Department of Medical Oncolocy, Ankara University School of Medicine, Dikimevi, 06590 Ankara, Turkey.
Med Oncol. 2011 Mar;28(1):112-20. doi: 10.1007/s12032-009-9406-6. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
Diet and lifestyle related to socioeconomic status emerged as risk factors for gastric cancer in several studies. However, the results were not always consistent with the socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors independent from education as a measure of socioeconomic status. Two hundred and fifty-three patients with gastric cancer diagnosed in 2005 and equal number of control subjects were interviewed for several characteristics and diet. Matching was done for age, gender, city of residence and also for the level of education. Despite these matching preferences, patients had significantly lower income when compared to the control subjects (P = 0.0001). Higher rate of patients were smoking more than 2 packs/day of cigarettes (P = 0.018). Also significantly higher rate of control subjects were using antibiotics (P = 0.002). Coffee (P < 0.0001), salad (P = 0.006), bread (P = 0.005), vegetable-derived cooking oil (P = 0.003) consumptions appeared as highly protective factors against gastric cancer in univariate analysis in the present trial. In multivariate analysis, significant risk reducing factors were bread (P = 0.005) and coffee consumption (P = 0.0001) other than the level income (P = 0.002). In conclusion, the goal of obtaining comparable socioeconomic status by including the level of education in the matching criteria was not met in our study because of the difference in income level. The only risk reducing factor that was not in accordance with income level was the unexpectedly higher rate of bread consumption in control group.
饮食和生活方式与社会经济地位相关,这已在几项研究中被确定为胃癌的危险因素。然而,这些结果并不总是与社会经济地位一致。本研究的目的是评估与教育无关的独立危险因素作为社会经济地位的衡量标准。2005 年诊断出的 253 例胃癌患者和相同数量的对照组患者接受了多项特征和饮食的访谈。匹配因素包括年龄、性别、居住城市以及教育水平。尽管进行了这些匹配偏好,但与对照组相比,患者的收入明显较低(P = 0.0001)。更多的患者吸烟超过 2 包/天(P = 0.018)。同样,对照组使用抗生素的比例也明显更高(P = 0.002)。在本试验的单因素分析中,咖啡(P < 0.0001)、沙拉(P = 0.006)、面包(P = 0.005)、蔬菜衍生烹饪油(P = 0.003)的消费被认为是胃癌的高度保护因素。在多因素分析中,除了收入水平(P = 0.002)外,面包(P = 0.005)和咖啡消费(P = 0.0001)是显著的风险降低因素。总之,由于收入水平的差异,本研究通过将教育水平纳入匹配标准来获得可比的社会经济地位的目标没有实现。唯一与收入水平不符的风险降低因素是对照组中面包消费率出乎意料地更高。