• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十年后统计实验室的误差:类型与频率

Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later.

作者信息

Carraro Paolo, Plebani Mario

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Università and Azienda ULSS 16, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2007 Jul;53(7):1338-42. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344. Epub 2007 May 24.

DOI:10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344
PMID:17525103
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In view of increasing attention focused on patient safety and the need to reduce laboratory errors, it is important that clinical laboratories collect statistics on error occurrence rates over the whole testing cycle, including pre-, intra-, and postanalytical phases.

METHODS

The present study was conducted in 2006 according to the design we previously used in 1996 to monitor the error rates for laboratory testing in 4 different departments (internal medicine, nephrology, surgery, and intensive care). For 3 months, physicians and nurses were asked to pay careful attention to all test results. Any suspected laboratory error was recorded with associated pertinent clinical information. Every day, a laboratory physician visited the 4 departments and a critical appraisal was made of any suspect results.

RESULTS

Among a total of 51 746 analyses, clinicians notified us of 393 questionable findings, 160 of which were confirmed as laboratory errors. The overall frequency of errors, 3092 ppm, was significantly lower (P <0.05) than in 1996 (4700 ppm). Of the 160 confirmed errors, 61.9% were preanalytical errors, 15% were analytical, and 23.1% were postanalytical.

CONCLUSIONS

During the last decade the error rates in our stat laboratory have been reduced significantly. As demonstrated by the distribution pattern, the pre- and postanalytical steps still have the highest error prevalences, but changes have occurred in the types and frequencies of errors in these phases of testing.

摘要

背景

鉴于对患者安全的关注度不断提高以及减少实验室误差的必要性,临床实验室收集整个检测周期(包括分析前、分析中和分析后阶段)的误差发生率统计数据非常重要。

方法

本研究于2006年按照我们先前在1996年使用的设计进行,以监测4个不同科室(内科、肾病科、外科和重症监护室)的实验室检测误差率。在3个月的时间里,要求医生和护士密切关注所有检测结果。任何疑似实验室误差都要记录相关的临床信息。每天,一名实验室医生走访这4个科室,并对任何可疑结果进行严格评估。

结果

在总共51746次分析中,临床医生向我们通报了393个可疑结果,其中160个被确认为实验室误差。误差的总体发生率为3092 ppm,显著低于1996年(4700 ppm)(P<0.05)。在160个已确认的误差中,61.9%为分析前误差,15%为分析误差,23.1%为分析后误差。

结论

在过去十年中,我们急诊实验室的误差率显著降低。从分布模式可以看出,分析前和分析后步骤的误差发生率仍然最高,但在检测的这些阶段,误差的类型和频率已经发生了变化。

相似文献

1
Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later.十年后统计实验室的误差:类型与频率
Clin Chem. 2007 Jul;53(7):1338-42. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344. Epub 2007 May 24.
2
Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency.检验科的差错:类型与发生率
Clin Chem. 1997 Aug;43(8 Pt 1):1348-51.
3
Medical errors: impact on clinical laboratories and other critical areas.医疗差错:对临床实验室及其他关键领域的影响
Clin Biochem. 2004 Dec;37(12):1052-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.08.009.
4
Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.通过教育和技术干预减少分析前实验室样本误差。
Clin Lab. 2012;58(9-10):911-7.
5
Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: a one-year experience.临床实验室误差评估:一年经验总结。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(1):63-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.006.
6
Types and Frequencies of Pre-Analytical Errors in the Clinical Laboratory at the University Hospital of Korea.韩国大学医院临床实验室分析前误差的类型及频率
Clin Lab. 2019 Sep 1;65(9). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.190512.
7
An error management system in a veterinary clinical laboratory.兽医临床实验室中的差错管理系统。
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2012 May;24(3):458-68. doi: 10.1177/1040638712441782.
8
Evaluating laboratory key performance using quality indicators in Alexandria University Hospital Clinical Chemistry Laboratories.使用质量指标评估亚历山大大学医院临床化学实验室的实验室关键绩效。
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2014 Dec;89(3):105-13. doi: 10.1097/01.EPX.0000453262.85383.70.
9
An audit of error rates in a UK district hospital transfusion laboratory.
Transfus Med. 1999 Sep;9(3):199-203. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.1999.00199.x.
10
Specimen rejection in laboratory medicine: Necessary for patient safety?检验医学中的标本拒收:对患者安全而言是否必要?
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Oct 15;25(3):377-85. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.037. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing clinical laboratory efficiency through digital shadow and lean six sigma integration: A real-time monitoring approach to reduce intra-laboratory turnaround time.通过数字影子与精益六西格玛整合优化临床实验室效率:一种减少实验室内部周转时间的实时监测方法。
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 2;11:20552076251375939. doi: 10.1177/20552076251375939. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Evaluation of specimen rejection rates in the preanalytical phase and nurses' experiences: a mixed design study.分析前阶段标本拒收率评估及护士的经验:一项混合设计研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03426-w.
3
Pre-analytical phase errors constitute the vast majority of errors in clinical laboratory testing.
分析前阶段误差在临床实验室检测误差中占绝大多数。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0190.
4
A Quality Improvement Intervention to Enhance Documentation on Histopathology Request Forms.一项旨在加强组织病理学申请表记录的质量改进干预措施。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81317. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Artificial Intelligence for Kidney Stone Spectra Analysis: Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Quality Assurance in the Clinical Laboratory.用于肾结石光谱分析的人工智能:在临床实验室中使用人工智能算法进行质量保证。
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Feb 8;1(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.01.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Evaluation of pre-analytical errors using six sigma metrics towards quality of laboratory performance in an Indian tertiary care hospital.使用六西格玛指标评估印度一家三级护理医院实验室检测前误差对实验室性能质量的影响。
Bioinformation. 2024 Oct 31;20(10):1418-1423. doi: 10.6026/9732063002001418. eCollection 2024.
7
Complete blood count in neonatal Intensive care Unit (NICU): Performance comparison between POCT Sight OLO® and Sysmex XN-9100™ hematology analyzers.新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的全血细胞计数:POCT Sight OLO®与Sysmex XN - 9100™血液分析仪的性能比较
Pract Lab Med. 2025 Jan 14;44:e00453. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00453. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
The journey to pre-analytical quality.迈向分析前质量的征程。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Jan 28;63(7):1237-1238. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0057. Print 2025 Jun 26.
9
From errors to excellence: the pre-analytical journey to improved quality in diagnostics. A scoping review.从错误到卓越:诊断中提高质量的分析前历程。一项范围综述。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Jan 28;63(7):1243-1259. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1277. Print 2025 Jun 26.
10
Smart medical report: efficient detection of common and rare diseases on common blood tests.智能医学报告:在常规血液检测中高效检测常见和罕见疾病。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Dec 5;6:1505483. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1505483. eCollection 2024.