Trauma Service, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Flemington Rd, Parkville 3052, Australia.
Injury. 2010 Sep;41(9):948-54. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
The 2005 version of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS05) potentially represents a significant change in injury spectrum classification, due to a substantial increase in the codeset size and alterations to the agreed severity of many injuries compared to the previous version (AIS98). Whilst many trauma registries around the world are moving to adopt AIS05 or its 2008 update (AIS08), its effect on patient classification in existing registries, and the optimum method of comparing existing data collections with new AIS05 collections are unknown. The present study aimed to assess the potential impact of adopting the AIS05 codeset in an established trauma system, and to identify issues associated with this change.
A current subset of consecutive major trauma patients admitted to two large hospitals in the Australian state of Victoria were double-coded in AIS98 and AIS05. Assigned codesets were also mapped to the other AIS version using code lists supplied in the AIS05 manual, giving up to four AIS codes per injury sustained. Resulting codesets were assessed for agreement in codes used, injury severity and calculated severity scores.
602 injuries sustained by 109 patients were compared. Adopting AIS05 would lead to a decrease in the number of designated major trauma patients in Victoria, estimated at 22% (95% confidence interval, 15-31%). Differences in AIS level between versions were significantly more likely to occur amongst head and chest injuries. Data mapped to a different codeset performed better in paired comparisons than raw AIS98 and AIS05 codesets, with data mapping of AIS05 codes back to AIS98 giving significantly higher levels of agreement in AIS level, ISS and NISS than other potential comparisons, and resulting in significantly fewer conversion problems than attempting to map AIS98 codes to AIS05.
This study provides new insights into AIS codeset change impact. Adoption of AIS05 or AIS08 in established registries will decrease major trauma patient numbers. Code mapping between AIS versions can improve comparisons between datasets in different AIS versions, although the injury profile of a trauma population will affect the degree of comparability. At present, mapping AIS05 data back to AIS98 is recommended.
与之前的版本(AIS98)相比,2005 年版简明损伤定级(AIS05)的损伤谱分类可能发生重大变化,因为代码集的大小大幅增加,许多损伤的商定严重程度也发生了变化。尽管世界各地的许多创伤登记处都在转向采用 AIS05 或其 2008 年更新版(AIS08),但它对现有登记处中患者分类的影响,以及将现有数据与新 AIS05 数据进行比较的最佳方法尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估在既定创伤系统中采用 AIS05 代码集的潜在影响,并确定与这一变化相关的问题。
对澳大利亚维多利亚州两家大医院连续收治的一组当前严重创伤患者进行了 AIS98 和 AIS05 双重编码。还使用 AIS05 手册中提供的代码列表将分配的代码集映射到另一个 AIS 版本,每个损伤最多可分配四个 AIS 代码。然后评估每个损伤的代码使用、损伤严重程度和计算严重程度评分的一致性。
比较了 109 名患者的 602 处损伤。维多利亚州采用 AIS05 将导致指定的严重创伤患者数量减少 22%(95%置信区间,15-31%)。两个版本之间 AIS 级别的差异更可能发生在头部和胸部损伤中。与原始 AIS98 和 AIS05 代码集相比,映射到不同代码集的数据在配对比较中表现更好,将 AIS05 代码映射回 AIS98 比其他潜在比较产生更高的 AIS 级别、ISS 和 NISS 一致性水平,并且比尝试将 AIS98 代码映射到 AIS05 产生的转换问题更少。
本研究提供了 AIS 代码集变更影响的新见解。在既定登记处采用 AIS05 或 AIS08 将减少严重创伤患者数量。AIS 版本之间的代码映射可以改善不同 AIS 版本之间数据集的比较,尽管创伤人群的损伤情况会影响可比性的程度。目前,建议将 AIS05 数据映射回 AIS98。