• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非传统手动推进式轮椅原型评估。

Evaluation of a wheelchair prototype with non-conventional, manual propulsion.

机构信息

Centre de recherche et d'innovation sur le sport, université Claude-Bernard-Lyon-1, Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Mar;53(2):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2009.12.001
PMID:20060796
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of a user satisfaction questionnaire on a new type of lever-propelled wheelchair designed to avoid the discomfort and potential repetitive strain injuries related to conventional hand-rim propulsion.

METHODS

Seventeen participants filled out a questionnaire to rate their conventional wheelchair and the prototype (after 2 days' use) in terms of comfort, adjustability, steering/ride, manoeuvrability, stability when crossing obstacles, safety, weight, size, portability and appearance. Overall satisfaction was also scored.

RESULTS

According to the user questionnaire results, the lever-propelled prototype chair was rated as significantly superior than conventional wheelchairs in terms of comfort, safety and overall satisfaction. The prototype was rated significantly inferior in terms of size, adaptability, appearance and crossing obstacles.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the prototype wheelchair is highly acceptable and comfortable and can be recommended to disabled sportspersons. The prototype's weak points are mainly related to ergonomic aspects, which could be improved in future models.

摘要

目的

评估一种新型脚踏驱动轮椅的用户满意度问卷结果,该轮椅旨在避免与传统手轮驱动相关的不适和潜在重复性劳损损伤。

方法

17 名参与者填写了一份问卷,对他们的常规轮椅和原型(使用 2 天后)在舒适度、可调节性、转向/行驶、操纵性、过障碍物时的稳定性、安全性、重量、尺寸、便携性和外观方面进行了评分。还对总体满意度进行了评分。

结果

根据用户问卷结果,脚踏驱动原型椅在舒适度、安全性和总体满意度方面明显优于传统轮椅。原型在尺寸、适应性、外观和过障碍物方面的评价明显较低。

结论

我们得出结论,原型轮椅高度可接受且舒适,并可推荐给残疾运动员。原型的弱点主要与人体工程学方面有关,这可以在未来的模型中得到改进。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a wheelchair prototype with non-conventional, manual propulsion.非传统手动推进式轮椅原型评估。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Mar;53(2):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
2
Comparative ergonomic assessment of manual wheelchairs by paraplegic users.截瘫患者对手动轮椅的人体工程学比较评估
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Jul;8(4):305-13. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2012.719060. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
3
User assessment of manual wheelchair ride comfort and ergonomics.用户对手动轮椅乘坐舒适性和人体工程学的评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Apr;81(4):490-4. doi: 10.1053/mr.2000.3845.
4
Alternative modes of manual wheelchair ambulation: an overview.手动轮椅移动的替代模式:综述
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Oct;80(10):765-77. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200110000-00012.
5
Comfort and stability of wheelchair backrests according to the TAWC (tool for assessing wheelchair discomfort).根据TAWC(轮椅不适评估工具)评估轮椅靠背的舒适度和稳定性。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(3):223-7. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.938365. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
6
Physiological evaluation of a newly designed lever mechanism for wheelchairs.一种新设计的轮椅杠杆机构的生理评估
J Med Eng Technol. 1993 Nov-Dec;17(6):232-40. doi: 10.3109/03091909309006331.
7
Is manual wheelchair satisfaction related to active lifestyle and participation in people with a spinal cord injury?手动轮椅满意度与脊髓损伤患者的积极生活方式和参与度有关吗?
Spinal Cord. 2011 Apr;49(4):560-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.150. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
8
The effect of rear-wheel position on seating ergonomics and mobility efficiency in wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries: a pilot study.后轮位置对脊髓损伤轮椅使用者座位人体工程学和移动效率的影响:一项初步研究。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;41(1):65-74. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.01.0065.
9
Comparison of metabolic cost, performance, and efficiency of propulsion using an ergonomic hand drive mechanism and a conventional manual wheelchair.使用符合人体工程学的手驱动机构和传统手动轮椅比较推进的代谢成本、性能和效率。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.238. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
10
Energy expenditure, and comfort in a modified wheelchair for people with hemiplegia: a controlled trial.偏瘫患者使用改良轮椅的能量消耗与舒适度:一项对照试验。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Sep;2(5):255-60. doi: 10.1080/17483100701343624.

引用本文的文献

1
Tire Deformation-Based Regulation of Braking Torque in Manual Wheelchairs Equipped with Reverse Locking Modules.基于轮胎变形的配备反向锁定模块的手动轮椅制动扭矩调节
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 17;20(6):e0325504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325504. eCollection 2025.
2
Metabolic Cost and Mechanical Efficiency of a Novel Handle-Based Device for Wheelchair Propulsion.新型手柄式轮椅推进器的代谢成本和机械效率。
J Rehabil Med. 2022 Nov 23;54:jrm00346. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.1503.
3
Predicting manual wheelchair initiation movement with EMG activity during over ground propulsion.
基于地面推进过程中的肌电活动预测手动轮椅启动运动。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2022 Mar;45(2):262-269. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1778352. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
4
Comparison of metabolic cost, performance, and efficiency of propulsion using an ergonomic hand drive mechanism and a conventional manual wheelchair.使用符合人体工程学的手驱动机构和传统手动轮椅比较推进的代谢成本、性能和效率。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.238. Epub 2013 Sep 6.