• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰 K10 和扩展 K10 筛查量表评估抑郁和焦虑障碍的有效性。

The validity of the Dutch K10 and extended K10 screening scales for depressive and anxiety disorders.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, EMGO Institute, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2010 Mar 30;176(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.01.012. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.01.012
PMID:20071036
Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch version of the Kessler-10 (K10) as well as an extended version (EK10) in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care. Data are from 1607 participants (18 through 65 years, 68.8% female) of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), recruited from 65 general practitioners. Participants completed the K10, extended with five additional questions focusing on core anxiety symptoms, and were evaluated with the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI lifetime version 2.1) to assess DSM-IV disorders (major depressive disorder, dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, agoraphobia). Reliability (Cronbach's alpha) of the Dutch K10 was 0.94. Based on Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for the K10 for any depressive and/or anxiety disorder was found to be 0.87. The extended questions on the EK10 significantly improved the detection of anxiety disorders in particular. With a cut-off point of 20, the K10 reached a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.81 for any depressive and/or anxiety disorder. For the EK10, a cut-off point of 20 and/or at least one positive answer on the additional questions provided a sensitivity of 0.90 and a specificity of 0.75 for detecting any depressive and/or anxiety disorder. The Dutch version of the K10 is appropriate for screening depressive disorders in primary care, while the EK10 is preferred in screening for both depressive and anxiety disorders.

摘要

本研究旨在验证荷兰版 Kessler-10(K10)及其扩展版(EK10)在初级保健中筛查抑郁和焦虑障碍的有效性。数据来自荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究(NESDA)的 1607 名参与者(18 至 65 岁,68.8%为女性),他们从 65 名全科医生中招募而来。参与者完成了 K10,并扩展了五个额外的问题,重点关注核心焦虑症状,并用世界卫生组织复合国际诊断访谈(CIDI 终身版 2.1)进行评估,以评估 DSM-IV 障碍(重性抑郁障碍、心境恶劣、广泛性焦虑障碍、社交恐惧症、惊恐障碍、广场恐怖症)。荷兰版 K10 的可靠性(Cronbach's alpha)为 0.94。基于受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,K10 对任何抑郁和/或焦虑障碍的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.87。EK10 上的扩展问题特别提高了焦虑障碍的检测能力。K10 的截断值为 20 时,对任何抑郁和/或焦虑障碍的敏感性为 0.80,特异性为 0.81。对于 EK10,截断值为 20 和/或附加问题上至少有一个阳性答案可提供对任何抑郁和/或焦虑障碍的检测敏感性为 0.90,特异性为 0.75。荷兰版 K10 适合在初级保健中筛查抑郁障碍,而 EK10 更适合筛查抑郁和焦虑障碍。

相似文献

1
The validity of the Dutch K10 and extended K10 screening scales for depressive and anxiety disorders.荷兰 K10 和扩展 K10 筛查量表评估抑郁和焦虑障碍的有效性。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Mar 30;176(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.01.012. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
2
Screening for depressive and anxiety disorders among adolescents in Indonesia: Formal validation of the centre for epidemiologic studies depression scale - revised and the Kessler psychological distress scale.印度尼西亚青少年抑郁和焦虑障碍的筛查:流行病学研究中心抑郁量表修订版和凯斯勒心理困扰量表的正式验证。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:189-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.042. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
Detecting depressive and anxiety disorders in distressed patients in primary care; comparative diagnostic accuracy of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).在初级保健中识别痛苦患者的抑郁和焦虑障碍;四维症状问卷(4DSQ)与医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)的比较诊断准确性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Aug 23;10:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-58.
4
Comparison of mental health screening tools for detecting antenatal depression and anxiety disorders in South African women.比较南非女性产前抑郁和焦虑障碍的心理健康筛查工具。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0193697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193697. eCollection 2018.
5
The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants.K10、K6 和 GHQ-12 量表筛查残疾索赔者中当前状态 DSM-IV 障碍的表现。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 12;13:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-128.
6
The psychometric properties of the K10 and K6 scales in screening for mood and anxiety disorders in the South African Stress and Health study.K10 和 K6 量表在南非压力与健康研究中筛查情绪和焦虑障碍的心理测量特性。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Dec;20(4):215-23. doi: 10.1002/mpr.351.
7
Brief self-rated screening for depression on the Internet.网上自评抑郁症状。
J Affect Disord. 2010 May;122(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.07.013. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
8
Screening for mood and anxiety disorders with the five-item, the three-item, and the two-item Mental Health Inventory.使用五项、三项和两项心理健康量表筛查情绪和焦虑障碍。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Aug 15;168(3):250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.012. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
9
Psychometric properties of an interviewer-administered version of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) among Dutch, Moroccan and Turkish respondents.荷兰、摩洛哥和土耳其受访者中由访谈者实施的凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K10)的心理测量特性。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009 Sep;18(3):159-68. doi: 10.1002/mpr.288.
10
Adaptation and validation of short scales for assessment of psychological distress in Iran: The Persian K10 and K6.适应和验证用于评估伊朗心理困扰的简短量表:波斯 K10 和 K6。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Sep;27(3):e1726. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1726. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining and Assessing Distress in Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.定义和评估肿瘤患者的痛苦:文献系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;13(16):1976. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161976.
2
Vegetable and Fruit Consumption and Psychological Distress: Findings from Australian National Health Survey Data, 2011-2018.蔬菜和水果的消费与心理困扰:来自2011 - 2018年澳大利亚国民健康调查数据的研究结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 28;22(7):1037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071037.
3
Transdiagnostic-focused apps for depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis.
针对抑郁和焦虑的跨诊断应用程序:一项荟萃分析。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 15;8(1):443. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01860-3.
4
Conditioned pain modulation elicited through manual pressure techniques on the cervical spine: a crossover study.通过对颈椎进行手动按压技术引发的条件性疼痛调制:一项交叉研究。
Pain Rep. 2025 Mar 18;10(2):e1258. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001258. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Association of Family-Centered Care With Psychological Distress Among Caregivers of Children With Cancer at a Tertiary-Level Hospital in Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study.家庭为中心的护理与埃塞俄比亚一家三级医院癌症患儿照顾者心理困扰的关联:横断面研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Oct 10;10:e54715. doi: 10.2196/54715.
6
ECO-MIND: enhancing pro-environmental behaviours and mental health through nature contact for urban youth - a research protocol for a multi-country study using geographic ecological momentary assessment and mental models.ECO-MIND:通过与自然接触增强城市青年的亲环境行为和心理健康 - 一项使用地理生态瞬间评估和心理模型的多国研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 8;14(10):e083578. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083578.
7
The Hidden Toll of Psychological Distress in Australian Adults and Its Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life Measured as Health State Utilities.澳大利亚成年人心理困扰的隐性代价及其对健康相关生活质量(以健康状态效用衡量)的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Jul;22(4):583-598. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00879-z. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
8
The Effects of a Digital, Transdiagnostic, Clinically and Peer-Moderated Treatment Platform for Young People With Emerging Mental Health Complaints: Repeated Measures Within-Subjects Study.数字化、跨诊断、临床和同行监督的治疗平台对有早期心理健康问题的年轻人的影响:基于重复测量的被试内研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Dec 13;11:e50636. doi: 10.2196/50636.
9
Effectiveness of a scalable, remotely delivered stepped-care intervention to reduce symptoms of psychological distress among Polish migrant workers in the Netherlands: study protocol for the RESPOND randomised controlled trial.一项可扩展的、远程提供的阶梯式护理干预措施,以减轻荷兰波兰移民工人心理困扰症状的有效性:RESPOND 随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 2;23(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05288-5.
10
Participation in the Global Corporate Challenge, a Four-Month Workplace Pedometer Program, Reduces Psychological Distress.参与全球企业挑战赛,一项为期四个月的职场计步器计划,可以减轻心理压力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;20(5):4514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054514.