Reynolds C F, Kupfer D J, Buysse D J, Coble P A, Yeager A
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213.
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Apr;148(4):432-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.4.432.
The authors review the usefulness, reliability, and validity of recently proposed subtypes of primary insomnia. DSM-III uses "primary insomnia" to indicate chronic insomnia not associated with other diagnosable mental or medical disorders, whereas the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) recognizes three subtypes: psychophysiological insomnia, idiopathic insomnia, and sleep state misperception.
After reviewing all of the primary source references for each insomnia disorder in the ICSD and all of the additional primary sources cited in each of these, the authors conducted an automated literature search using Medline. Of the 48 primary sources located, the authors selected 27 studies that were reported in peer-reviewed journals, had the largest available subject groups, used diagnostic reliability procedures, and included control groups.
The studies reviewed contained limited empirical support for the proposed distinction between idiopathic and psychophysiological insomnia. Sleep state misperception appears, however, to be a highly prevalent feature of chronic insomnia generally, rather than only a specific disorder per se.
The authors conclude that there is not yet sufficient empirical evidence to warrant the abandonment of DSM-III-R "primary insomnia" and the adoption of the ICSD subtypes in DSM-IV. However, they affirm the heuristic value of the ICSD subtypes and the need for field trials to compare the performance characteristics of the DSM-III-R and ICSD systems with respect to 1) interrater reliability, 2) effects of rater expertise (generalist versus specialist) on rates of agreement, and 3) effects of polysomnographic data on rates of agreement.
作者回顾了最近提出的原发性失眠亚型的实用性、可靠性和有效性。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)使用“原发性失眠”来表示与其他可诊断的精神或医学疾病无关的慢性失眠,而《国际睡眠障碍分类》(ICSD)则认可三种亚型:心理生理性失眠、特发性失眠和睡眠状态感知障碍。
在查阅了ICSD中每种失眠障碍的所有原始参考文献以及其中每一项所引用的所有其他原始资料后,作者使用Medline进行了自动文献检索。在所找到的48篇原始资料中,作者选择了27项发表在同行评审期刊上、拥有最大可用受试群体、采用诊断可靠性程序并包含对照组的研究。
所回顾的研究对特发性失眠和心理生理性失眠之间的拟议区分提供的实证支持有限。然而,睡眠状态感知障碍似乎通常是慢性失眠的一个高度普遍的特征,而不仅仅是一种特定的疾病本身。
作者得出结论,目前尚无足够的实证证据支持放弃DSM-III-R中的“原发性失眠”并在DSM-IV中采用ICSD的亚型。然而,他们肯定了ICSD亚型的启发价值以及进行现场试验以比较DSM-III-R和ICSD系统在以下方面的性能特征的必要性:1)评分者间信度;2)评分者专业知识(普通医生与专科医生)对一致性率的影响;3)多导睡眠图数据对一致性率的影响。