Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Stat Med. 2010 Feb 28;29(5):588-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.3831.
Age-specific disease incidence rates are typically estimated from longitudinal data, where disease-free subjects are followed over time and incident cases are observed. However, longitudinal studies have substantial cost and time requirements, not to mention other challenges such as loss to follow up. Alternatively, cross-sectional data can be used to estimate age-specific incidence rates in a more timely and cost-effective manner. Such studies rely on self-report of onset age. Self-reported onset age is subject to measurement error and bias. In this paper, we use a Bayesian bivariate smoothing approach to estimate age-specific incidence rates from cross-sectional survey data. Rates are modeled as a smooth function of age and lag (difference between age and onset age), with larger values of lag effectively down weighted, as they are assumed to be less reliable. We conduct an extensive simulation study to investigate the extent to which measurement error and bias in the reported onset age affects inference using the proposed methods. We use data from a national headache survey to estimate age- and gender-specific migraine incidence rates.
特定年龄的疾病发病率通常是根据纵向数据来估计的,在纵向数据中,无疾病的受试者随着时间的推移被跟踪,并且观察到新发病例。然而,纵向研究需要大量的成本和时间,更不用说其他挑战,如随访丢失。或者,可以使用横断面数据以更及时和具有成本效益的方式估计特定年龄的发病率。此类研究依赖于发病年龄的自我报告。自我报告的发病年龄存在测量误差和偏差。在本文中,我们使用贝叶斯双变量平滑方法,根据横断面调查数据估计特定年龄的发病率。将发病率建模为年龄和滞后(年龄与发病年龄之间的差异)的平滑函数,较大的滞后值实际上被加权较小,因为它们被认为不太可靠。我们进行了广泛的模拟研究,以调查报告的发病年龄中的测量误差和偏差在多大程度上影响了使用所提出的方法进行的推断。我们使用一项全国性头痛调查的数据来估计年龄和性别特异性偏头痛发病率。