Kristensen Solvejg, Henriksen Tine Brink, Bilenberg Niels
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Research unit, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2010 May 4;64(3):203-9. doi: 10.3109/08039480903456595.
Psychometric instruments are used increasingly within research and clinical settings, and therefore standardization has become an important prerequisite, even for investigating very young children. Currently, there are no standardized psychometric instruments available for assessment of preschool children in Denmark.
The aim was to achieve Danish national norm scores for the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1(1/2)-5 (CBCL/1(1/2)-5) and the Caregiver Report Form (C-TRF).
The study was based on an age- and gender-stratified cohort sample of 1750 children aged 1(1/2)-5 years born at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The CBCL/1(1/2)-5 and C-TRF were mailed to parents, who were asked to pass on the C-TRF to the preschool caregiver. The national standard register data gave access to information on socio-economic status, family type, ethnicity and parental educational level for analysis of participation and representation.
A total number of 850 (49%) families replied, and 624 caregivers replied. The mean Total Problem Score (TPS) with 95% confidence interval was 17.3 (16.3-18.3) for parents' reports. Age-and gender-specific scale score findings for Danish preschoolers and schoolchildren were comparable. No differences were found in the mean TPS within subgroups related to parental socio-demographic features.
On the basis of a large sample, Danish national norm scores and profiles of the ASEBA Preschool Forms were established; the scores of descendents must, however, be assessed with some caution. With this reservation, the CBCL/1(1/2)-5 and C-TRF forms are now available in Danish and can be recommended for use in clinical and research settings.
心理测量工具在研究和临床环境中使用得越来越频繁,因此标准化已成为一项重要前提,即便对于研究幼儿也是如此。目前,丹麦没有可用于评估学龄前儿童的标准化心理测量工具。
旨在获得丹麦全国1.5至5岁儿童行为清单(CBCL/1.5 - 5)和照顾者报告表(C - TRF)的常模分数。
该研究基于丹麦奥胡斯大学医院出生的1750名1.5至5岁儿童的年龄和性别分层队列样本。CBCL/1.5 - 5和C - TRF被邮寄给家长,并要求家长将C - TRF转交给学龄前儿童的照顾者。通过国家标准登记数据可获取社会经济地位、家庭类型、种族和父母教育水平等信息,以分析参与情况和代表性。
共有850个(49%)家庭回复,624名照顾者回复。家长报告的平均总问题得分(TPS)及95%置信区间为17.3(16.3 - 18.3)。丹麦学龄前儿童和学童的年龄及性别特异性量表得分结果具有可比性。在与父母社会人口学特征相关的亚组中,平均TPS未发现差异。
基于大量样本,建立了丹麦全国ASEBA学龄前儿童量表的常模分数和概况;然而,对后代的分数评估必须谨慎。有了这一保留意见后,CBCL/1.5 - 5和C - TRF表格现在有丹麦语版本,可推荐用于临床和研究环境。