• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样术在双胎妊娠中的应用:哪种是最佳的取样技术?

Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in twin gestations: which is the best sampling technique?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;202(4):365.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.016. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.016
PMID:20060095
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the fetal loss rate <24 weeks and the preterm premature rupture of the membranes <34 weeks' gestation according to type of invasive procedure and to sampling techniques in twins.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of 204 twin pregnancies, who underwent amniocentesis (100) or chorionic villus sampling (104).

RESULTS

Fetal loss rate <4 weeks was 3.85% in chorionic villus sampling group and 4.00% in amniocentesis group (P value not significant). According to sampling technique, fetal loss rate was 4.17% (chorionic villus sampling 1 puncture), 2.70% (amniocentesis 1 puncture), 3.75% (chorionic villus sampling 2 punctures), and 4.76% (amniocentesis 2 punctures), (P values not significant). Preterm premature rupture of the membranes rate <34 weeks was 8.2% chorionic villus sampling group and 10% in amniocentesis group (P value not significant). According to sampling technique, preterm premature rupture of the membranes rate was 12.5% (chorionic villus sampling 1 puncture), 8.1% (amniocentesis 1 puncture), 6.9% (chorionic villus sampling 2 punctures), and 11.1 % (amniocentesis 2 punctures), (P values not significant).

CONCLUSION

Double entry technique does not affect significantly the outcomes evaluated, in both amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.

摘要

目的

比较经侵袭性操作和取样技术诊断的双胎妊娠 24 周前胎儿丢失率和<34 周胎膜早破率。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究 204 例双胎妊娠,行羊膜腔穿刺术(100 例)或绒毛膜活检术(104 例)。

结果

绒毛膜活检组 4 周内胎儿丢失率为 3.85%,羊膜腔穿刺组为 4.00%(P 值无显著差异)。根据取样技术,胎儿丢失率分别为绒毛膜活检组 1 穿刺 4.17%,羊膜腔穿刺组 1 穿刺 2.70%,绒毛膜活检组 2 穿刺 3.75%,羊膜腔穿刺组 2 穿刺 4.76%(P 值无显著差异)。<34 周胎膜早破率绒毛膜活检组为 8.2%,羊膜腔穿刺组为 10%(P 值无显著差异)。根据取样技术,胎膜早破率分别为绒毛膜活检组 1 穿刺 12.5%,羊膜腔穿刺组 1 穿刺 8.1%,绒毛膜活检组 2 穿刺 6.9%,羊膜腔穿刺组 2 穿刺 11.1%(P 值无显著差异)。

结论

双针取样技术并不显著影响羊膜腔穿刺术和绒毛膜活检术的结局。

相似文献

1
Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in twin gestations: which is the best sampling technique?羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样术在双胎妊娠中的应用:哪种是最佳的取样技术?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;202(4):365.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.016. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
2
Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling.双胎妊娠的产前诊断:孕中期羊膜腔穿刺术与孕早期绒毛取样的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;82(1):49-56.
3
Second-trimester amniocentesis vs. chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations.中期妊娠羊膜腔穿刺术与绒毛取样术在多胎妊娠产前诊断中的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Nov;20(5):476-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00826.x.
4
Infant morbidity following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping.羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样用于产前核型分析后的婴儿发病率。
BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):394-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00413.x.
5
Obstetrical Outcomes of Amniocentesis or Chorionic Villus Sampling in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies.双绒毛膜性双胎妊娠行羊膜腔穿刺术或绒毛活检术的产科结局。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 May 13;34(18):e142. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e142.
6
The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities.绒毛取样用于细胞遗传学异常早期产前诊断的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 9;320(10):609-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903093201001.
7
First-trimester fetal reduction to a singleton infant or twins: outcome in relation to the final number and karyotyping before reduction by transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.孕早期减胎至单胎或双胎:与经腹绒毛取样减胎前最终胎儿数量及核型分析相关的结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;191(6):2035-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.003.
8
Maternal complications following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping.用于产前核型分析的羊膜穿刺术和绒毛取样后的母体并发症。
BJOG. 2003 Apr;110(4):392-9.
9
Outcome of first-trimester chorionic villus sampling for genetic investigation in multiple pregnancy.多胎妊娠早期绒毛取样进行遗传学检查的结果
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Mar;17(3):209-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00379.x.
10
First trimester chorionic villus sampling in twin gestations.双胎妊娠的孕早期绒毛取样
Am J Perinatol. 1996 Oct;13(7):413-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994380.

引用本文的文献

1
Amniocentesis and Risk of Fetal Loss in Dichorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancy: A Case-Control Study.双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠的羊膜腔穿刺术与胎儿丢失风险:一项病例对照研究
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Jun;45(6):713-719. doi: 10.1002/pd.6777. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
2
ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy.国际妇产科超声学会(ISUOG)实践指南(更新版):超声在双胎妊娠中的作用
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb;65(2):253-276. doi: 10.1002/uog.29166. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
3
Amniocentesis in Twin Pregnancies: Risk Factors of Fetal Loss.
双胎妊娠的羊膜腔穿刺术:胎儿丢失的危险因素。
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 31;11(7):1937. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071937.
4
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening and Diagnostic Testing from Korean Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine: (2) Invasive Diagnostic Testing for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities.韩国母胎医学会产前非整倍体筛查和诊断检测临床实践指南:(2)胎儿染色体异常的有创性诊断检测。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jan 25;36(4):e26. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e26.
5
Single or double needle insertion in twin's amniocentesis: Does the technique influence the risk of complications?双胎羊膜腔穿刺术单针或双针穿刺:该技术会影响并发症风险吗?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 May 15;3:100051. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100051. eCollection 2019 Jul.
6
Obstetrical Outcomes of Amniocentesis or Chorionic Villus Sampling in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies.双绒毛膜性双胎妊娠行羊膜腔穿刺术或绒毛活检术的产科结局。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 May 13;34(18):e142. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e142.
7
Genome-wide maps of distal gene regulatory enhancers active in the human placenta.人类胎盘活跃的远端基因调控增强子的全基因组图谱。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 27;13(12):e0209611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209611. eCollection 2018.
8
Ultrasound surveillance in twin pregnancy: An update for practitioners.双胎妊娠的超声监测:给从业者的最新信息
Ultrasound. 2018 Nov;26(4):193-205. doi: 10.1177/1742271X18794013. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
9
Screening and Invasive Testing in Twins.双胞胎的筛查与侵入性检测
J Clin Med. 2014 Jul 29;3(3):865-82. doi: 10.3390/jcm3030865.
10
Current principles and practice of ethics and law in perinatal medicine.围产期医学中的伦理与法律的当前原则及实践
Curr Health Sci J. 2014 Jul-Sep;40(3):162-9. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.40.03.02. Epub 2014 Aug 4.