Fassaert T, De Wit M A S, Tuinebreijer W C, Wouters H, Verhoeff A P, Beekman A T F, Dekker J
Department of Epidemiology, Documentation and Health Promotion, Municipal Health Service, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009 Sep;18(3):159-68. doi: 10.1002/mpr.288.
The Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) is an instrument that is widely used to screen for mental disorders, but information is lacking on its psychometric qualities in non-Western samples. This study used a population-based sample (N = 725) to assess the reliability and validity of the K10 across ethnic groups in an urban area. The results were generally supportive of the K10 as a reliable and valid instrument to screen for anxiety and depression in all three groups. Cronbach's alpha was high (0.93) and the results indicated the existence of a solid single factor structure. Item bias in relation to ethnic background was minor. In each group, there was good criterion validity with respect to one-month DSM-IV diagnosis for depressive and/or anxiety disorder. The results nevertheless highlight the importance of cross-cultural validation, as we found different cut-off values for ethnic subgroups to obtain optimal sensitivity and specificity for detecting depressive and/or anxiety disorders.
凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K10)是一种广泛用于筛查精神障碍的工具,但在非西方样本中的心理测量学特性方面缺乏相关信息。本研究采用基于人群的样本(N = 725)来评估K10在城市地区不同种族群体中的信度和效度。结果总体上支持K10作为一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于筛查所有三个群体中的焦虑和抑郁。克朗巴哈系数较高(0.93),结果表明存在稳固的单因素结构。与种族背景相关的项目偏差较小。在每个群体中,就抑郁和/或焦虑症的一个月DSM-IV诊断而言,都具有良好的效标效度。然而,结果突出了跨文化验证的重要性,因为我们发现不同种族亚组的临界值不同,以便在检测抑郁和/或焦虑症时获得最佳的敏感性和特异性。