Suppr超能文献

南非开普敦的死亡原因统计数据验证研究发现,其吻合度较差。

Validation study of cause of death statistics in Cape Town, South Africa, found poor agreement.

机构信息

Division of Forensic Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The validity of the underlying cause of death on death notification forms was assessed by comparing it to the underlying cause determined independently from medical records.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective study of 703 deaths in two suburbs of Cape Town, South Africa. Two medical doctors completed a medical review death certificate to validate the registration death certificate for each decedent. Agreement, sensitivity, and positive predictive value were measured for underlying causes of death using the World Health Organization (WHO) mortality tabulation list 1.

RESULTS

Agreement was poor, with only 55.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51.7, 59.0) of diagnoses matching at WHO mortality tabulation list 1 level. Validity of reported causes of death was poor for HIV, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes. With correct reporting, the cause-specific mortality fraction for HIV increased from 11.9% to 18.3% (53.6%; 95% CI: 36.9, 77.6), for ischemic heart disease from 3.3% to 7.3% (121.7%; 95% CI: 53.5, 228.7), and for hypertensive diseases from 3.3% to 5.7% (73.9%; 95% CI: 14.4, 167.8). For diabetes, the mortality fraction decreased from 6.0% to 2.3% (-64.3%; 95% CI: -77.1, -37.8) and for ill-defined deaths from 7.4% to 2.3% (-69.2%; 95% CI: -81.0, -51.6).

CONCLUSION

Current cause-specific mortality levels should be cautiously interpreted. Death certification training is required to improve the validity of mortality data.

摘要

目的

通过将死亡通知表上的根本死因与从病历中独立确定的根本死因进行比较,评估死亡通知表上根本死因的有效性。

研究设计和地点

这项在南非开普敦两个郊区进行的回顾性研究共涉及 703 例死亡。两名医生完成了一份医疗审查死亡证明,以验证每位死者的登记死亡证明。使用世界卫生组织(WHO)死亡列表 1 来衡量死因的一致性、敏感性和阳性预测值。

结果

诊断结果在 WHO 死亡列表 1 水平上的匹配率仅为 55.3%(95%置信区间[CI]:51.7,59.0),一致性较差。报告的 HIV、心血管疾病和糖尿病死因的准确性较差。如果正确报告,HIV 的特定病因死亡率从 11.9%增加到 18.3%(53.6%;95%CI:36.9,77.6),缺血性心脏病从 3.3%增加到 7.3%(121.7%;95%CI:53.5,228.7),高血压疾病从 3.3%增加到 5.7%(73.9%;95%CI:14.4,167.8)。对于糖尿病,死亡率从 6.0%下降到 2.3%(-64.3%;95%CI:-77.1,-37.8),不明原因死亡率从 7.4%下降到 2.3%(-69.2%;95%CI:-81.0,-51.6)。

结论

目前的特定病因死亡率水平应谨慎解读。需要进行死亡证明培训,以提高死亡率数据的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验