Suppr超能文献

动作障碍患者在操作特征上的受损:来自眼动和语义判断任务的证据。

Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive & Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2010 Feb;112(2):101-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

Abstract

Apraxic patients are known for deficits in producing and comprehending skilled movements. Two experiments tested their implicit and explicit knowledge about manipulable objects in order to examine whether such deficits accompany impairment in the conceptual representation of manipulation features. An eyetracking method was used to test implicit knowledge (Experiment 1): participants viewed a visual display on a computer screen and touched the corresponding object in response to an auditory input. Manipulation relationship among objects was not task-relevant, and thus the assessment of manipulation knowledge was implicit. Like the non-apraxic control patients, apraxic patients fixated on an object picture (e.g., "typewriter") that was manipulation-related to a target word (e.g., 'piano') significantly more often than an unrelated object picture (e.g., "bucket") as well as a visual control (e.g., "couch"). However, this effect emerged later than in the non-apraxic control group, suggesting impaired access to manipulation features in the apraxic group. In the semantic judgment task (Experiment 2), participants were asked to make an explicit judgment about the relationship of picture triplets of manipulable objects by choosing the pair with similar manipulation features. Apraxic patients performed significantly worse on this task than the non-apraxic control group. Both implicit and explicit measures of manipulation knowledge show that apraxia is not merely a perceptuomotor deficit of skilled movements, but results in a concomitant impairment in representing manipulation features and accessing them for cognitive processing.

摘要

失用症患者的动作产生和理解能力存在缺陷。本研究通过两个实验检验了他们对可操作物体的内隐和外显知识,以考察这些缺陷是否伴随着操作特征概念表征的损伤。采用眼动追踪法来测试内隐知识(实验 1):参与者观看电脑屏幕上的视觉显示,然后根据听觉输入触摸相应的物体。物体之间的操作关系与任务无关,因此操作知识的评估是内隐的。与非失用症对照组患者一样,失用症患者注视与目标词(如“piano”)相关的操作相关物体图片(如“typewriter”)的次数明显多于不相关的物体图片(如“bucket”)和视觉控制图片(如“couch”)。然而,这种效应的出现时间晚于非失用症对照组,表明失用症组在操作特征的获取方面存在受损。在语义判断任务(实验 2)中,要求参与者通过选择具有相似操作特征的配对来对可操作物体的图片三重奏进行明确的判断。失用症患者在这个任务上的表现明显比非失用症对照组差。操作知识的内隐和外显测量都表明,失用症不仅仅是动作熟练的知觉运动缺陷,还导致了操作特征的代表和认知加工中对其的获取的同时损伤。

相似文献

1
Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks.
Brain Lang. 2010 Feb;112(2):101-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
2
Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: evidence from eyetracking.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;59:13-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
3
Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects.
Cognition. 2006 Jan;98(3):223-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010.
4
Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 May;23(2-3):361-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
5
Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects.
Brain Lang. 2002 Aug;82(2):179-99. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00014-7.
6
Apraxia is not associated to a disproportionate naming impairment for manipulable objects.
Brain Cogn. 2003 Nov;53(2):412-5. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00156-8.
7
Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jan;234(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4432-4. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
8
Deficient allo-centric visuospatial processing contributes to apraxic deficits in sub-acute right hemisphere stroke.
J Neuropsychol. 2020 Jun;14(2):242-259. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12191. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Semantic memory in object use.
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Oct;47(12):2634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 May 29.
10
Deficient body structural description contributes to apraxic end-position errors in imitation.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107150. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107150. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms and neuroanatomy of response selection in tool and non-tool action tasks: Evidence from left-hemisphere stroke.
Cortex. 2023 Oct;167:335-350. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.012. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
4
Treating limb apraxia via action semantics: a preliminary study.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Aug;31(7):1145-1162. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1762672. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Reduced competition between tool action neighbors in left hemisphere stroke.
Cortex. 2019 Nov;120:269-283. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.021. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
Learning Is Better with the Hands Free: The Role of Posture in the Memory of Manipulable Objects.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0159108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159108. eCollection 2016.
8
Putting concepts into context.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1015-27. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7.
9
Impaired Communication Between the Dorsal and Ventral Stream: Indications from Apraxia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Feb 1;10:8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00008. eCollection 2016.
10
Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jan;234(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4432-4. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

本文引用的文献

2
Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jun;61(6):825-50. doi: 10.1080/17470210701623605.
3
Lexical-semantic activation in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia: evidence from eye movements.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Apr;20(4):592-612. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20056.
4
Word processing in Parkinson's disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):743-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.007. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
5
Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects.
Cognition. 2006 Jan;98(3):223-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010.
6
Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 May;23(2-3):361-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
7
At the root of embodied cognition: cognitive science meets neurophysiology.
Brain Cogn. 2004 Oct;56(1):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.003.
10
Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):30-46. doi: 10.1162/089892903321107800.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验