Suppr超能文献

尼古丁依赖的诊断和统计手册诊断标准的系统评价。

A systematic review of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual diagnostic criteria for nicotine dependence.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2010 May;35(5):373-82. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.013. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual diagnostic criteria for nicotine dependence (DSM-ND) are based on the proposition that dependence is a syndrome that can be diagnosed only when a minimum of 3 of the 7 proscribed features are present. The DSM-ND criteria are an accepted research measure, but the validity of these criteria has not been subjected to a systematic evaluation. To systematically review evidence of validity and reliability for the DSM-ND criteria, a literature search was conducted of 16 national and international databases. Each article with original data was independently reviewed by two or more reviewers. In total, 380 potentially relevant articles were examined and 169 were reviewed in depth. The DSM-ND criteria have seen wide use in research settings, but sensitivity and specificity are well below the accepted standards for clinical applications. Predictive validity is generally poor. The 7 DSM-ND criteria are regarded as having face validity, but no data support a 3-symptom ND diagnostic threshold, or a 4-symptom withdrawal syndrome threshold. The DSM incorrectly states that daily smoking is a prerequisite for withdrawal symptoms. The DSM shows poor to modest concurrence with all other measures of nicotine dependence, smoking behaviors and biological measures of tobacco use. The data support the DSM-ND criteria as a valid measure of nicotine dependence severity for research applications. However, the data do not support the central premise of a 3-symptom diagnostic threshold, and no data establish that the DSM-ND criteria provide an accurate diagnosis of nicotine dependence.

摘要

DSM-ND 的诊断标准基于这样一种假设,即依赖是一种综合征,只有当存在规定的 7 个特征中的至少 3 个时才能诊断。DSM-ND 标准是一种公认的研究措施,但这些标准的有效性尚未经过系统评估。为了系统地审查 DSM-ND 标准的有效性和可靠性证据,对 16 个国家和国际数据库进行了文献检索。每个包含原始数据的文章都由两名或更多审阅者独立审查。总共检查了 380 篇潜在相关文章,并对 169 篇进行了深入审查。DSM-ND 标准在研究环境中得到了广泛应用,但灵敏度和特异性远低于临床应用的公认标准。预测有效性通常较差。DSM-ND 的 7 个标准被认为具有表面有效性,但没有数据支持 3 个症状 ND 诊断阈值或 4 个症状戒断综合征阈值。DSM 错误地指出,每日吸烟是戒断症状的前提。DSM 与尼古丁依赖的所有其他测量、吸烟行为和烟草使用的生物测量的一致性较差。数据支持 DSM-ND 标准作为尼古丁依赖严重程度的有效研究措施。然而,数据并不支持 3 个症状诊断阈值的中心前提,也没有数据表明 DSM-ND 标准能准确诊断尼古丁依赖。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验