Suppr超能文献

南非开普敦一家学术医院的死因证明质量。

Quality of cause of death certification at an academic hospital in Cape Town, South Africa.

机构信息

Burden of Disease Research Unit, Medical Research Council Tygerberg, W Cape.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 2009 Sep;99(9):648-52.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the quality of cause of death certification and assess the level of under-reporting of HIV/AIDS as a cause of death at an academic hospital.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional descriptive retrospective review of death notification forms (DNFs) of deaths due to natural causes in an academic hospital in Cape Town during 2004. Errors in cause of death certification and ability to code causes of death according to the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) were assessed. The association between serious errors and age, gender, cause of death and hospital ward was analysed. A sample of DNFs (N=243) was assessed for level of under-reporting of HIV/AIDS.

RESULTS

A total of 983 death certificates were evaluated. Almost every DNF had a minor error; serious errors were found in 32.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 29.3-35.1%). Errors increased with patient age, and cause of death was the most important factor associated with serious errors. Compared with neoplasms, which had the lowest error rate, the odds ratios for errors in endocrine and metabolic diseases and genito-urinary diseases were 17.2 (95% CI 8.7-34.0) and 17.3 (95% CI 7.8-38.2), respectively. Based on the sub-sample, the minimum prevalence of HIV among the deceased patients was 15.7% (95% CI 11.1-20.3%) and the under-reporting of deaths due to AIDS was 53.1% (95% CI 35.8-70.4%).

CONCLUSION

Errors were sufficiently serious to affect identification of underlying cause of death in almost a third of the DNFs, confirming the need to improve the quality of medical certification.

摘要

目的

调查死亡证明的质量,并评估在开普敦一所学术医院将艾滋病(HIV/AIDS)作为死因漏报的程度。

设计

对 2004 年在开普敦一所学术医院因自然原因死亡的死亡通知表(DNF)进行了回顾性的横断面描述性研究。评估了死因认证中的错误以及根据《国际疾病分类和相关健康问题第十次修订本》(ICD-10)对死因进行编码的能力。分析了严重错误与年龄、性别、死因和医院病房之间的关系。对 DNF 进行了 HIV/AIDS 漏报程度的样本评估。

结果

共评估了 983 份死亡证明。几乎每份 DNF 都有一个小错误;严重错误占 32.2%(95%置信区间(CI)29.3-35.1%)。错误随着患者年龄的增加而增加,死因是与严重错误最相关的因素。与肿瘤(错误率最低)相比,内分泌和代谢疾病以及泌尿生殖系统疾病的错误率的比值比分别为 17.2(95%CI 8.7-34.0)和 17.3(95%CI 7.8-38.2)。基于子样本,死亡患者中艾滋病的最低流行率为 15.7%(95%CI 11.1-20.3%),艾滋病死亡漏报率为 53.1%(95%CI 35.8-70.4%)。

结论

错误严重到足以影响近三分之一 DNF 中潜在死因的识别,这证实了需要提高医疗认证的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验