• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用家庭网络数据为儿童保护服务提供支持。

Using family network data in child protection services.

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Te Pūnaha Matatini, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Oct 29;14(10):e0224554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224554. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0224554
PMID:31661513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6818793/
Abstract

Preventing child abuse is a unifying goal. Making decisions that affect the lives of children is an unenviable task assigned to social services in countries around the world. The consequences of incorrectly labelling children as being at risk of abuse or missing signs that children are unsafe are well-documented. Evidence-based decision-making tools are increasingly common in social services provision but few, if any, have used social network data. We analyse a child protection services dataset that includes a network of approximately 5 million social relationships collected by social workers between 1996 and 2016 in New Zealand. We test the potential of information about family networks to improve accuracy of models used to predict the risk of child maltreatment. We simulate integration of the dataset with birth records to construct more complete family network information by including information that would be available earlier if these databases were integrated. Including family network data can improve the performance of models relative to using individual demographic data alone. The best models are those that contain the integrated birth records rather than just the recorded data. Having access to this information at the time a child's case is first notified to child protection services leads to a particularly marked improvement. Our results quantify the importance of a child's family network and show that a better understanding of risk can be achieved by linking other commonly available datasets with child protection records to provide the most up-to-date information possible.

摘要

预防儿童虐待是一个统一的目标。做出影响儿童生活的决策是一项艰巨的任务,这项任务被分配给了世界各国的社会服务机构。错误地将儿童标记为有受虐待风险或遗漏儿童不安全迹象的后果有案可查。基于证据的决策工具在社会服务提供中越来越普遍,但很少有(如果有的话)使用社交网络数据。我们分析了一个儿童保护服务数据集,该数据集包含了 1996 年至 2016 年间新西兰社会工作者收集的大约 500 万个社交关系网络。我们测试了家庭网络信息在提高用于预测儿童虐待风险的模型准确性方面的潜力。我们模拟了数据集与出生记录的整合,通过包括如果这些数据库整合后更早获得的信息,构建更完整的家庭网络信息。包含家庭网络数据可以提高模型的性能,而不仅仅是使用个人人口统计数据。表现最好的模型是那些包含整合出生记录的模型,而不仅仅是记录的数据。在儿童保护服务首次接到儿童案件通知时能够获得这些信息,会导致显著的改善。我们的结果量化了儿童家庭网络的重要性,并表明通过将其他常用数据集与儿童保护记录相链接,以提供最新的信息,可以更好地了解风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a46/6818793/3b56cc1041aa/pone.0224554.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a46/6818793/5f3dca9203d6/pone.0224554.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a46/6818793/3b56cc1041aa/pone.0224554.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a46/6818793/5f3dca9203d6/pone.0224554.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a46/6818793/3b56cc1041aa/pone.0224554.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Using family network data in child protection services.利用家庭网络数据为儿童保护服务提供支持。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 29;14(10):e0224554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224554. eCollection 2019.
2
Medical social work practice in child protection in China: A multiple case study in Shanghai hospitals.中国儿童保护中的医务社会工作实践:上海医院的多案例研究
Soc Work Health Care. 2017 May-Jun;56(5):352-366. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2016.1265634. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
Can child deaths be prevented? The Arizona Child Fatality Review Program experience.儿童死亡可以预防吗?亚利桑那州儿童死亡审查项目的经验。
Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):e11. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.e11.
4
Testing if Social Services Prevent Fatal Child Maltreatment Among a Sample of Children Previously Known to Child Protective Services.在曾被儿童保护服务机构知晓的儿童样本中,测试社会服务是否能预防致命的儿童虐待。
Child Maltreat. 2016 Aug;21(3):239-49. doi: 10.1177/1077559516657890. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
5
Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals' child welfare attitudes.儿童保护中的决策:关于虐待证实、风险评估及干预建议的国际比较研究,以及专业人员儿童福利态度的作用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Nov;49:63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
6
Reducing maltreatment recurrence through home visitation: A promising intervention for child welfare involved families.通过家访减少虐待复发:一种有前途的儿童福利相关家庭干预措施。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Dec;86:55-66. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: decision-making models.评估受虐待风险儿童的安全性:决策模型
Child Welfare. 1994 May-Jun;73(3):229-45.
8
THE SAAF STUDY: evaluation of the Safeguarding Children Assessment and Analysis Framework (SAAF), compared with management as usual, for improving outcomes for children and young people who have experienced, or are at risk of, maltreatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.SAAF研究:与常规管理相比,对保护儿童评估与分析框架(SAAF)进行评估,以改善遭受或有遭受虐待风险的儿童和青少年的结局:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Nov 20;15:453. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-453.
9
Cohort profile: Children in Need Census (CIN) records of children referred for social care support in England.队列资料简介:英格兰因社会关怀支持而被转介的儿童的“儿童需求普查”(CIN)记录。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e023771. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023771.
10
The decision of out-of-home placement in residential care after parental neglect: Empirically testing a psychosocial model.父母忽视后儿童被安置在寄宿照料机构的决定:对一种社会心理模型的实证检验
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Nov;49:35-49. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Child welfare worker perspectives on documentation and case recording practices in Canada: A mixed-methods study protocol.加拿大儿童福利工作者对文件记录和案例记录实践的看法:一项混合方法研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0316238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316238. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Resource Profile: The New Zealand Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI).数据资源简介:新西兰综合数据基础设施(IDI)
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):1027. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz054.
2
HUMAN DECISIONS AND MACHINE PREDICTIONS.人类决策与机器预测
Q J Econ. 2018 Feb 1;133(1):237-293. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjx032. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
3
Predictive Analytics for City Agencies: Lessons from Children's Services.面向城市机构的预测分析:儿童服务的经验教训。
Big Data. 2017 Sep;5(3):189-196. doi: 10.1089/big.2016.0052. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
4
Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments.公平预测与差异影响:累犯预测工具中的偏见研究。
Big Data. 2017 Jun;5(2):153-163. doi: 10.1089/big.2016.0047.
5
Black-White Differences in Child Maltreatment Reports and Foster Care Placements: A Statistical Decomposition Using Linked Administrative Data.儿童虐待报告与寄养安置中的黑白差异:基于关联行政数据的统计分解
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Mar;21(3):414-420. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2242-3.
6
OxRec model for assessing risk of recidivism: ethics.用于评估累犯风险的OxRec模型:伦理学
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;3(9):808-9. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30175-4.
7
Predictive Risk Modelling to Prevent Child Maltreatment and Other Adverse Outcomes for Service Users: Inside the 'Black Box' of Machine Learning.用于预防服务对象遭受儿童虐待及其他不良后果的预测风险建模:深入机器学习的“黑匣子”
Br J Soc Work. 2016 Jun;46(4):1044-1058. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv031. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
8
Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: derivation and external validation of a scalable tool.预测出狱后暴力再犯罪:一种可扩展工具的推导与外部验证
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;3(6):535-43. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00103-6. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
9
Predictive modeling: potential application in prevention services.预测模型:在预防服务中的潜在应用。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 May;48(5):509-19. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
10
Preventing severe and fatal child maltreatment: making the case for the expanded use and integration of data.预防儿童严重虐待和致命虐待:支持扩大数据使用与整合的理由
Child Welfare. 2013;92(2):59-75.