Fleming Center for Healthcare Management, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Healthc Manag. 2009 Nov-Dec;54(6):369-81; discussion 381-2.
Most research in healthcare strategy has focused on formulating or implementing organizational plans and strategies, and little attention has been dedicated to the post-implementation control and evaluation of strategy, which we contend is the most critical aspect of achieving organizational goals. The objective of this study was to identify strategic control approaches used by major cancer centers in the country and to relate these practices to financial performance. Our intent was to expand the theory and practice of healthcare strategy to focused services, such as oncology. We designed a 17-question survey to capture elements of strategy and performance from our study sample, which comprised major cancer hospitals in the United States and shared similar mandates and resource constraints. The results suggest that high-performing cancer centers use more sophisticated analytical approaches, invest greater financial resources in performance analysis, and conduct more frequent performance reviews than do low-performing organizations. Our conclusions point to the need for a more robust approach to strategic assessment. In this article, we offer a number of recommendations for management to achieve strategic plans and goals on the basis of our research. To our knowledge, this study is one of the first to concentrate on the area of strategic control.
大多数医疗保健策略研究都集中在制定或实施组织计划和策略上,而很少关注战略的实施后控制和评估,我们认为这是实现组织目标的最关键方面。本研究的目的是确定该国主要癌症中心使用的战略控制方法,并将这些做法与财务绩效联系起来。我们的目的是将医疗保健战略的理论和实践扩展到专注于服务的领域,如肿瘤学。我们设计了一个 17 个问题的调查,从我们的研究样本中捕获战略和绩效要素,该样本包括美国的主要癌症医院,它们具有相似的任务和资源限制。结果表明,表现出色的癌症中心比表现不佳的组织使用更复杂的分析方法,在绩效分析上投入更多的财务资源,并进行更频繁的绩效审查。我们的结论指出,需要采取更有力的战略评估方法。在本文中,我们根据我们的研究为管理层提供了实现战略计划和目标的若干建议。据我们所知,这项研究是首批专注于战略控制领域的研究之一。