Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Molière Longchamp, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Eur Spine J. 1992 Jun;1(1):29-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00302139.
Bed rest is usually considered an efficient treatment for acute low back pain. However, the optimal duration of bed rest is still being discussed. The recommended periods vary from 2 days to 2 weeks. The duration of optimum length is an important topic given the economical and physiological drawbacks of prolonged inactivity. The purpose of this work is to measure objectively the efficacy of two different durations of bed rest through a dynamometric measure of trunk function. Some 51 male patients, students or self-employed, being treated for acute low back pain were randomized into two groups. Group I was prescribed a bed rest period of 3 days and group II, a period of 7 days. We used a multi-axis isoinertial trunk testing dynamometric device (Isostation B200, Isotechnologies, USA). Patients were all assessed on day 1 and also on day 5 for group I or on day 9 for group II. The variables measured in the sagittal plane were isometric torques in flexion and extension, unresisted range of motion, average dynamic torques and average velocities. Patients were also asked to fill in a visual analogue pain scale on both assessment days. The improvement of all performance measures were important and highly significant (P < 0.001) in both groups. The results of the functional testing and the visual analogue pain scale showed no significant differences between the groups. In these relatively young and motivated patients, a duration of bed rest of 3 days resulted in the same objective functional improvement of trunk function and pain rating as a period of 7 days. This shorter duration should be considered as preferable, given the same objective results but important physiological and economical advantages.
卧床休息通常被认为是治疗急性腰痛的有效方法。然而,卧床休息的最佳持续时间仍在讨论中。建议的时间从 2 天到 2 周不等。鉴于长时间不活动会带来经济和生理上的弊端,最佳持续时间是一个重要的话题。本研究的目的是通过对躯干功能的动态测量来客观地衡量两种不同卧床休息持续时间的疗效。大约 51 名男性患者,学生或个体经营者,因急性腰痛接受治疗,随机分为两组。I 组规定卧床休息 3 天,II 组规定卧床休息 7 天。我们使用多轴等速躯干测试测力装置(Isostation B200,Isotechnologies,美国)。所有患者在第 1 天和第 5 天(第 1 天)进行评估,I 组在第 5 天进行评估,II 组在第 9 天进行评估。在矢状面测量的变量是屈伸的等长扭矩、无阻力运动范围、平均动态扭矩和平均速度。患者还在两次评估日填写视觉模拟疼痛量表。两组的所有性能指标都有显著改善(P<0.001)。功能测试和视觉模拟疼痛量表的结果显示两组之间没有显著差异。在这些相对年轻和积极的患者中,3 天的卧床休息时间与 7 天的卧床休息时间一样,能使躯干功能和疼痛评分得到相同的客观改善。鉴于相同的客观结果,但具有重要的生理和经济优势,应考虑较短的持续时间。