Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍中创造性的情感和认知因素的相互作用:一项对照研究。

Toward interaction of affective and cognitive contributors to creativity in bipolar disorders: a controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5723, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2010 Sep;125(1-3):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.12.018. Epub 2010 Jan 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced creativity in bipolar disorder patients may be related to affective and cognitive phenomena.

METHODS

32 bipolar disorder patients (BP), 21 unipolar major depressive disorder patients (MDD), 22 creative controls (CC), and 42 healthy controls (HC) (all euthymic) completed the Revised Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Personality Inventory (NEO), the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A), the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI); the Barron-Welsh Art Scale (BWAS), the Adjective Check List Creative Personality Scale, and the Figural and Verbal Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Mean scores were compared across groups, and relationships between temperament/personality and creativity were assessed with bivariate correlation and hierarchical multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

BP and CC (but not MDD) compared to HC had higher BWAS-Total (46% and 42% higher, respectively, p<0.05) and BWAS-Dislike (83% and 93% higher, p<0.02) scores, and higher MBTI-Intuition preference type rates (78% vs. 50% and 96% vs. 50%, p<0.05). BP, MDD, and CC, compared to HC, had increased TEMPS-A-Cyclothymia scores (666%, 451% and 434% higher, respectively, p<0.0001), and NEO-Neuroticism scores (60%, 57% and 51% higher, p<0.0001). NEO-Neuroticism and TEMPS-A Cyclothymia correlated with BWAS-Dislike (and BWAS-Total), while MBTI-Intuition continuous scores and NEO-Openness correlated with BWAS-Like (and BWAS-Total).

LIMITATIONS

Relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

We replicate the role of cyclothymic and related temperaments in creativity, as well as that of intuitive processes. Further studies are needed to clarify relationships between creativity and affective and cognitive processes in bipolar disorder patients.

摘要

背景

双相障碍患者的创造力增强可能与情感和认知现象有关。

方法

32 名双相障碍患者(BP)、21 名单相重性抑郁障碍患者(MDD)、22 名创意对照组(CC)和 42 名健康对照组(HC)(均情绪稳定)完成了修订神经症外向开放人格量表(NEO)、孟菲斯、比萨、巴黎和圣地亚哥自动问卷的气质评估(TEMPS-A)、迈尔斯-布里格斯类型量表(MBTI);巴伦-威尔士艺术量表(BWAS)、形容词检查表创意人格量表和图形和言语托兰斯创造性思维测验。比较各组的平均得分,并通过双变量相关和分层多元线性回归评估气质/人格与创造力之间的关系。

结果

BP 和 CC(而非 MDD)与 HC 相比,BWAS-总分(分别高出 46%和 42%,p<0.05)和 BWAS-不喜欢(分别高出 83%和 93%,p<0.02)得分更高,MBTI-直觉偏好类型率更高(78%对 50%和 96%对 50%,p<0.05)。与 HC 相比,BP、MDD 和 CC 的 TEMPS-A-环性情绪评分更高(分别高出 666%、451%和 434%,p<0.0001),NEO-神经质评分更高(分别高出 60%、57%和 51%,p<0.0001)。NEO-神经质和 TEMPS-A-环性情绪与 BWAS-不喜欢(和 BWAS-总分)相关,而 MBTI-直觉连续评分和 NEO-开放性与 BWAS-喜欢(和 BWAS-总分)相关。

局限性

样本量相对较小。

结论

我们复制了环性和相关气质在创造力中的作用,以及直觉过程的作用。需要进一步的研究来阐明双相障碍患者的创造力与情感和认知过程之间的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验