临床实验室误差评估：一年经验总结。
Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: a one-year experience.
机构信息
Department of Biochemistry, GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India.
出版信息
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(1):63-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.006.
BACKGROUND
Efficient laboratory service is the cornerstone of modern health care systems. Scientific innovations have contributed to substantial improvements in the field of laboratory science, but errors still prevail. These errors are classified as preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical, depending upon the time of presentation.
METHODS
The data for 67,438 routine venous blood specimens were scrutinized, and errors were documented over the period of 1 year in the clinical biochemistry laboratory of Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital in Delhi, India.
RESULTS
Preanalytical errors were most common, with a frequency of 77.1% followed by postanalytical 15% and analytical 7.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study illustrates the importance of proper venipuncture procedures, analytical expertise and correct transcription of numerical data for precise and accurate reporting of results to clinicians. There is an urgent need for close inter-departmental cooperation to meet the goal of ensuring patient well being.
背景
高效的实验室服务是现代医疗保健系统的基石。科学创新极大地促进了实验室科学领域的发展，但错误仍然存在。这些错误根据出现的时间分为分析前、分析中和分析后。
方法
对印度德里 Govind Ballabh Pant 医院临床生化实验室的 67438 例常规静脉血标本数据进行了为期 1 年的审查，并记录了误差。
结果
分析前误差最常见，占 77.1%，其次是分析后误差占 15%，分析中误差占 7.9%。
结论
我们的研究表明，正确的静脉穿刺程序、分析专业知识以及正确转录数值数据对于向临床医生准确报告结果非常重要。迫切需要密切的部门间合作，以确保患者的福祉。
Zotero 插件