• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用子样本数据减轻线性生态偏差与优化设计

Alleviating Linear Ecological Bias and Optimal Design with Sub-sample Data.

作者信息

Glynn Adam, Wakefield Jon, Handcock Mark S, Richardson Thomas S

机构信息

Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2008 Jan 1;171(1):179-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00511.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00511.x
PMID:20052294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2801082/
Abstract

In this paper, we illustrate that combining ecological data with subsample data in situations in which a linear model is appropriate provides three main benefits. First, by including the individual level subsample data, the biases associated with linear ecological inference can be eliminated. Second, by supplementing the subsample data with ecological data, the information about parameters will be increased. Third, we can use readily available ecological data to design optimal subsampling schemes, so as to further increase the information about parameters. We present an application of this methodology to the classic problem of estimating the effect of a college degree on wages. We show that combining ecological data with subsample data provides precise estimates of this value, and that optimal subsampling schemes (conditional on the ecological data) can provide good precision with only a fraction of the observations.

摘要

在本文中,我们阐述了在适合线性模型的情形下,将生态数据与子样本数据相结合能带来三个主要益处。其一,通过纳入个体层面的子样本数据,可消除与线性生态推断相关的偏差。其二,用生态数据补充子样本数据,会增加有关参数的信息。其三,我们能够利用现成的生态数据来设计最优子抽样方案,从而进一步增加有关参数的信息。我们将这种方法应用于估计大学学位对工资影响的经典问题。我们表明,将生态数据与子样本数据相结合能精确估计该值,并且最优子抽样方案(以生态数据为条件)仅需一小部分观测值就能提供良好的精度。

相似文献

1
Alleviating Linear Ecological Bias and Optimal Design with Sub-sample Data.利用子样本数据减轻线性生态偏差与优化设计
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2008 Jan 1;171(1):179-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00511.x.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR).与火星样本返回(MSR)相关的对灭菌敏感的科学研究的规划意义。
Astrobiology. 2022 Jun;22(S1):S112-S164. doi: 10.1089/AST.2021.0113. Epub 2022 May 19.
4
5
Bayes computation for ecological inference.贝叶斯计算在生态推断中的应用。
Stat Med. 2011 May 30;30(12):1381-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.4214. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
6
Optimal Poisson subsampling decorrelated score for high-dimensional generalized linear models.高维广义线性模型的最优泊松子采样去相关得分
J Appl Stat. 2024 Feb 11;51(14):2719-2743. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2024.2315467. eCollection 2024.
7
Asymptotics of Subsampling for Generalized Linear Regression Models under Unbounded Design.无界设计下广义线性回归模型的子采样渐近性
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Dec 31;25(1):84. doi: 10.3390/e25010084.
8
Estimating the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of two diagnostic tests when one test is conducted on only a subsample of specimens.当仅对部分样本进行一项检测时,估计两项检测的一致性和诊断准确性。
Stat Med. 2012 Feb 28;31(5):436-48. doi: 10.1002/sim.4422. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
9
Robust and efficient subsampling algorithms for massive data logistic regression.用于海量数据逻辑回归的稳健且高效的子采样算法。
J Appl Stat. 2023 Apr 26;51(8):1427-1445. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2023.2205611. eCollection 2024.
10
Combining multiple data sources with different biases in state-space models for population dynamics.在用于种群动态的状态空间模型中结合具有不同偏差的多个数据源。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jun 8;13(6):e10154. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10154. eCollection 2023 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Expert Elicitation among Computational Modeling Studies in Health Research: A Systematic Review.健康研究中计算建模研究中使用专家 elicitation:系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jul;42(5):684-703. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211053794. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
2
EXPLICIT: a feasibility study of remote expert elicitation in health technology assessment.明确性:卫生技术评估中远程专家意见征集的可行性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Sep 4;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0527-0.
3
A preliminary approach to quantifying the overall environmental risks posed by development projects during environmental impact assessment.一种在环境影响评估期间量化开发项目所带来的整体环境风险的初步方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180982. eCollection 2017.
4
Spatial Aggregation and the Ecological Fallacy.空间聚集与生态谬误
Chapman Hall CRC Handb Mod Stat Methods. 2010;2010:541-558. doi: 10.1201/9781420072884-c30.
5
Interpreting meta-regression: application to recent controversies in antidepressants' efficacy.解释元回归:在抗抑郁药疗效的近期争议中的应用。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 30;32(17):2875-92. doi: 10.1002/sim.5766. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
6
Spatial parasite ecology and epidemiology: a review of methods and applications.空间寄生虫生态学和流行病学:方法与应用综述。
Parasitology. 2012 Dec;139(14):1870-87. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012000698. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
7
Socio-economic disparities in the burden of seasonal influenza: the effect of social and material deprivation on rates of influenza infection.社会经济差异对季节性流感负担的影响:社会和物质剥夺对流感感染率的影响。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 17;6(2):e17207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017207.
8
Multi-level modelling, the ecologic fallacy, and hybrid study designs.多层次建模、生态学谬误与混合研究设计。
Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;38(2):330-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp179.
9
Design issues in small-area studies of environment and health.环境与健康小区域研究中的设计问题。
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Aug;116(8):1098-104. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10817.

本文引用的文献

1
The Combination of Ecological and Case-Control Data.生态数据与病例对照数据的结合
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2008 Feb 1;70(1):73-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00628.x.
2
Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification.生态偏倚、混杂因素及效应修饰。
Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;18(1):269-74. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.1.269.
3
Divergent biases in ecologic and individual-level studies.生态学研究和个体水平研究中的不同偏差。
Stat Med. 1992 Jun 30;11(9):1209-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780110907.