• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value.美国保护区及其附近的住房增长限制了其保护价值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 12;107(2):940-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911131107. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
2
Subdivision design and stewardship affect bird and mammal use of conservation developments.细分设计和管理影响保护发展中鸟类和哺乳动物的利用。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Jun;27(4):1236-1252. doi: 10.1002/eap.1517. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Landscape development, forest fires, and wilderness management.景观开发、森林火灾与荒野管理。
Science. 1974 Nov 8;186(4163):487-95. doi: 10.1126/science.186.4163.487.
4
Housing development erodes avian community structure in U.S. protected areas.住房开发破坏了美国保护区内的鸟类群落结构。
Ecol Appl. 2014;24(6):1445-62. doi: 10.1890/12-1992.1.
5
Residential development encroachment on U.S. protected areas.住宅开发侵占美国保护区。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Feb;24(1):151-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01296.x. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
6
Identifying ecosystem service value and potential loss of wilderness areas in China to support post-2020 global biodiversity conservation.识别中国荒野地区的生态系统服务价值和潜在损失,以支持 2020 年后全球生物多样性保护。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 10;846:157348. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157348. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
7
Land development in and around protected areas at the wilderness frontier.自然荒野保护区内外的土地开发。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Feb;27(1):166-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01953.x. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
8
Effectiveness of protected areas in reducing deforestation and forest fragmentation in Bangladesh.保护区在减少孟加拉国森林砍伐和森林破碎化方面的有效性。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111711. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111711. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
9
Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century.二十一世纪的基于区域的保护。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7828):217-227. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
10
Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes.全球森林的丧失不成比例地破坏了完整景观中的生物多样性。
Nature. 2017 Jul 27;547(7664):441-444. doi: 10.1038/nature23285. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.利用空间捕获-再捕获模型评估冰川国家公园黑熊(美洲黑熊)的密度加权连通性。
Mov Ecol. 2024 Jan 23;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40462-023-00445-7.
2
Conservation spillover effect of UNESCO World Heritage Sites into surrounding landscapes.世界遗产地对周边景观的保护溢出效应。
PeerJ. 2023 Oct 10;11:e15858. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15858. eCollection 2023.
3
Rural Light Pollution from Shale Gas Development and Associated Sleep and Subjective Well-Being.页岩气开发带来的乡村光污染及其对睡眠和主观幸福感的影响
Resour Energy Econ. 2021 May;64. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101220. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Enhanced regional connectivity between western North American national parks will increase persistence of mammal species diversity.加强北美西部国家公园间的区域连通性将提高哺乳动物物种多样性的持续性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 11;13(1):474. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26428-z.
5
Improving intelligent dasymetric mapping population density estimates at 30 m resolution for the conterminous United States by excluding uninhabited areas.通过排除无人居住区域,提高美国本土30米分辨率的智能面积加权人口密度估计值。
Earth Syst Sci Data. 2022 Jun 23;14(6):2833-2849. doi: 10.5194/essd-14-2833-2022.
6
Suitable Habitats of spp. Need Urgent Protection from Habitat Fragmentation in China: Especially Suitable Habitats in Non-Nature Reserve Areas.中国[物种名称]的适宜栖息地急需保护以防止栖息地破碎化:特别是非自然保护区内的适宜栖息地。 (注:原文中“spp.”一般指“species”复数形式,这里因未明确具体物种,保留英文缩写,翻译时需根据上下文准确替换为具体物种名称)
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 11;12(16):2047. doi: 10.3390/ani12162047.
7
Effectiveness of China's Protected Areas in Mitigating Human Activity Pressure.中国保护区在缓解人类活动压力方面的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159335.
8
Housing starts and the associated wood products carbon storage by county by Shared Socioeconomic Pathway in the United States.美国各县按共同社会经济途径划分的住房开工和相关木制品碳储存。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 11;17(8):e0270025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270025. eCollection 2022.
9
Wilderness areas in a changing landscape: changes in land use, land cover, and climate.变化中的景观中的荒野地区:土地利用、土地覆盖和气候的变化。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jan;32(1):e02471. doi: 10.1002/eap.2471. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
10
Turning to the dark side: LED light at night alters the activity and species composition of a foraging bat assemblage in the northeastern United States.转向黑暗面:夜间的LED灯光改变了美国东北部觅食蝙蝠群落的活动和物种组成。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 27;11(10):5635-5645. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7466. eCollection 2021 May.

本文引用的文献

1
The wildland-urban interface in the United States based on 125 million building locations.美国基于 1.25 亿个建筑物位置的城乡交错带。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jul;32(5):e2597. doi: 10.1002/eap.2597. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
2
On the protection of "protected areas".论“保护区”的保护
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 6;105(18):6673-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802471105. Epub 2008 May 1.
3
Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage.储备有效性的估计因泄漏而混淆。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Mar;23(3):113-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
4
Patterns of houses and habitat loss from 1937 to 1999 in northern Wisconsin, USA.1937年至1999年美国威斯康星州北部房屋和栖息地丧失模式。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Oct;17(7):2011-23. doi: 10.1890/06-1963.1.
5
Associations of forest bird species richness with housing and landscape patterns across the USA.美国森林鸟类物种丰富度与住房和景观格局的关联。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Oct;17(7):1989-2010. doi: 10.1890/06-1489.1.
6
Human influence on California fire regimes.人类对加利福尼亚火灾状况的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Jul;17(5):1388-402. doi: 10.1890/06-1128.1.
7
Temporal changes in giant panda habitat connectivity across boundaries of Wolong Nature Reserve, China.中国卧龙自然保护区边界大熊猫栖息地连通性的时间变化。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Jun;17(4):1019-30. doi: 10.1890/05-1288.
8
Conservation easements: biodiversity protection and private use.保护地役权:生物多样性保护与私人利用。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):709-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00660.x.
9
Global consequences of land use.土地利用的全球影响。
Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772.
10
Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo.印度尼西亚婆罗洲保护区内的低地森林流失
Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1000-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1091714.

美国保护区及其附近的住房增长限制了其保护价值。

Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value.

机构信息

Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 12;107(2):940-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911131107. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0911131107
PMID:20080780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2818924/
Abstract

Protected areas are crucial for biodiversity conservation because they provide safe havens for species threatened by land-use change and resulting habitat loss. However, protected areas are only effective when they stop habitat loss within their boundaries, and are connected via corridors to other wild areas. The effectiveness of protected areas is threatened by development; however, the extent of this threat is unknown. We compiled spatially-detailed housing growth data from 1940 to 2030, and quantified growth for each wilderness area, national park, and national forest in the conterminous United States. Our findings show that housing development in the United States may severely limit the ability of protected areas to function as a modern "Noah's Ark." Between 1940 and 2000, 28 million housing units were built within 50 km of protected areas, and 940,000 were built within national forests. Housing growth rates during the 1990s within 1 km of protected areas (20% per decade) outpaced the national average (13%). If long-term trends continue, another 17 million housing units will be built within 50 km of protected areas by 2030 (1 million within 1 km), greatly diminishing their conservation value. US protected areas are increasingly isolated, housing development in their surroundings is decreasing their effective size, and national forests are even threatened by habitat loss within their administrative boundaries. Protected areas in the United States are thus threatened similarly to those in developing countries. However, housing growth poses the main threat to protected areas in the United States whereas deforestation is the main threat in developing countries.

摘要

保护区对于生物多样性的保护至关重要,因为它们为那些受到土地利用变化和由此导致的栖息地丧失威胁的物种提供了安全的避难所。然而,只有当保护区能够阻止其边界内的栖息地丧失,并通过走廊与其他野生区域相连时,它们才是有效的。保护区的有效性受到发展的威胁;然而,这种威胁的程度尚不清楚。我们从 1940 年到 2030 年汇编了详细的住房增长数据,并量化了美国大陆上每个荒野地区、国家公园和国家森林的增长情况。我们的研究结果表明,美国的住房开发可能会严重限制保护区作为现代“诺亚方舟”的功能。在 1940 年至 2000 年期间,在美国保护区 50 公里范围内建造了 2800 万套住房,在国家森林内建造了 94 万套住房。在保护区一公里范围内,20 世纪 90 年代的住房增长率(每十年 20%)超过了全国平均水平(13%)。如果长期趋势持续下去,到 2030 年,在美国保护区 50 公里范围内还将再建造 1700 万套住房(100 万套在 1 公里范围内),这将大大降低它们的保护价值。美国的保护区越来越孤立,周围的住房开发正在缩小它们的有效面积,国家森林甚至受到其行政边界内的栖息地丧失的威胁。因此,美国的保护区面临着与发展中国家类似的威胁。然而,在美国,住房增长对保护区构成了主要威胁,而在发展中国家,森林砍伐是主要威胁。