• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

截瘫患者对手动轮椅的人体工程学比较评估

Comparative ergonomic assessment of manual wheelchairs by paraplegic users.

作者信息

Gil-Agudo Angel, Solís-Mozos Marta, del-Ama Antonio J, Crespo-Ruiz Beatriz, de la Peña-González Ana Isabel, Pérez-Nombela Soraya

机构信息

Biomechanics and Technical Aids Unit, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, National Hospital for Spinal Cord Injury. SESCAM, Toledo, Spain.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Jul;8(4):305-13. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2012.719060. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

DOI:10.3109/17483107.2012.719060
PMID:23078201
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to describe and test the reliability of a comprehensive product-centered approach to assessing functional performance and wheelchair user perceptions on device ergonomics and satisfaction of performance. A pilot study was implemented using this approach to evaluate differences among four manual wheelchairs.

METHOD

Six wheelchair users with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) at the thoracic level and with no previous upper limbs impairment were recruited for this study. After finishing circuit tasks, subjects were asked to complete a questionnaire about ergonomic wheelchair characteristics (manoeuvrability, stability, comfort and ease of propulsion) and satisfaction about task performance. On the other hand, objective data were recorded during user performance as the time required to complete each test, kinetic wheelchair propulsion data obtained with two SMARTWheels® and physiological parameters (heart rate and physiological index).

RESULTS

Kuschall Champion® and Otto Bock Voyage® wheelchairs were ranked best for most ergonomic aspects specially in manoeuvrability (p < 0.05). Less time was required to execute most of the circuit tasks in both wheelchair models (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This approach proposed highlight the importance of looking both kinds of information, user perception and user functional performance when evaluating a wheelchair or comparing across devices.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述并测试一种以产品为中心的综合方法的可靠性,该方法用于评估功能性能以及轮椅使用者对设备人体工程学和性能满意度的看法。采用这种方法进行了一项试点研究,以评估四种手动轮椅之间的差异。

方法

招募了六名胸段完全性脊髓损伤(SCI)且既往无上肢损伤的轮椅使用者参与本研究。完成巡回任务后,要求受试者完成一份关于轮椅人体工程学特征(可操作性、稳定性、舒适性和推进 ease)以及对任务表现满意度的问卷。另一方面,在使用者执行任务期间记录客观数据,包括完成每项测试所需的时间、使用两个SMARTWheels®获得的轮椅推进动力学数据以及生理参数(心率和生理指标)。

结果

Kuschall Champion®和奥托博克Voyage®轮椅在大多数人体工程学方面排名最佳,特别是在可操作性方面(p < 0.05)。两种轮椅型号执行大多数巡回任务所需的时间较少(p < 0.05)。

结论

所提出的这种方法强调了在评估轮椅或跨设备比较时,同时考虑用户感知和用户功能性能这两种信息的重要性。

相似文献

1
Comparative ergonomic assessment of manual wheelchairs by paraplegic users.截瘫患者对手动轮椅的人体工程学比较评估
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Jul;8(4):305-13. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2012.719060. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
2
Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair.一款推圈激活式动力辅助轮椅的评估
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 May;82(5):702-8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.20836.
3
User assessment of manual wheelchair ride comfort and ergonomics.用户对手动轮椅乘坐舒适性和人体工程学的评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Apr;81(4):490-4. doi: 10.1053/mr.2000.3845.
4
Is manual wheelchair satisfaction related to active lifestyle and participation in people with a spinal cord injury?手动轮椅满意度与脊髓损伤患者的积极生活方式和参与度有关吗?
Spinal Cord. 2011 Apr;49(4):560-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.150. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
5
The effect of rear-wheel position on seating ergonomics and mobility efficiency in wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries: a pilot study.后轮位置对脊髓损伤轮椅使用者座位人体工程学和移动效率的影响:一项初步研究。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 Jan-Feb;41(1):65-74. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.01.0065.
6
Energy cost of propulsion in standard and ultralight wheelchairs in people with spinal cord injuries.脊髓损伤患者使用标准轮椅和超轻型轮椅时的推进能量消耗。
Phys Ther. 1999 Feb;79(2):146-58.
7
The influence of verbal training and visual feedback on manual wheelchair propulsion.言语训练和视觉反馈对手动轮椅推进的影响。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009 Mar;4(2):86-94. doi: 10.1080/17483100802613685.
8
Evaluation of a wheelchair prototype with non-conventional, manual propulsion.非传统手动推进式轮椅原型评估。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Mar;53(2):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
9
A new design for an old concept of wheelchair pushrim.一种针对旧款轮椅轮辋概念的新设计。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012 May;7(3):234-41. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.629327. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
10
Filter frequency selection for manual wheelchair biomechanics.手动轮椅生物力学的滤波频率选择
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 May-Jun;39(3):323-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Modular control of gait after incomplete spinal cord injury: differences between sides.不完全性脊髓损伤后步态的模块化控制:双侧差异
Spinal Cord. 2017 Jan;55(1):79-86. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.99. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
2
Development, construction, and content validation of a questionnaire to test mobile shower commode usability.用于测试移动淋浴马桶可用性的问卷的开发、构建及内容验证。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Winter;21(1):77-86. doi: 10.1310/sci2101-77.