School of Graduate Studies, Program in Neural and Behavioral Science, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Hippocampus. 2011 May;21(5):481-94. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20764.
To ask if the properties of spatial learning supported by the hippocampus are distinct from the properties of conditioning, we conducted a blocking-like experiment in which the measured variable was not a conditioned response but rather the ability of a novel visual stimulus to control the location of place cell firing fields after being briefly combined with a familiar, salient stimulus to form a compound stimulus. For most rats, we found that rotations of the novel stimulus on the wall of a cylindrical recording chamber produced equal rotations of firing fields, whether exposure to the compound stimulus lasted 10 min or 60 min. Thus, there was little indication that the blocking phenomenon (Kamin, 1969) acted to prevent the rapid inclusion of a new stimulus into a previously experienced cue constellation. This result is in agreement with the finding of Doeller and Burgess (2008) that blocking is seen for landmark stimuli inside an arena but not for boundary stimuli that circumscribe the arena. We conclude that the rules governing incidental spatial learning are different for the hippocampal representation of a rat's environment than for conditioning.
为了探究海马体支持的空间学习特性是否与条件作用的特性不同,我们进行了一项类似于阻滞的实验,在该实验中,测量的变量不是条件反应,而是在短暂地与熟悉的显著刺激结合形成复合刺激后,新的视觉刺激控制位置细胞放电场位置的能力。对于大多数大鼠,我们发现,当在圆柱形记录室的墙上旋转新的刺激时,无论暴露于复合刺激的时间为 10 分钟还是 60 分钟,放电场都会产生相等的旋转。因此,几乎没有迹象表明阻滞现象(Kamin,1969)会阻止新刺激快速纳入以前经历过的线索组合中。这一结果与 Doeller 和 Burgess(2008)的发现一致,即对于竞技场内部的地标刺激可以看到阻滞现象,但对于包围竞技场的边界刺激则不会。我们的结论是,支配偶然空间学习的规则对于大鼠环境的海马体表现与条件作用不同。