Vansteelandt Stijn, Babanezhad Manoochehr, Goetghebeur Els
Ghent University, Belgium.
Stat Sin. 2009 Jan 1;19:1223-1246.
Instrumental variables (IV) estimators are well established to correct for measurement error on exposure in a broad range of fields. In a distinct prominent stream of research IV's are becoming increasingly popular for estimating causal effects of exposure on outcome since they allow for unmeasured confounders which are hard to avoid. Because many causal questions emerge from data which suffer severe measurement error problems, we combine both IV approaches in this article to correct IV-based causal effect estimators in linear (structural mean) models for possibly systematic measurement error on the exposure. The estimators rely on the presence of a baseline measurement which is associated with the observed exposure and known not to modify the target effect. Simulation studies and the analysis of a small blood pressure reduction trial (n = 105) with treatment noncompliance confirm the adequate performance of our estimators in finite samples. Our results also demonstrate that incorporating limited prior knowledge about a weakly identified parameter (such as the error mean) in a frequentist analysis can yield substantial improvements.
工具变量(IV)估计器在广泛的领域中已被广泛用于校正暴露的测量误差。在一个独特的重要研究方向中,IV在估计暴露对结果的因果效应方面越来越受欢迎,因为它们允许存在难以避免的未测量混杂因素。由于许多因果问题源于存在严重测量误差问题的数据,我们在本文中结合了两种IV方法,以校正线性(结构均值)模型中基于IV的因果效应估计器,用于暴露可能存在的系统性测量误差。这些估计器依赖于存在一个基线测量值,该测量值与观察到的暴露相关,并且已知不会改变目标效应。模拟研究以及对一项存在治疗不依从情况的小型血压降低试验(n = 105)的分析证实了我们的估计器在有限样本中的良好性能。我们的结果还表明,在频率论分析中纳入关于弱识别参数(如误差均值)的有限先验知识可以带来显著改进。