Chen Yong, Briesacher Becky A, Field Terry S, Tjia Jennifer, Lau Denys T, Gurwitz Jerry H
Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, 01605, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 11;170(1):89-95. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.469.
Serious safety concerns related to the use of antipsychotics have not decreased the prescribing of these agents to nursing home (NH) residents. We assessed the extent to which resident clinical characteristics and institutional prescribing practice were associated with antipsychotic prescribing.
Antipsychotic prescribing was assessed for a nationwide, cross-sectional population of 16 586 newly admitted NH residents in 2006. We computed facility-level antipsychotic rates based on the previous year's (2005) prescribing patterns. Poisson regressions with generalized estimating equations were used to identify the likelihood of resident-level antipsychotic medication use in 2006, given 2005 facility-level prescribing pattern and NH resident indication for antipsychotic therapy (psychosis, dementia, and behavioral disturbance).
More than 29% (n = 4818) of study residents received at least 1 antipsychotic medication in 2006. Of the antipsychotic medication users, 32% (n = 1545) had no identified clinical indication for this therapy. Residents entering NHs with the highest facility-level antipsychotic rates were 1.37 times more likely to receive antipsychotics relative to those entering the lowest prescribing rate NHs, after adjusting for potential clinical indications (risk ratio [RR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.51). The elevated risk associated with facility-level prescribing rates was apparent for only NH residents with dementia but no psychosis (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.23-1.59) and residents without dementia or psychosis (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.24-1.91).
The NH antipsychotic prescribing rate was independently associated with the use of antipsychotics in NH residents. Future research is needed to determine why such a prescribing culture exists and whether it could result in adverse health consequences.
与使用抗精神病药物相关的严重安全问题并未减少疗养院(NH)居民使用这些药物的处方量。我们评估了居民临床特征和机构处方实践与抗精神病药物处方之间的关联程度。
对2006年全国范围内16586名新入住NH的居民进行了抗精神病药物处方评估。我们根据上一年(2005年)的处方模式计算了机构层面的抗精神病药物使用率。使用带有广义估计方程的泊松回归来确定在2005年机构层面的处方模式以及NH居民抗精神病治疗指征(精神病、痴呆和行为障碍)的情况下,2006年居民使用抗精神病药物的可能性。
2006年超过29%(n = 4818)的研究居民接受了至少一种抗精神病药物治疗。在使用抗精神病药物的居民中,32%(n = 1545)没有明确的该治疗临床指征。在调整潜在临床指征后,进入抗精神病药物使用率最高机构的居民接受抗精神病药物治疗的可能性是进入处方率最低机构居民的1.37倍(风险比[RR],1.37;95%置信区间[CI],1.24 - 1.51)。与机构层面处方率相关的风险升高仅在患有痴呆但无精神病的NH居民(RR,1.40;95% CI,1.23 - 1.59)以及无痴呆或精神病的居民中明显(RR,1.54;95% CI,1.24 - 1.91)。
NH的抗精神病药物处方率与NH居民使用抗精神病药物独立相关。未来需要进行研究以确定为何存在这种处方文化以及它是否会导致不良健康后果。