• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

声学嗓音质量指数:用于改善嗓音障碍的治疗效果评估

The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders.

作者信息

Maryn Youri, De Bodt Marc, Roy Nelson

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Sint-Jan General Hospital, Ruddershove 10, Bruges, Belgium.

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):161-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004
PMID:20080243
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Voice practitioners require an objective index of dysphonia severity as a means to reliably track treatment outcomes. To ensure ecological validity however, such a measure should survey both sustained vowels and continuous speech. In an earlier study, a multivariate acoustic model referred to as the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), consisting of a weighted combination of 6 time-, frequency- and quefrency-domain metrics, was developed to measure dysphonia severity in both speaking tasks. In the current investigation, the generalizability and clinical utility of the AVQI are evaluated by first assessing its external cross-validity and then determining its sensitivity to change in dysphonia severity following surgical and/or behavioral voice treatment. The results, based upon a new set of normal and disordered voices compared favorably with outcomes reported earlier, indicating acceptable external validity. Furthermore, the AVQI was sensitive to treatment-related changes, validating its role as a potentially robust and objective voice treatment outcomes measure.

LEARNING OUTCOMES

Readers will be able to: (1) explain methodological issues surrounding the development of voice treatment outcomes measures (such as external cross-validity and responsiveness to change), (2) appreciate the relevance of measuring dysphonia severity in both sustained vowels and connected speech, (3) describe the method of obtaining the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), (4) appreciate differences among a variety of estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and (5) discuss the AVQI as a clinically valid treatment outcomes measure.

摘要

未标注

嗓音治疗从业者需要一种客观的嗓音障碍严重程度指标,作为可靠跟踪治疗效果的手段。然而,为确保生态效度,这样一种测量方法应同时考察持续元音和连续语音。在一项早期研究中,开发了一种多变量声学模型,称为声学嗓音质量指数(AVQI),它由6个时域、频域和倒频域指标的加权组合构成,用于测量两种言语任务中的嗓音障碍严重程度。在当前的研究中,通过首先评估AVQI的外部交叉效度,然后确定其对手术和/或行为嗓音治疗后嗓音障碍严重程度变化的敏感性,来评估AVQI的可推广性和临床实用性。基于一组新的正常和异常嗓音得出的结果与早期报告的结果相比更有利,表明具有可接受的外部效度。此外,AVQI对与治疗相关的变化敏感,证实了其作为一种潜在强大且客观的嗓音治疗效果测量方法的作用。

学习成果

读者将能够:(1)解释围绕嗓音治疗效果测量方法发展的方法学问题(如外部交叉效度和对变化的反应性),(2)认识到在持续元音和连贯语音中测量嗓音障碍严重程度的相关性,(3)描述获得声学嗓音质量指数(AVQI)的方法,(4)认识到各种诊断准确性估计之间的差异,以及(5)将AVQI作为一种临床有效的治疗效果测量方法进行讨论。

相似文献

1
The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders.声学嗓音质量指数:用于改善嗓音障碍的治疗效果评估
J Commun Disord. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):161-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
2
Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.运用声学嗓音质量指数对儿童嗓音障碍进行客观评估。
J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):672.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 May 25.
3
Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.提高整体语音质量声学测量的生态有效性:结合连续语音和持续元音。
J Voice. 2010 Sep;24(5):540-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.014. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
4
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
5
External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity.具有扩展代表性的声学嗓音质量指数03.01版的外部验证
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Jul;125(7):571-83. doi: 10.1177/0003489416636131. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
6
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.验证法语版声学语音质量指数 03.01。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e11-646.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
7
Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia.两种嗓音障碍严重程度多参数声学指标的比较:嗓音声学质量指数和嗓音障碍的谐波倒谱谱指数
J Voice. 2018 Jul;32(4):515.e1-515.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.测量韩语语音发声障碍严重程度的听觉感知和声学方法
J Voice. 2016 Sep;30(5):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
9
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.嗓音障碍严重程度指数与声学嗓音质量指数在区分正常嗓音和嗓音障碍嗓音方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
10
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.日语中声学嗓音质量指数的验证
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):260.e1-260.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Agreement in Voice Acoustic Parameters: A Repeated Measures Case Study Across Varied Recording Instruments, Speech Samples, and Daily Timeframes.探索语音声学参数的一致性:一项针对不同录音设备、语音样本和每日时间范围的重复测量案例研究。
Acoustics (Basel). 2025 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.3390/acoustics7010006. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Voice fatigue subtyping through individual modeling of vocal demand reponses.通过对嗓音需求反应进行个体建模来实现嗓音疲劳亚型分类。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 16;15(1):25718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10565-2.
3
Tracheoesophageal Voicing Following Resistance-Based Dysphagia Rehabilitation: An Exploratory Multidimensional Assessment.
基于阻力的吞咽障碍康复后的气管食管发音:一项探索性多维评估
Head Neck. 2025 Aug;47(8):2209-2222. doi: 10.1002/hed.28136. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
4
Screening Voice Disorders: Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Cepstral Peak Prominence, and Machine Learning.嗓音障碍筛查:声学嗓音质量指数、谐波峰值突出度与机器学习
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2025 Feb 21:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000544852.
5
The Rapidly Evolving Scenario of Acoustic Voice Analysis in Otolaryngology.耳鼻咽喉科中快速发展的嗓音声学分析情况
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73491. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73491. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Characterization of upper esophageal sphincter pressures relative to vocal acoustics.相对于嗓音声学的食管上括约肌压力特征
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2025 Jan 1;138(1):203-212. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00385.2024. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
7
Comparative Study of Two Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract Protocols: A Randomized Clinical Trial.两种半封闭声道方案的对比研究:一项随机临床试验。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Nov 7;67(11):4275-4287. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-22-00456. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
8
Effectiveness of remotely delivered speech therapy in persons with Parkinson's disease - a randomised controlled trial.远程提供言语治疗对帕金森病患者的有效性——一项随机对照试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 11;76:102823. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102823. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Impact of cochlear implants use on voice production and quality.人工耳蜗植入对发声和音质的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 4;14(1):12787. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63688-3.
10
Accuracy Analysis of the Multiparametric Acoustic Voice Indices, the VWI, AVQI, ABI, and DSI Measures, in Differentiating between Normal and Dysphonic Voices.多参数声学嗓音指标(VWI、AVQI、ABI和DSI测量值)在区分正常嗓音和发声障碍嗓音方面的准确性分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 23;13(1):99. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010099.