• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类传递推理的神经系统相互作用。

Neural system interactions underlying human transitive inference.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Hippocampus. 2010 Aug;20(8):894-901. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20735.

DOI:10.1002/hipo.20735
PMID:20054816
Abstract

Human problem solving relies on multiple strategies supported by dynamic neural network interactions. The transitive inference (TI) problem solving task can be accomplished by the extraction of relations among stimuli or by responding to reinforcement histories of items using associative learning. Relational and associative strategies are assumed to rely on the hippocampus and caudate nucleus, respectively; which compete to control behavior. However, we found that increased recruitment of both systems in TI is correlated with greater accuracy and awareness, and reduced associative responding to single items. Contrary to prior assumptions, the hippocampus and caudate interact cooperatively to facilitate successful TI. We suggest that the dynamics of the relationship between the hippocampus and caudate depends critically upon task demands.

摘要

人类解决问题依赖于多种策略,这些策略由动态神经网络相互作用支持。传递推理 (TI) 问题解决任务可以通过提取刺激之间的关系或通过使用联想学习来响应项目的强化历史来完成。关系和联想策略分别被认为依赖于海马体和尾状核;它们相互竞争以控制行为。然而,我们发现 TI 中两个系统的募集增加与更高的准确性和意识相关,并且对单个项目的联想反应减少。与先前的假设相反,海马体和尾状核相互协作以促进 TI 的成功。我们认为,海马体和尾状核之间关系的动态取决于任务需求。

相似文献

1
Neural system interactions underlying human transitive inference.人类传递推理的神经系统相互作用。
Hippocampus. 2010 Aug;20(8):894-901. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20735.
2
Function of hippocampus in "insight" of problem solving.海马体在问题解决“洞察力”中的作用。
Hippocampus. 2003;13(3):316-23. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10069.
3
Cognitive integrity predicts transitive inference performance bias and success.认知完整性可预测传递性推理表现偏差和成功率。
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1314-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.009. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
4
An investigation of learning strategy supporting transitive inference performance in humans compared to other species.一项关于与其他物种相比支持人类传递性推理表现的学习策略的调查。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(8):1370-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.004. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
5
Hippocampal dampening during a relational memory task.在关系记忆任务期间海马体抑制
Behav Neurosci. 2004 Aug;118(4):667-75. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.667.
6
A critical role for the anterior hippocampus in relational memory: evidence from an fMRI study comparing associative and item recognition.前海马体在关系记忆中的关键作用:来自一项比较联想和项目识别的功能磁共振成像研究的证据。
Hippocampus. 2004;14(1):5-8. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10182.
7
Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.刺激可排序性和强化历史对鸽子传递性反应的影响。
Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):161-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
8
Interaction between the human hippocampus and the caudate nucleus during route recognition.在路线识别过程中人类海马体与尾状核之间的相互作用。
Neuron. 2004 Aug 5;43(3):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.009.
9
Navigation ability dependent neural activation in the human brain: an fMRI study.人类大脑中与导航能力相关的神经激活:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neurosci Res. 2006 Aug;55(4):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2006.04.009. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
10
Hippocampal lesion and transitive inference: dissociation of inference-based and reinforcement-based strategies in pigeons.海马体损伤与传递性推理:鸽子中基于推理和基于强化策略的分离
Hippocampus. 2015 Feb;25(2):219-26. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22366. Epub 2014 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A direct test of competitive versus cooperative episodic-procedural network dynamics in human memory.直接测试人类记忆中竞争与合作情节-程序网络动态的作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Oct 20;32(21):4715-4732. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab512.
2
The Complex Nature of Hippocampal-Striatal Interactions in Spatial Navigation.空间导航中海马体与纹状体相互作用的复杂本质。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jun 21;12:250. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00250. eCollection 2018.
3
Dynamic functional connectivity shapes individual differences in associative learning.
动态功能连接塑造了联想学习中的个体差异。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov;37(11):3911-3928. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23285.
4
Impaired inference in a case of developmental amnesia.一例发育性遗忘症患者的推理能力受损。
Hippocampus. 2016 Oct;26(10):1291-302. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22606. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
Implicit Value Updating Explains Transitive Inference Performance: The Betasort Model.内隐价值更新解释传递性推理表现:贝塔排序模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Sep 25;11(9):e1004523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004523. eCollection 2015.
6
Relational learning and transitive expression in aging and amnesia.衰老与失忆中的关系学习及传递性表达。
Hippocampus. 2016 Feb;26(2):170-84. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22501. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
7
Noninvasive functional and anatomical imaging of the human medial temporal lobe.人类内侧颞叶的无创功能和解剖成像。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Mar 16;7(4):a021840. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021840.
8
Effects of spatial training on transitive inference performance in humans and rhesus monkeys.空间训练对人类和恒河猴传递性推理表现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Oct;40(4):477-89. doi: 10.1037/xan0000038. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
9
Transitivity performance, relational hierarchy knowledge and awareness: results of an instructional framing manipulation.及物性表现、关系层级知识与意识:教学框架操作的结果。
Hippocampus. 2013 Dec;23(12):1259-68. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22163. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
10
Integrating events across levels of consciousness.整合不同意识层面的事件。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jun 14;7:68. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00068. eCollection 2013.