7%。对于参考 BMD 法判定敏感的 257 株分离株,琼脂稀释和 E 试验(多粘菌素 B)的主要错误率分别为 2.4%和 0%,纸片扩散(多粘菌素 B 和多粘菌素 E)的主要错误率分别为 0%和 0.7%。723 株革兰氏阴性分离株中有 26 株(3.6%)对多粘菌素 B 纸片扩散法耐药。

结论

E 试验和琼脂稀释法与 BMD 具有良好的一致性。纸片扩散法可用于诊断实验室的初步筛选。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验