• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

祈祷和治疗:随机对照试验的医学和科学视角。

Prayer and healing: A medical and scientific perspective on randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Professor of Psychopharmacology, Department of Psychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore - 560 029, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2009 Oct-Dec;51(4):247-53. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.58288.

DOI:10.4103/0019-5545.58288
PMID:20048448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2802370/
Abstract

Religious traditions across the world display beliefs in healing through prayer. The healing powers of prayer have been examined in triple-blind, randomized controlled trials. We illustrate randomized controlled trials on prayer and healing, with one study in each of different categories of outcome. We provide a critical analysis of the scientific and philosophical dimensions of such research. Prayer has been reported to improve outcomes in human as well as nonhuman species, to have no effect on outcomes, to worsen outcomes and to have retrospective healing effects. For a multitude of reasons, research on the healing effects of prayer is riddled with assumptions, challenges and contradictions that make the subject a scientific and religious minefield. We believe that the research has led nowhere, and that future research, if any, will forever be constrained by the scientific limitations that we outline.

摘要

世界各地的宗教传统都表现出通过祈祷来治愈疾病的信仰。祈祷的治疗效果已经在三盲、随机对照试验中进行了检验。我们通过在不同类别的结果中各进行一项研究来说明祈祷和治疗的随机对照试验,并对这类研究的科学和哲学维度进行了批判性分析。据报道,祈祷可以改善人类和非人类物种的结果,可以对结果没有影响,可以使结果恶化,并且可以产生回顾性的治疗效果。由于诸多原因,关于祈祷治疗效果的研究充满了假设、挑战和矛盾,使得这个主题成为一个科学和宗教的雷区。我们认为,这项研究没有任何结果,如果有未来的研究,也将永远受到我们所概述的科学限制的制约。

相似文献

1
Prayer and healing: A medical and scientific perspective on randomized controlled trials.祈祷和治疗:随机对照试验的医学和科学视角。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2009 Oct-Dec;51(4):247-53. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.58288.
2
Research methodology for studies of prayer and distant healing.祈祷与远程治疗研究的研究方法
Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery. 2002 Feb;8(1):29-41. doi: 10.1054/ctnm.2001.0597.
3
Prayer Healing: A Case Study Research Protocol.祈祷疗法:一项案例研究方案。
Adv Mind Body Med. 2017;31(3):17-22.
4
Does religious activity improve health outcomes? A critical review of the recent literature.宗教活动能改善健康状况吗?对近期文献的批判性综述。
Explore (NY). 2005 May;1(3):186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2005.02.001.
5
The effect of intercessory prayer on wound healing in nonhuman primates.代祷对非人灵长类动物伤口愈合的影响。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;12(6):42-8.
6
A randomized trial of the effects of remote intercessory prayer: interactions with personal beliefs on problem-specific outcomes and functional status.远程代祷效果的随机试验:与个人信念对特定问题结果和功能状态的相互作用
J Altern Complement Med. 2004 Jun;10(3):438-48. doi: 10.1089/1075553041323803.
7
Research on Intercessory Prayer: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations.代祷研究:理论与方法学考量
J Relig Health. 2017 Dec;56(6):1930-1936. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0172-9.
8
Prevalence and Religious Predictors of Healing Prayer Use in the USA: Findings from the Baylor Religion Survey.美国治愈性祈祷的使用情况及其宗教预测因素:来自贝勒宗教调查的结果。
J Relig Health. 2016 Aug;55(4):1136-58. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0240-9.
9
Prayer as therapy. A challenge to both religious belief and professional ethics. The Anglican Working Group in Bioethics.祈祷作为治疗方法。对宗教信仰和职业道德的一项挑战。英国圣公会生物伦理工作组。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 May-Jun;30(3):40-7.
10
Comment on prayer and healing: A medical and scientific perspective on randomized controlled trials.关于祈祷与康复的评论:对随机对照试验的医学与科学视角
Indian J Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;52(2):193. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.64587.

引用本文的文献

1
Amelioration of Adults' Mental Health Conditions and Symptoms Through Spiritual Energy Therapy: Randomized Controlled Trial.通过灵能疗法改善成年人心理健康状况及症状:随机对照试验
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2025 Sep;45(3):e70050. doi: 10.1002/npr2.70050.
2
Healing through faith: Meeting a chaplain coupled with biblical readings could produce lymphocyte changes that correlate with brain activity (HEALING study).通过信仰实现治愈:与牧师会面并结合圣经诵读可能会引起与大脑活动相关的淋巴细胞变化(治愈研究)。
F1000Res. 2024 Oct 30;10:1295. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.74504.5. eCollection 2021.
3
Spirituality and mental health - investigating the association between spiritual attitudes and psychosomatic treatment outcomes.精神性与心理健康——探究精神态度与身心治疗效果之间的关联。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 27;15:1497630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1497630. eCollection 2024.
4
How to Diagnose Abhorrent Science.如何诊断不良科学。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Nov;54(6):18-29. doi: 10.1002/hast.4946.
5
Science and faith as applied to medicine: Adopting the middle path.应用于医学的科学与信仰:走中间道路。
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 11;13:244. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_340_24. eCollection 2024.
6
The remote intercessory prayer, during the clinical evolution of patients with COVID -19, randomized double-blind clinical trial.针对新冠肺炎患者临床病程的远程代祷随机双盲临床试验。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 17;9(11):e22411. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22411. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Self reported benefits of participating in group prayer in a hospital outpatient setting: A cross-sectional observational study.在医院门诊环境中参与集体祈祷的自我报告益处:一项横断面观察性研究。
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2023 Sep-Oct;14(5):100738. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100738. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
8
A Dutch Study of Remarkable Recoveries After Prayer: How to Deal with Uncertainties of Explanation.荷兰对祈祷后显著康复的研究:如何应对解释的不确定性。
J Relig Health. 2023 Jun;62(3):1731-1755. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01750-6. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
9
Explaining the Process of Spiritual healing of Critically-ill Patients: A Grounded Theory Study.解释重症患者的精神康复过程:一项扎根理论研究。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020 Jul 1;30(4):579-588. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i4.13.
10
Role of Faith healers: A barrier or a support system to medical care- a cross sectional study.信仰治疗师的作用:医疗保健的障碍还是支持系统——一项横断面研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Aug 25;9(8):4298-4304. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_868_20. eCollection 2020 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: a review.宗教、精神信仰与心理健康的研究:综述
Can J Psychiatry. 2009 May;54(5):283-91. doi: 10.1177/070674370905400502.
2
Motivational concordance: an important mechanism in self-help therapeutic rituals involving inert (placebo) substances.动机一致性:涉及惰性(安慰剂)物质的自助治疗仪式中的一种重要机制。
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Nov;65(5):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
3
Placebo response in depression: a perspective for clinical practice.抑郁症中的安慰剂反应:临床实践视角
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2008;41(3):91-8.
4
The placebo treatments in neurosciences: New insights from clinical and neuroimaging studies.神经科学中的安慰剂治疗:来自临床和神经影像学研究的新见解。
Neurology. 2008 Aug 26;71(9):677-84. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000324635.49971.3d.
5
Differential effects of relaxation techniques on ultraweak photon emission.放松技巧对超微弱光子发射的差异效应。
J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Apr;14(3):241-50. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.7185.
6
Blood pressure response to transcendental meditation: a meta-analysis.超觉静坐对血压的反应:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Hypertens. 2008 Mar;21(3):310-6. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2007.65. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
7
Further evidence for individual differences in placebo responding: an interactionist perspective.安慰剂反应个体差异的进一步证据:一种交互作用论观点
J Psychosom Res. 2007 May;62(5):563-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.12.005.
8
Dispositional predictors of placebo responding: a motivational interpretation of flower essence and gratitude therapy.安慰剂反应的性格预测因素:对花精疗法和感恩疗法的动机性解读
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Mar;62(3):331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.10.006.
9
A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction.一项关于正念冥想与放松训练的随机对照试验:对痛苦、积极心理状态、沉思和分心的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Feb;33(1):11-21. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3301_2.
10
Placebo and nocebo in cardiovascular health: implications for healthcare, research, and the doctor-patient relationship.安慰剂和反安慰剂对心血管健康的影响:对医疗保健、研究及医患关系的启示
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 30;49(4):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.036. Epub 2007 Jan 16.