Department of Cognitive & Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Brain Lang. 2010 Feb;112(2):101-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
Apraxic patients are known for deficits in producing and comprehending skilled movements. Two experiments tested their implicit and explicit knowledge about manipulable objects in order to examine whether such deficits accompany impairment in the conceptual representation of manipulation features. An eyetracking method was used to test implicit knowledge (Experiment 1): participants viewed a visual display on a computer screen and touched the corresponding object in response to an auditory input. Manipulation relationship among objects was not task-relevant, and thus the assessment of manipulation knowledge was implicit. Like the non-apraxic control patients, apraxic patients fixated on an object picture (e.g., "typewriter") that was manipulation-related to a target word (e.g., 'piano') significantly more often than an unrelated object picture (e.g., "bucket") as well as a visual control (e.g., "couch"). However, this effect emerged later than in the non-apraxic control group, suggesting impaired access to manipulation features in the apraxic group. In the semantic judgment task (Experiment 2), participants were asked to make an explicit judgment about the relationship of picture triplets of manipulable objects by choosing the pair with similar manipulation features. Apraxic patients performed significantly worse on this task than the non-apraxic control group. Both implicit and explicit measures of manipulation knowledge show that apraxia is not merely a perceptuomotor deficit of skilled movements, but results in a concomitant impairment in representing manipulation features and accessing them for cognitive processing.
失用症患者的动作产生和理解能力存在缺陷。本研究通过两个实验检验了他们对可操作物体的内隐和外显知识,以考察这些缺陷是否伴随着操作特征概念表征的损伤。采用眼动追踪法来测试内隐知识(实验 1):参与者观看电脑屏幕上的视觉显示,然后根据听觉输入触摸相应的物体。物体之间的操作关系与任务无关,因此操作知识的评估是内隐的。与非失用症对照组患者一样,失用症患者注视与目标词(如“piano”)相关的操作相关物体图片(如“typewriter”)的次数明显多于不相关的物体图片(如“bucket”)和视觉控制图片(如“couch”)。然而,这种效应的出现时间晚于非失用症对照组,表明失用症组在操作特征的获取方面存在受损。在语义判断任务(实验 2)中,要求参与者通过选择具有相似操作特征的配对来对可操作物体的图片三重奏进行明确的判断。失用症患者在这个任务上的表现明显比非失用症对照组差。操作知识的内隐和外显测量都表明,失用症不仅仅是动作熟练的知觉运动缺陷,还导致了操作特征的代表和认知加工中对其的获取的同时损伤。