• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维特尔标准与损伤严重度评分(ISS)之间的相关性评估:一种院前严重创伤患者分诊的新方法。

Assessment of the correlation between the Vittel criteria and the ISS score: A novel approach to pre-hospital severe trauma patient's triage.

作者信息

Laajimi Sondes, Bhiri Sana, Chebbi Nabil, Bradai Haifa, Belkhiria Amal, Loghmari Dorra, Chebili Naoufel, Mbarek Rabeb, Kahloul Mohamed

机构信息

Emergency medical service (EMS/SAMU03) Sahloul University Hospital, Sousse,Tunisia.

Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.

出版信息

Tunis Med. 2024 Dec 5;102(12):1055-1061. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i12.5198.

DOI:10.62438/tunismed.v102i12.5198
PMID:39748694
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11770800/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Introduction-Aim: Validated triage tools such as the Vittel criteria are essential to improve the care of trauma patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the Vittel triage criteria and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) to improve the accuracy of pre-hospital triage.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal study of all trauma patients transported by EMS over a two-year period (November 2021- November 2023). Vittel and (ISS) scores were calculated on admission. Predictive Vittel criteria were defined by independent risk factors for ISS>15 using a multiple logistic regression model with p-value < 0.05 and/or sensitivity (se)>50%, with positive Youden index (Yi).

RESULTS

A total of 461 trauma patients were transported by EMS during the study period were included. The sex ratio was 5.3 and road traffic accidents accounted for 77.2%. An ISS>15 was found in 41% of participants, 25% required ICU admission and 23.9% died within 30 days. Using the above selection criteria, we identified seven key predictive criteria (OR CI 95%, se%, Yi) Glasgow coma scale<13(3.16 [1.91 5.24],44,0.25); fall>6 m(4.031[1.61-10.08],10,0.07); severe burn(23.89[10.21-55.93],6,0.02); Pelvic fracture (4.93 [1.19-20.32], 28, 0.25),suspected spinal cord injury(6.89 [2.79-16.96], 6, 0.05); Fluid resuscitation>1000 ml(-, 60.0. 11); Catecholamine (2.02 [1.09-3.75],51.0.27). Physiological variables (se 30%, Yi 0.16) and pre-hospital resuscitation(se 46%, Yi 0.18) were among the most relevant categories for predicting severity, similar to the full Vittel score.

CONCLUSION

Seven criteria were associated with severe trauma (ISS score >15). Physiological variables and pre-hospital resuscitation were significant categories that may help to predict the severity of trauma and its impact on patients.

摘要

未标注

引言-目的:经过验证的分诊工具,如维特尔标准,对于改善创伤患者的护理至关重要。本研究的目的是评估维特尔分诊标准与损伤严重程度评分(ISS)之间的相关性,以提高院前分诊的准确性。

方法

我们对在两年期间(2021年11月至2023年11月)由紧急医疗服务(EMS)转运的所有创伤患者进行了一项纵向研究。入院时计算维特尔评分和(ISS)评分。使用p值<0.05和/或敏感度(se)>50%且约登指数(Yi)为正的多元逻辑回归模型,通过ISS>15的独立危险因素定义预测性维特尔标准。

结果

在研究期间,共有461例由EMS转运的创伤患者被纳入。男女比例为5.3,道路交通事故占77.2%。41%的参与者ISS>15,25%需要入住重症监护病房,23.9%在30天内死亡。使用上述选择标准,我们确定了七个关键预测标准(OR CI 95%,se%,Yi):格拉斯哥昏迷量表<13(3.16 [1.91 5.24],44,0.25);坠落>6米(4.031[1.61 - 10.08],10,0.07);严重烧伤(23.89[10.21 - 55.93],6,0.02);骨盆骨折(4.93 [1.19 - 20.32],28,0.25),疑似脊髓损伤(6.89 [2.79 - 16.96],6,0.05);液体复苏>1000毫升(-,60.0. 11);儿茶酚胺(2.02 [1.09 - 3.75],51.0.27)。生理变量(se 30%,Yi 0.16)和院前复苏(se 46%,Yi 0.18)是预测严重程度最相关的类别,与完整的维特尔评分相似。

结论

七个标准与严重创伤(ISS评分>15)相关。生理变量和院前复苏是重要类别,可能有助于预测创伤的严重程度及其对患者的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/ec9ecd3357af/capture6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/2a87aa62ecf3/capture1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/479d646ff509/capture2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/3a9090d5cae0/capture4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/4667a683eb3e/capture5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/ec9ecd3357af/capture6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/2a87aa62ecf3/capture1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/479d646ff509/capture2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/3a9090d5cae0/capture4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/4667a683eb3e/capture5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8e/11770800/ec9ecd3357af/capture6.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the correlation between the Vittel criteria and the ISS score: A novel approach to pre-hospital severe trauma patient's triage.维特尔标准与损伤严重度评分(ISS)之间的相关性评估:一种院前严重创伤患者分诊的新方法。
Tunis Med. 2024 Dec 5;102(12):1055-1061. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i12.5198.
2
Correlation between field triage criteria and the injury severity score of trauma patients in a French inclusive regional trauma system.法国全覆盖区域创伤体系中创伤患者现场分类标准与创伤严重度评分的相关性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 5;27(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0652-0.
3
Evaluation and Comparison of Different Prehospital Triage Scores of Trauma Patients on In-Hospital Mortality.创伤患者院内死亡率的不同院前分诊评分评估与比较。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Jul-Aug;23(4):543-550. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1549627. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
[Comparison of Trauma Triage System in Prehospital Care Based on the Clinical Parameters with the ISS Score in Severely Injured Patients in the Czech Republic].[基于临床参数的捷克共和国院前创伤分诊系统与重伤患者损伤严重度评分的比较]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(2):120-126.
5
[Reliability of emergency medical field triage : Exemplified by traffic accident victims].[急诊医疗现场分诊的可靠性:以交通事故受害者为例]
Anaesthesist. 2013 Dec;62(12):973-80. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2255-x. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
6
Crash Telemetry-Based Injury Severity Prediction is Equivalent to or Out-Performs Field Protocols in Triage of Planar Vehicle Collisions.基于碰撞数据的损伤严重度预测在平面车辆碰撞的分诊中与现场方案等效或优于现场方案。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):356-362. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004515. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
7
Validation of prehospital trauma triage criteria for motor vehicle collisions.验证用于机动车事故的创伤分诊标准。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):755-61. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000091.
8
Prehospital Reverse Shock Index Times Glasgow Coma Scale as a Predictor for Trauma Intervention in Paediatric Trauma Patients.院前反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷量表作为儿童创伤患者创伤干预的预测指标。
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Mar;60(3):162018. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162018. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
9
Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage.修订创伤评分与损伤严重程度评分之间的相关性:对院前创伤分诊的启示
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):263-270. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489019. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
10
Predictive performance of prehospital trauma triage tools for resuscitative interventions within 24 hours in high-risk or life-threatening prehospital trauma patients.院前创伤分诊工具对高危或危及生命的院前创伤患者24小时内复苏干预的预测性能。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01188-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation between field triage criteria and the injury severity score of trauma patients in a French inclusive regional trauma system.法国全覆盖区域创伤体系中创伤患者现场分类标准与创伤严重度评分的相关性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 5;27(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0652-0.
2
French pre-hospital trauma triage criteria: Does the "pre-hospital resuscitation" criterion provide additional benefit in triage?法国院前创伤分诊标准:“院前复苏”标准在分诊中是否能带来额外益处?
World J Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 4;3(3):68-73. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i3.68.
3
Trauma care inside and outside business hours: comparison of process quality and outcome indicators in a German level-1 trauma center.
非工作时间内外的创伤护理:德国一级创伤中心的流程质量与结果指标比较
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Oct 31;22:62. doi: 10.1186/s13049-014-0062-2.
4
Triaging the right patient to the right place in the shortest time.在最短的时间内将合适的患者分诊到合适的地方。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Aug;113(2):226-33. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu231. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
5
Evaluation of the performance of French physician-staffed emergency medical service in the triage of major trauma patients.评估法国医生配备的紧急医疗服务在重大创伤患者分诊中的表现。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jun;76(6):1476-83. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000239.
6
The development of a data-matching algorithm to define the 'case patient'.用于定义“病例患者”的数据匹配算法的开发。
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Feb;37(1):54-9. doi: 10.1071/AH11161.
7
Benefit of the Vittel criteria to determine the need for whole body scanning in a severe trauma patient.维特尔标准在确定严重创伤患者全身扫描需求中的获益。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2012 May;93(5):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
8
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.《伤员现场分类指南:国家现场分类专家小组 2011 年的建议》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Jan 13;61(RR-1):1-20.
9
Differentiation of confirmed major trauma patients and potential major trauma patients using pre-hospital trauma triage criteria.使用院前创伤分诊标准对确诊的严重创伤患者和潜在的严重创伤患者进行区分。
Injury. 2011 Sep;42(9):889-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.035. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
10
Mechanism, glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP): a new simple prehospital triage score to predict mortality in trauma patients.机制、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和动脉压(MGAP):一种新的简单的创伤前分诊评分,可预测创伤患者的死亡率。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):831-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cc4a67.