Gales A C, Reis A O, Jones R N
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):183-90. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.183-190.2001.
The emergence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. has necessitated the search for alternative parenteral agents such as the polymyxins. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) documents do not currently provide interpretative criteria for the testing of the polymyxins, colistin and polymyxin B. Therefore, an evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of colistin and polymyxin B was initiated using 200 bloodstream infection pathogens collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. All susceptibility tests were performed according to the NCCLS recommendations. Polymyxin B and colistin displayed a nearly identical spectrum of activity, exhibiting excellent potency against P. aeruginosa (MIC(90), 2 microg/ml) and Acinetobacter sp. (MIC(90), 2 microg/ml). In contrast, they showed limited activity against some other nonfermentative bacilli such as Burkholderia cepacia (MIC(90), >/=128 microg/ml). Excellent correlation was achieved between broth microdilution and agar dilution tests (r = 0.96 to 0.98); 94.3% of the results were +/-1 log(2) dilution between the methods used for both compounds. At a resistance breakpoint of >/=4 microg/ml for both agents, unacceptable false-susceptible or very major errors were noted for colistin (5%) and polymyxin B (6%). Modified zone criteria for colistin (</=11 and >/=14 mm) and polymyxin B (</=10 and >/=14 mm) were suggested, but some degree of error persisted (>/=3.5%). It is recommended that all susceptible disk diffusion results be confirmed by MIC tests using the preferred reference NCCLS method. The quality control (QC) ranges listed in the product package insert require an adjusted range by approximately 3 mm for both NCCLS gram-negative quality control strains. This evaluation of in vitro susceptibility test methods for the polymyxin class drugs confirmed continued serious testing error with the disk diffusion method, the possible need for breakpoint adjustments, and the recalculation of disk diffusion QC ranges. Clinical laboratories should exclusively use MIC methods to assist the therapeutic application of colistin or polymyxin B until disk diffusion test modifications are sanctioned and published by the NCCLS.
多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌和不动杆菌属引起的感染不断出现,因此有必要寻找如多黏菌素这类可供注射用的替代药物。美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)的文件目前尚未提供针对多黏菌素、黏菌素和多黏菌素B检测的解释标准。因此,利用通过哨兵抗菌监测计划收集的200株血流感染病原体,对黏菌素和多黏菌素B的抗菌活性展开了评估。所有药敏试验均按照NCCLS的建议进行。多黏菌素B和黏菌素表现出几乎相同的活性谱,对铜绿假单胞菌(MIC90,2微克/毫升)和不动杆菌属(MIC90,2微克/毫升)显示出优异的抗菌效力。相比之下,它们对一些其他非发酵菌如洋葱伯克霍尔德菌的活性有限(MIC90,≥128微克/毫升)。肉汤微量稀释法和琼脂稀释法之间具有良好的相关性(r = 0.96至0.98);两种化合物所采用方法的结果有94.3%在±1个对数2稀释度范围内。对于两种药物,当耐药折点≥4微克/毫升时,发现黏菌素(5%)和多黏菌素B(6%)存在不可接受的假敏感或重大错误。建议了黏菌素(≤11和≥14毫米)和多黏菌素B(≤10和≥14毫米)的改良抑菌圈标准,但仍存在一定程度的误差(≥3.5%)。建议所有敏感的纸片扩散法结果都通过使用首选的NCCLS参考方法进行的MIC试验来确认。产品包装说明书中列出的质量控制(QC)范围要求对NCCLS革兰阴性质量控制菌株的范围进行约3毫米的调整。对多黏菌素类药物体外药敏试验方法的评估证实,纸片扩散法持续存在严重的检测误差,可能需要调整折点,并重新计算纸片扩散法的QC范围。临床实验室应仅使用MIC方法来辅助黏菌素或多黏菌素B的治疗应用,直至NCCLS批准并公布纸片扩散试验的改良方法。