• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤的预后与临床试验设计:IMPACT研究

Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study.

作者信息

Maas Andrew I R, Marmarou Anthony, Murray Gordon D, Teasdale Sir Graham M, Steyerberg Ewout W

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):232-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0024.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2006.0024
PMID:17375987
Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health and socio-economic problem throughout the world. Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed to investigate the effectiveness of new therapies, but none have convincingly demonstrated benefit. Clinical trials in TBI pose complex methodological challenges and meeting these requires new approaches. The challenges are related to the heterogeneity of head injuries, to optimum analysis of outcome and to aspects of the design of trials. To address these, we have created the IMPACT database on TBI through merging individual patient data from eight RCTs and three observational surveys. This database forms a culture medium in which innovative approaches to improving trial design and analysis are being explored. We hypothesize that the statistical power of TBI trials may be increased by adjusting for heterogeneity with covariate adjustment and/or prognostic targeting, by exploiting the ordinal nature of the Glasgow Outcome Scale and by relating the outcome obtained in individual patients to their baseline prognostic risk. Extensive prognostic analysis was required as a first step towards our aim of optimizing the chance of demonstrating benefit of new therapies in future trials. The fruits of this analysis are reported in detail in the subsequent reports in this issue of the Journal of Neurotrauma. The results will lead to the development and validation of new prognostic models, which will be applied to deal with heterogeneity. The findings will be synthesized into recommendations for the design and analysis of future RCTs, with the expectation of increasing the likelihood of demonstrating the benefit of a truly effective new therapy or therapeutic agent in victims of a head injury.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是全球范围内的一个重大健康和社会经济问题。已经开展了许多随机对照试验(RCT)来研究新疗法的有效性,但没有一项试验令人信服地证明其益处。TBI的临床试验带来了复杂的方法学挑战,应对这些挑战需要新的方法。这些挑战与头部损伤的异质性、结局的最佳分析以及试验设计的各个方面有关。为了解决这些问题,我们通过合并来自八项RCT和三项观察性调查的个体患者数据,创建了TBI的IMPACT数据库。该数据库形成了一种培养基,正在其中探索改进试验设计和分析的创新方法。我们假设,通过协变量调整和/或预后靶向来调整异质性、利用格拉斯哥预后量表的序数性质以及将个体患者获得的结局与其基线预后风险相关联,可以提高TBI试验的统计效力。作为朝着我们在未来试验中优化证明新疗法益处机会这一目标迈出的第一步,需要进行广泛的预后分析。本期《神经创伤杂志》后续报告中详细报道了这一分析的成果。结果将导致新预后模型的开发和验证,这些模型将用于处理异质性。研究结果将综合成未来RCT设计和分析的建议,期望增加在头部受伤受害者中证明真正有效的新疗法或治疗药物益处的可能性。

相似文献

1
Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study.创伤性脑损伤的预后与临床试验设计:IMPACT研究
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):232-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0024.
2
New approaches to increase statistical power in TBI trials: insights from the IMPACT study.提高创伤性脑损伤试验统计效能的新方法:来自IMPACT研究的见解。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;101:119-24. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-78205-7_20.
3
Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: current problems and future solutions.创伤性脑损伤的临床试验:当前问题与未来解决方案
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2004;89:113-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0603-7_16.
4
IMPACT recommendations for improving the design and analysis of clinical trials in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.影响改善中重度创伤性脑损伤临床试验设计和分析的建议。
Neurotherapeutics. 2010 Jan;7(1):127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.020.
5
IMPACT database of traumatic brain injury: design and description.创伤性脑损伤IMPACT数据库:设计与描述
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):239-50. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0036.
6
Baseline characteristics and statistical power in randomized controlled trials: selection, prognostic targeting, or covariate adjustment?随机对照试验中的基线特征与统计效能:选择、预后靶向还是协变量调整?
Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2683-90. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181ab85ec.
7
Prospective independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury.前瞻性验证 IMPACT 模型作为严重创伤性脑损伤预后工具的研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):47-52. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1482. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
8
Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study.创伤性脑损伤的多变量预后分析:IMPACT研究结果
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):329-37. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0035.
9
Adjustment for strong predictors of outcome in traumatic brain injury trials: 25% reduction in sample size requirements in the IMPACT study.创伤性脑损伤试验中对预后强预测因素的调整:IMPACT研究中样本量要求减少25%。
J Neurotrauma. 2006 Sep;23(9):1295-303. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1295.
10
Prognostic value of cause of injury in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study.创伤性脑损伤中损伤原因的预后价值:IMPACT研究结果
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):281-6. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0030.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncertainty of risk estimates from clinical prediction models: rationale, challenges, and approaches.临床预测模型风险估计的不确定性:基本原理、挑战及应对方法。
BMJ. 2025 Feb 13;388:e080749. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080749.
2
ASA score is an independent predictor of 1-year outcome after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分是中重度创伤性脑损伤后1年预后的独立预测指标。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 6;33(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01338-x.
3
Associations between Electroencephalographic Variables, Early Post-Traumatic Seizure Risk, and Outcomes following Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
小儿重型创伤性脑损伤后脑电图变量、创伤后早期癫痫发作风险与预后之间的关联
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2022 Feb 28;13(4):364-371. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743500. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting mortality in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury: A retrospective analysis.开发并验证预测急性严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率的列线图:一项回顾性分析。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Oct;45(10):4931-4956. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07572-y. Epub 2024 May 9.
5
The Role of Nanotechnology in Understanding the Pathophysiology of Traumatic Brain Injury.纳米技术在理解创伤性脑损伤病理生理学中的作用。
Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2025;25(1):20-38. doi: 10.2174/0118715249291999240418112531.
6
Comparative Analysis of Clinical Severity and Outcomes in Penetrating Versus Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury Propensity Matched Cohorts.穿透性与钝性创伤性脑损伤倾向匹配队列的临床严重程度及结局的比较分析
Neurotrauma Rep. 2024 Apr 3;5(1):348-358. doi: 10.1089/neur.2024.0009. eCollection 2024.
7
Early systemic insults following traumatic brain injury: association with biomarker profiles, therapy for intracranial hypertension, and neurological outcomes-an analysis of CENTER-TBI data.创伤性脑损伤后早期全身损伤:与生物标志物谱、颅内压治疗和神经结局的关联——CENTER-TBI 数据分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Mar;50(3):371-384. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07324-8. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
8
Time spent above optimal cerebral perfusion pressure is not associated with failure to improve in outcome in traumatic brain injury.高于最佳脑灌注压的时间与创伤性脑损伤患者预后改善失败无关。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023 Dec 14;11(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00579-3.
9
Temporal Statistical Relationship between Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation (rSO) and Brain Tissue Oxygen Tension (PbtO) in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Canadian High Resolution-TBI (CAHR-TBI) Cohort Study.中重度创伤性脑损伤中局部脑氧饱和度(rSO)与脑组织氧分压(PbtO)之间的时间统计关系:一项加拿大高分辨率创伤性脑损伤(CAHR-TBI)队列研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 25;10(10):1124. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101124.
10
Effect of propranolol and clonidine after severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot randomized clinical trial.严重创伤性脑损伤后应用普萘洛尔和可乐定的效果:一项初步随机临床试验。
Crit Care. 2023 Jun 9;27(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04479-6.