• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简化的出血审计分诊创伤(sBATT)评分的推导与验证:一种用于机动车碰撞受伤的重大创伤患者的简化创伤评分

Derivation and validation of the simplified BleedingAudit Triage Trauma (sBATT) score: a simplified trauma score for major trauma patients injured in motor vehicle collisions.

作者信息

Nutbeam Tim, Stassen Willem, Foote Emily, Ageron Francois-Xavier

机构信息

IMPACT: Centre for Post-Collision Research, Innovation and Translation, Exeter, UK

Emergency Department, Univeristy Hospitals Plymouth NHS Foundation Trust, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 26;14(12):e090517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090517.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090517
PMID:39725425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11683913/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a simplified Bleeding Audit Triage Trauma (sBATT) score for use by lay persons, or in areas and environments where physiological monitoring equipment may be unavailable or inappropriate.

DESIGN

The sBATT was derived from the original BATT, which included prehospital systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate, respiratory rate, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), age and trauma mechanism. Variables suitable for lay interpretation without monitoring equipment were included (age, level of consciousness, absence of radial pulse, tachycardia and trapped status). The sBATT was validated using data from the UK Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) registry.

SETTING

Data sourced from prehospital observations from multiple trauma systems in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

70 027 motor vehicle collision (MVC) patients from the TARN registry (2012-2019). Participants included were those involved in MVCs, with exclusion criteria being incomplete data or non-trauma-related admissions.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Death within 24 hours of MVC. Secondary: need for trauma intervention.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 70 027 MVC patients, 1976 (3%) died within 24 hours. The sBATT showed an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.91) for predicting 24-hour mortality, surpassing other trauma scores such as the Shock Index and Assessment of Blood Consumption score. Sensitivity was 96% and specificity 72%, with a negative likelihood ratio below 0.1, indicating strong rule-out capability. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent performance across varying SBP and GCS thresholds. The sBATT was equally effective across sexes with no significant predictive discrepancies.

CONCLUSIONS

The sBATT is a novel, simplified tool that performs well at predicting early death in the TARN dataset. It demonstrates high predictive accuracy for 24-hour mortality and need for trauma intervention. Further research should validate sBATT in diverse populations and real-world scenarios to confirm its utility and applicability.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种简化的出血审计分诊创伤(sBATT)评分,供非专业人员使用,或在生理监测设备可能无法获取或不适用的区域和环境中使用。

设计

sBATT源自原始的BATT,后者包括院前收缩压(SBP)、心率、呼吸频率、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、年龄和创伤机制。纳入了适合非专业人员在无监测设备情况下解读的变量(年龄、意识水平、桡动脉搏动消失、心动过速和被困状态)。使用来自英国创伤审计研究网络(TARN)登记处的数据对sBATT进行验证。

设置

数据源自英国多个创伤系统的院前观察。

参与者

来自TARN登记处(2012 - 2019年)的70027名机动车碰撞(MVC)患者。纳入的参与者为那些涉及机动车碰撞的患者,排除标准为数据不完整或非创伤相关入院。

干预措施

不适用。

主要和次要结局指标

机动车碰撞后24小时内死亡。次要指标:创伤干预需求。

结果

在70027名机动车碰撞患者队列中,1976名(3%)在24小时内死亡。sBATT在预测24小时死亡率方面的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.90(95%CI:0.90至0.91),超过了其他创伤评分,如休克指数和失血评估评分。敏感性为96%,特异性为72%,阴性似然比低于0.1,表明具有很强的排除能力。敏感性分析证实,在不同的SBP和GCS阈值下表现一致。sBATT在不同性别中同样有效,无显著的预测差异。

结论

sBATT是一种新颖、简化的工具,在TARN数据集中预测早期死亡方面表现良好。它在预测24小时死亡率和创伤干预需求方面显示出高预测准确性。进一步的研究应在不同人群和现实场景中验证sBATT,以确认其效用和适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11683913/e83f58461d04/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11683913/5c64e4bdcaf3/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11683913/e83f58461d04/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11683913/5c64e4bdcaf3/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11683913/e83f58461d04/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Derivation and validation of the simplified BleedingAudit Triage Trauma (sBATT) score: a simplified trauma score for major trauma patients injured in motor vehicle collisions.简化的出血审计分诊创伤(sBATT)评分的推导与验证:一种用于机动车碰撞受伤的重大创伤患者的简化创伤评分
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 26;14(12):e090517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090517.
2
Validation of the Pediatric Physiological and Anatomical Triage Score in Injured Pediatric Patients.验证小儿生理与解剖分诊评分在受伤小儿患者中的应用。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):363-369. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004552. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Mechanism, glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP): a new simple prehospital triage score to predict mortality in trauma patients.机制、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和动脉压(MGAP):一种新的简单的创伤前分诊评分,可预测创伤患者的死亡率。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):831-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cc4a67.
4
Crash Telemetry-Based Injury Severity Prediction is Equivalent to or Out-Performs Field Protocols in Triage of Planar Vehicle Collisions.基于碰撞数据的损伤严重度预测在平面车辆碰撞的分诊中与现场方案等效或优于现场方案。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):356-362. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004515. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
5
Predictive performance of prehospital trauma triage tools for resuscitative interventions within 24 hours in high-risk or life-threatening prehospital trauma patients.院前创伤分诊工具对高危或危及生命的院前创伤患者24小时内复苏干预的预测性能。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01188-x.
6
Sex-disaggregated analysis of the injury patterns, outcome data and trapped status of major trauma patients injured in motor vehicle collisions: a prespecified analysis of the UK trauma registry (TARN).对机动车碰撞中受伤的严重创伤患者的损伤模式、结局数据和被困状态进行性别分类分析:英国创伤登记处(TARN)的预设分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 3;12(5):e061076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061076.
7
Derivation and Validation of a Score Using Prehospital Data to Identify Adults With Trauma Requiring Early Laparotomy.利用院前数据推导和验证用于识别需要早期剖腹手术的创伤成年患者的评分系统。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2145860. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45860.
8
Derivation and validation of an easy-to-compute trauma score that improves prognostication of mortality or the Trauma Rating Index in Age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Respiratory rate and Systolic blood pressure (TRIAGES) score.一种易于计算的创伤评分的推导和验证,该评分可改善死亡率或创伤评分指数在年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、呼吸频率和收缩压(TRIAGES)评分中的预后。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 21;23(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2636-x.
9
Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.运用 META 方法对大量伤员事件进行院前分诊用于早期外科评估:医院创伤登记处的回顾性验证。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1040-6. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
Development and validation of a new simplified anatomic trauma mortality score.一种新的简化解剖创伤死亡率评分的制定和验证。
Injury. 2019 May;50(5):1125-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.027. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Triage of road injury casualties - the role of bystanders: a scoping review.道路伤害伤员的分诊——旁观者的作用:一项范围综述
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 21;33(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01455-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The predictive value of the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) in the outcome of multi-traumatic patients compared to the estimated Injury Severity Score (eISS).卡帕拉创伤评分(KTS)对多发创伤患者结局的预测价值与预计损伤严重程度评分(eISS)的比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 May 14;24(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00989-w.
2
Identification of major hemorrhage in trauma patients in the prehospital setting: diagnostic accuracy and impact on outcome.院前环境下创伤患者大出血的识别:诊断准确性及其对预后的影响。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jan 12;9(1):e001214. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001214. eCollection 2024.
3
Nine golden codes: improving the accuracy of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) dispatch-a retrospective, multi-organisational study in the East of England.
九项黄金准则:提高直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)派遣的准确性——一项在英格兰东部进行的回顾性、多机构研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 12;31(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01094-w.
4
Early identification of bleeding in trauma patients: external validation of traumatic bleeding scores in the Swiss Trauma Registry.创伤患者出血的早期识别:瑞士创伤登记处创伤性出血评分的外部验证。
Crit Care. 2022 Sep 28;26(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04178-8.
5
A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision.德尔菲研究对救援和临床主题专家在机动车碰撞后对患者进行救援的情况。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 20;30(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01029-x.
6
Use of tranexamic acid in major trauma: a sex-disaggregated analysis of the Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage (CRASH-2 and CRASH-3) trials and UK trauma registry (Trauma and Audit Research Network) data.氨甲环酸在重大创伤中的应用:对纤维蛋白溶解抑制剂在重大出血中的临床随机对照试验(CRASH-2 和 CRASH-3 试验)和英国创伤登记处(创伤和审核研究网络)数据的性别细分分析
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;129(2):191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.032. Epub 2022 May 18.
7
Sex-disaggregated analysis of the injury patterns, outcome data and trapped status of major trauma patients injured in motor vehicle collisions: a prespecified analysis of the UK trauma registry (TARN).对机动车碰撞中受伤的严重创伤患者的损伤模式、结局数据和被困状态进行性别分类分析:英国创伤登记处(TARN)的预设分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 3;12(5):e061076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061076.
8
Do entrapment, injuries, outcomes and potential for self-extrication vary with age? A pre-specified analysis of the UK trauma registry (TARN).诱捕、伤害、结果和自我脱险的可能性是否随年龄而变化?对英国创伤登记处(TARN)的预先指定分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Mar 5;30(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00989-w.
9
A comparison of the demographics, injury patterns and outcome data for patients injured in motor vehicle collisions who are trapped compared to those patients who are not trapped.比较机动车事故中被困和未被困患者的人口统计学、损伤模式和结局数据。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 14;29(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00818-6.
10
Validation of the BATT score for prehospital risk stratification of traumatic haemorrhagic death: usefulness for tranexamic acid treatment criteria.BATT 评分用于院前创伤性出血性死亡风险分层的验证:对于氨甲环酸治疗标准的有用性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 6;29(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00827-5.