• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实验室误差评估:一年经验总结。

Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: a one-year experience.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(1):63-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.006.

DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2010.006
PMID:20047530
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efficient laboratory service is the cornerstone of modern health care systems. Scientific innovations have contributed to substantial improvements in the field of laboratory science, but errors still prevail. These errors are classified as preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical, depending upon the time of presentation.

METHODS

The data for 67,438 routine venous blood specimens were scrutinized, and errors were documented over the period of 1 year in the clinical biochemistry laboratory of Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital in Delhi, India.

RESULTS

Preanalytical errors were most common, with a frequency of 77.1% followed by postanalytical 15% and analytical 7.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study illustrates the importance of proper venipuncture procedures, analytical expertise and correct transcription of numerical data for precise and accurate reporting of results to clinicians. There is an urgent need for close inter-departmental cooperation to meet the goal of ensuring patient well being.

摘要

背景

高效的实验室服务是现代医疗保健系统的基石。科学创新极大地促进了实验室科学领域的发展,但错误仍然存在。这些错误根据出现的时间分为分析前、分析中和分析后。

方法

对印度德里 Govind Ballabh Pant 医院临床生化实验室的 67438 例常规静脉血标本数据进行了为期 1 年的审查,并记录了误差。

结果

分析前误差最常见,占 77.1%,其次是分析后误差占 15%,分析中误差占 7.9%。

结论

我们的研究表明,正确的静脉穿刺程序、分析专业知识以及正确转录数值数据对于向临床医生准确报告结果非常重要。迫切需要密切的部门间合作,以确保患者的福祉。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: a one-year experience.临床实验室误差评估:一年经验总结。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(1):63-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.006.
2
Preanalytical errors in medical laboratories: a review of the available methodologies of data collection and analysis.医学实验室中的分析前误差:可用数据收集与分析方法综述
Ann Clin Biochem. 2017 Jan;54(1):14-19. doi: 10.1177/0004563216669384. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
3
Preanalytical error occurrence rate in clinical chemistry laboratory of a public hospital in India.印度一家公立医院临床化学实验室的分析前误差发生率。
Clin Lab. 2011;57(9-10):749-52.
4
Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later.十年后统计实验室的误差:类型与频率
Clin Chem. 2007 Jul;53(7):1338-42. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344. Epub 2007 May 24.
5
Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.通过教育和技术干预减少分析前实验室样本误差。
Clin Lab. 2012;58(9-10):911-7.
6
Patient identification and tube labelling - a call for harmonisation.患者身份识别和管腔标签——呼吁协调统一。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):1141-5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-1089.
7
Laboratory reporting of hemostasis assays: the final post-analytical opportunity to reduce errors of clinical diagnosis in hemostasis?实验室止血检测报告:减少止血诊断中分析后错误的最后机会?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010 Mar;48(3):309-21. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.061.
8
The prevalence of preanalytical errors in a Croatian ISO 15189 accredited laboratory.克罗地亚 ISO 15189 认证实验室中分析前误差的流行率。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010 Jul;48(7):1009-14. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.221.
9
Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE).分析前质量改进。追求和谐,代表欧洲临床化学和实验室医学联合会(EFLM)分析前阶段工作组(WG-PRE)。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Feb;53(3):357-70. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1051.
10
Preanalytical and postanalytical variables: the leading causes of diagnostic error in hemostasis?分析前和分析后变量:止血诊断错误的主要原因?
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2008 Oct;34(7):612-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1104540. Epub 2008 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Streamlining Molecular and Serology Laboratory Operations: A Lean Six Sigma Approach.简化分子与血清学实验室操作:一种精益六西格玛方法。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 4;17(3):e80038. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80038. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Root Cause Analysis: Unraveling Common Laboratory Challenges.根本原因分析:剖析常见的实验室挑战。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53393. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53393. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Assessment of hematology laboratory performance in the total testing process using quality indicators and sigma metrics in the northwest of Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.
使用质量指标和西格玛指标评估埃塞俄比亚西北部全检测过程中的血液学实验室性能:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 22;7(1):e1833. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1833. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Quality analysis of the clinical laboratory literature and its effectiveness on clinical quality improvement: a systematic review.临床检验文献的质量分析及其对临床质量改进的有效性:一项系统评价
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2023 Sep;73(2):108-115. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.23-22. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
5
Intralipid as a matrix additive for evaluating hyperlipidemic postmortem blood.脂肪乳作为基质添加剂评估高脂血症死后血液。
J Anal Toxicol. 2023 Jul 22;47(6):529-534. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkad025.
6
Discrepancies in Lipemia Interference Between Endogenous Lipemic Samples and Smoflipid-Supplemented Samples.内源性脂血样本与补充Smoflipid样本之间的脂血干扰差异。
EJIFCC. 2023 Apr 18;34(1):27-41. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Short-term intra-individual variation of urinary biomarkers in dogs with stable chronic kidney disease.稳定期慢性肾病犬尿液生物标志物的个体内短期变异。
J Vet Intern Med. 2023 Jan;37(1):184-190. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16619. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
8
Blood specimen rejection rate in clinical laboratory: A systematic review and meta-analysis.临床实验室血液标本拒收率:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Pract Lab Med. 2022 Dec 19;33:e00303. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00303. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Information Adequacy in Histopathology Request Forms: A Milestone in Making a Communication Bridge Between Confusion and Clarity in Medical Diagnosis.病理申请单中的信息充分性:在医学诊断的困惑与清晰之间架起沟通桥梁的里程碑。
Turk Patoloji Derg. 2023;39(3):185-191. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2022.01595.
10
The impact of laboratory staff training workshops on coagulation specimen rejection rates.实验室工作人员培训研讨会对凝血样本拒收率的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0268764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268764. eCollection 2022.