• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单目与立体视网膜摄影在糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度分级中的比较。

Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1106, USA.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jun;51(6):3184-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4886. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.09-4886
PMID:20053978
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic photography for research classification of the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHODS

Monoscopic digital (MD) images were compared with stereo digital (SD) and film (SF) photographs from a 152-eye cohort with full-spectrum Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels for agreement on severity level, DR presence with ascending severity threshold, presence of DR index lesions, and repeatability of grading.

RESULTS

There was substantial agreement classifying ETDRS DR severity levels between MD and SF (kappa = 0.65, kappa(w) [linear weighted] = 0.87), MD and SD (kappa = 0.66, kappa(w) = 0.87), and SD and SF (kappa = 0.62, kappa(w) = 0.86) images. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference between MD and SF images (P = 0.53, Bhapkar test). The kappa agreement between MD and SF ranged from 0.80 to 0.94 for the presence or absence of eight ascending DR severity thresholds. Repeatability between the readers of the MD images was equal to or better than that of the readers of SD or SF images. Severity threshold grading repeatability between readers was similar with the MD and SF images. The kappa agreement between MD and SF for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. The kappa comparisons showed that performance of grading new vessels on the disc in MD images was slightly lower than that with the SF images.

CONCLUSIONS

Monoscopic photography can equal the reliability of stereo photography for full ETDRS DR severity scale grading.

摘要

目的

评估单眼和立体摄影在糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)严重程度的研究分类中的一致性。

方法

将 152 只眼的全谱早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)严重程度的单眼数字(MD)图像与立体数字(SD)和胶片(SF)照片进行比较,以评估严重程度分级、DR 随严重程度递增阈值的存在、DR 指数病变的存在以及分级的重复性方面的一致性。

结果

MD 和 SF(kappa=0.65,kappa(w)[线性加权]=0.87)、MD 和 SD(kappa=0.66,kappa(w)=0.87)以及 SD 和 SF(kappa=0.62,kappa(w)=0.86)图像之间对 ETDRS DR 严重程度分级具有高度一致性。边缘同质性分析发现 MD 和 SF 图像之间没有显著差异(P=0.53,Bhapkar 检验)。MD 和 SF 图像之间的kappa 一致性在 0.80 到 0.94 之间,用于确定八个递增 DR 严重程度阈值的存在或不存在。MD 图像的读者间重复性与 SD 或 SF 图像的读者间重复性相同或更好。读者间严重程度阈值分级的重复性与 MD 和 SF 图像相似。MD 和 SF 图像对识别糖尿病视网膜病变病变的kappa 一致性从中度到几乎完美。kappa 比较表明,MD 图像上视盘新生血管的分级性能略低于 SF 图像。

结论

单眼摄影术在全 ETDRS DR 严重程度分级方面可以与立体摄影术具有同等的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.单目与立体视网膜摄影在糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度分级中的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jun;51(6):3184-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4886. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
2
Mosaics versus Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy seven standard fields for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity.马赛克与早期治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变-评估糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度的七个标准视野。
Retina. 2011 Sep;31(8):1553-63. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182084273.
3
Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity.数字摄影与 ETDRS 眼底照相协议评估糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 1;52(7):4717-25. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6303.
4
Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.基于网络的压缩立体数码摄影与标准幻灯片胶片摄影在糖尿病视网膜病变诊断中的分级比较
Ophthalmology. 2007 Sep;114(9):1748-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.010. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
5
Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.非散瞳超广角视网膜成像与散瞳标准 7 区域 35mm 摄影及视网膜专科医师检查在糖尿病视网膜病变评估中的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;154(3):549-559.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.019. Epub 2012 May 23.
6
A quantitative system to evaluate diabetic retinopathy from fundus photographs.一种用于从眼底照片评估糖尿病视网膜病变的定量系统。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Jan;36(1):174-81.
7
Grading diabetic retinopathy severity from compressed digital retinal images compared with uncompressed images and film.比较压缩数字视网膜图像与非压缩图像和胶片对糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度的分级。
Retina. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(10):1651-61. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e3790b.
8
Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.用于糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的单视野数字眼底图像解读中的观察者间一致性。
Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):826-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.021.
9
Automated Retinal Imaging System (ARIS) compared with ETDRS protocol color stereoscopic retinal photography to assess level of diabetic retinopathy.自动化视网膜成像系统(ARIS)与 ETDRS 协议彩色立体视网膜摄影比较,评估糖尿病视网膜病变的程度。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Jun;14(6):515-22. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0270. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
10
Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy.对于既往记录为无糖尿病视网膜病变或轻度糖尿病视网膜病变的患者,用于年度视网膜检查的免散瞳数字成像替代方法。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;140(4):667-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.075. Epub 2005 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of a New Tabletop Non-mydriatic Fundus Camera for Single-Field Diabetic Retinopathy Detection: A Pilot Study.新型桌面式免散瞳眼底相机用于单视野糖尿病视网膜病变检测的性能:一项初步研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 17;17(7):e88198. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88198. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Mitigation of AI adoption bias through an improved autonomous AI system for diabetic retinal disease.通过改进的用于糖尿病视网膜疾病的自主人工智能系统减轻人工智能采用偏差。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Dec 19;7(1):369. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01389-x.
3
Comparison of Color Fundus Photography and Multicolor Fundus Imaging for Detection of Lesions in Diabetic Retinopathy and Retinal Vein Occlusion.
彩色眼底照相与多色眼底成像在糖尿病视网膜病变和视网膜静脉阻塞病变检测中的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 23;17:2515-2524. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S414603. eCollection 2023.
4
The Role of Medical Image Modalities and AI in the Early Detection, Diagnosis and Grading of Retinal Diseases: A Survey.医学影像模态与人工智能在视网膜疾病早期检测、诊断及分级中的作用:一项综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Aug 4;9(8):366. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9080366.
5
A computer-aided diagnosis system for detecting various diabetic retinopathy grades based on a hybrid deep learning technique.基于混合深度学习技术的用于检测各种糖尿病视网膜病变程度的计算机辅助诊断系统。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Jul;60(7):2015-2038. doi: 10.1007/s11517-022-02564-6. Epub 2022 May 11.
6
Imaging Modalities Employed in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Review and Meta-Analysis.糖尿病视网膜病变筛查中使用的成像方式:综述与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 29;11(10):1802. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101802.
7
Recently updated global diabetic retinopathy screening guidelines: commonalities, differences, and future possibilities.最近更新的全球糖尿病视网膜病变筛查指南:异同点及未来可能。
Eye (Lond). 2021 Oct;35(10):2685-2698. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01572-4. Epub 2021 May 11.
8
Comparison of montage with conventional stereoscopic seven-field photographs for assessment of ETDRS diabetic retinopathy severity.用于评估糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究组(ETDRS)糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度的蒙太奇照片与传统立体七视野照片的比较。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2019 Dec 13;5:51. doi: 10.1186/s40942-019-0201-z. eCollection 2019.
9
Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices.在基层医疗诊所中用于检测糖尿病视网膜病变的基于人工智能的自主诊断系统的关键试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Aug 28;1:39. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6. eCollection 2018.
10
Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment Variability Among Eye Care Providers in an Urban Teleophthalmology Program.城市远程眼科项目中眼科保健提供者之间糖尿病视网膜病变评估的变异性。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Apr;25(4):301-308. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0019. Epub 2018 Jul 24.