• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Correcting Instrumental Variables Estimators for Systematic Measurement Error.针对系统测量误差校正工具变量估计量
Stat Sin. 2009 Jan 1;19:1223-1246.
2
Multiplicative versus additive modelling of causal effects using instrumental variables for survival outcomes - a comparison.使用工具变量对生存结局进行因果效应的乘法建模与加法建模——一项比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):3-25. doi: 10.1177/09622802241293765. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Sensitivity analysis of G-estimators to invalid instrumental variables.工具变量无效时 G 估计量的敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2023 Oct 15;42(23):4257-4281. doi: 10.1002/sim.9859. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.未测量的组内和组间混杂因素对连续暴露效应估计值偏倚的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Aug;29(8):2119-2139. doi: 10.1177/0962280219883323. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Efficiency and robustness of causal effect estimators when noncompliance is measured with error.当非依从性的测量存在误差时,因果效应估计的效率和稳健性。
Stat Med. 2018 Dec 10;37(28):4126-4141. doi: 10.1002/sim.7922. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
7
Weighted estimators of the complier average causal effect on restricted mean survival time with observed instrument-outcome confounders.加权估计器对受限平均生存时间的遵嘱平均因果效应,考虑到观察到的工具-结局混杂因素。
Biom J. 2021 Apr;63(4):712-724. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900284. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
8
Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.边际结构模型中时变协变量测量误差的校正
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 1;184(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww068. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
9
Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization.广义线性模型中工具变量效应的一致性检验及其在孟德尔随机化中的应用
Stat Med. 2014 Oct 15;33(23):3986-4007. doi: 10.1002/sim.6217. Epub 2014 May 26.
10
Causal Proportional Hazards Estimation with a Binary Instrumental Variable.使用二元工具变量的因果比例风险估计
Stat Sin. 2021 Apr;31(2):673-699. doi: 10.5705/ss.202019.0096.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjusting the Effect of Integrating Antiretroviral Therapy and Tuberculosis Treatment on Mortality for Noncompliance: A Time-varying Instrumental Variables Analysis.调整抗逆转录病毒疗法和结核病治疗整合对不依从性死亡率影响的方法:时变工具变量分析。
Epidemiology. 2019 Mar;30(2):197-203. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000923.

本文引用的文献

1
Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology.孟德尔随机化:利用基因作为工具在流行病学中进行因果推断。
Stat Med. 2008 Apr 15;27(8):1133-63. doi: 10.1002/sim.3034.
2
Causal mediation analyses with rank preserving models.使用秩保持模型的因果中介分析。
Biometrics. 2007 Sep;63(3):926-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00766.x.
3
Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.孟德尔随机化作为一种用于因果推断的工具变量法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Aug;16(4):309-30. doi: 10.1177/0962280206077743.
4
Mediation analysis via potential outcomes models.通过潜在结果模型进行中介分析。
Stat Med. 2008 Apr 15;27(8):1282-304. doi: 10.1002/sim.3016.
5
Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?因果推断的工具:流行病学家的梦想?
Epidemiology. 2006 Jul;17(4):360-72. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000222409.00878.37.
6
Instrumental variables: application and limitations.工具变量:应用与局限性
Epidemiology. 2006 May;17(3):260-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000215160.88317.cb.
7
Structural mean models for compliance analysis in randomized clinical trials and the impact of errors on measures of exposure.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2005 Aug;14(4):397-415. doi: 10.1191/0962280205sm407oa.
8
Comparison of maximum statistics for hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative.当仅在备择假设下存在干扰参数时用于假设检验的最大统计量比较。
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):254-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030531.x.
9
Homocysteine and stroke: evidence on a causal link from mendelian randomisation.同型半胱氨酸与中风:来自孟德尔随机化的因果关系证据。
Lancet. 2005;365(9455):224-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17742-3.
10
Sense and sensitivity when correcting for observed exposures in randomized clinical trials.在随机临床试验中校正观察到的暴露因素时的合理性与敏感性
Stat Med. 2005 Jan 30;24(2):191-210. doi: 10.1002/sim.1829.

针对系统测量误差校正工具变量估计量

Correcting Instrumental Variables Estimators for Systematic Measurement Error.

作者信息

Vansteelandt Stijn, Babanezhad Manoochehr, Goetghebeur Els

机构信息

Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

Stat Sin. 2009 Jan 1;19:1223-1246.

PMID:20046952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2743431/
Abstract

Instrumental variables (IV) estimators are well established to correct for measurement error on exposure in a broad range of fields. In a distinct prominent stream of research IV's are becoming increasingly popular for estimating causal effects of exposure on outcome since they allow for unmeasured confounders which are hard to avoid. Because many causal questions emerge from data which suffer severe measurement error problems, we combine both IV approaches in this article to correct IV-based causal effect estimators in linear (structural mean) models for possibly systematic measurement error on the exposure. The estimators rely on the presence of a baseline measurement which is associated with the observed exposure and known not to modify the target effect. Simulation studies and the analysis of a small blood pressure reduction trial (n = 105) with treatment noncompliance confirm the adequate performance of our estimators in finite samples. Our results also demonstrate that incorporating limited prior knowledge about a weakly identified parameter (such as the error mean) in a frequentist analysis can yield substantial improvements.

摘要

工具变量(IV)估计器在广泛的领域中已被广泛用于校正暴露的测量误差。在一个独特的重要研究方向中,IV在估计暴露对结果的因果效应方面越来越受欢迎,因为它们允许存在难以避免的未测量混杂因素。由于许多因果问题源于存在严重测量误差问题的数据,我们在本文中结合了两种IV方法,以校正线性(结构均值)模型中基于IV的因果效应估计器,用于暴露可能存在的系统性测量误差。这些估计器依赖于存在一个基线测量值,该测量值与观察到的暴露相关,并且已知不会改变目标效应。模拟研究以及对一项存在治疗不依从情况的小型血压降低试验(n = 105)的分析证实了我们的估计器在有限样本中的良好性能。我们的结果还表明,在频率论分析中纳入关于弱识别参数(如误差均值)的有限先验知识可以带来显著改进。