Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Crit Care. 2009;13(6):1016. doi: 10.1186/cc8163. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
Great variability exists in data collection and coding of variables in studies on traumatic brain injury (TBI). This confounds comparison of results and analysis of data across studies. The difficulties in performing a meta-analysis of individual patient data were recently illustrated in the IMPACT project (International Mission on Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in TBI): merging data from 11 studies involved over 10 person years of work. However, these studies did confirm the great potential for advancing the field by this approach. Although randomized controlled trials remain the prime approach for investigating treatment effects, these can never address the many uncertainties concerning multiple treatment modalities in TBI. Pooling data from different studies may provide the best possible source of evidence we can get in a cost efficient way. Standardisation of data collection and coding is essential to this purpose. Recommendations hereto have been proposed by an interagency initiative in the US. These proposals deserve to be taken forward at an international level. This initiative may well constitute one of the most important steps forwards, paving the road for harvesting successful results in the near future.
创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 的研究中,数据收集和变量编码存在很大的差异。这使得跨研究比较结果和分析数据变得复杂。最近,IMPACT 项目(TBI 预后和临床试验设计国际使命)中说明了对个体患者数据进行荟萃分析的困难:合并来自 11 项研究的数据涉及超过 10 人年的工作。然而,这些研究确实证实了通过这种方法推进该领域的巨大潜力。虽然随机对照试验仍然是研究治疗效果的主要方法,但这些方法永远无法解决 TBI 中多种治疗方式的许多不确定性。从不同研究中汇集数据可能是我们以具有成本效益的方式获得的最佳证据来源。为此,数据收集和编码的标准化至关重要。美国的一个机构间倡议提出了相关建议。这些建议值得在国际层面上推进。这一举措很可能是向前迈出的最重要的一步之一,为在不久的将来取得成功的结果铺平了道路。