Suppr超能文献

[实践中的补充和替代医学——全科医生视角下的诊断-治疗过程:一项定性研究]

[Complementary and alternative medicine in practice - the diagnostic-therapeutic process from the perspective of general practitioners: a qualitative study].

作者信息

Musselmann Berthold, Szecsenyi Joachim, Joos Stefanie

机构信息

Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Forsch Komplementmed. 2009 Dec;16(6):392-9. doi: 10.1159/000258673. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widely used in general practices in Germany. This study aimed to explore the diagnostic-therapeutic process and relevant factors regarding the use of CAM from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs).

METHODS

Within a qualitative approach 3 focus groups with a convenience sample of 17 GPs were conducted. Group discussions were analysed by qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

GPs view the diagnostic-therapeutic process in CAM as complex and less dependent on the methods used than on approach-independent factors. On the basis of the focus group transcripts, 4 main categories were identified that play a major role when CAM is used in primary care: patient factors, physician factors, relationship factors and generic factors of CAM. 'Constitution', 'expectation', and 'personal (life) concepts' were mentioned as relevant patient factors, 'empathy', 'respect' and 'authenticity' as relevant physician factors. At the level of the doctor-patient-relationship, 'time', 'confidence', 'matching', 'balance of power' and 'rituals' seem to play a major role.

DISCUSSION

From the perspective of the GPs the diagnostic-therapeutic process can be considered as a cyclic process in which patient, physician and relationship elements as well as generic CAM factors are closely interweaved. According to this conception, CAM can be used for a wide range of health problems in primary care. Sufficient time and a trustful doctor-patient-relationship are, however, essential for the use of CAM. Due to the increasing economical pressure there is a risk that CAM is processualised, i.e. split into single processes and uncoupled from the doctor-patient-relationship. This would jeopardise efficacy of CAM in everyday practice.

摘要

背景

补充和替代医学(CAM)在德国的普通医疗实践中广泛应用。本研究旨在从全科医生(GP)的角度探讨使用CAM的诊断治疗过程及相关因素。

方法

采用定性研究方法,对17名全科医生的便利样本进行了3次焦点小组访谈。通过定性内容分析法对小组讨论进行分析。

结果

全科医生认为CAM的诊断治疗过程复杂,与其所使用的方法相比,更依赖于与方法无关的因素。根据焦点小组访谈记录,确定了在初级保健中使用CAM时起主要作用的4个主要类别:患者因素、医生因素、关系因素和CAM的一般因素。“体质”“期望”和“个人(生活)观念”被提及为相关患者因素,“同理心”“尊重”和“真实性”为相关医生因素。在医患关系层面,“时间”“信任”“匹配度”“权力平衡”和“仪式”似乎起主要作用。

讨论

从全科医生的角度来看,诊断治疗过程可被视为一个循环过程,其中患者、医生和关系因素以及CAM的一般因素紧密交织。根据这一概念,CAM可用于初级保健中的广泛健康问题。然而,充足的时间和信任的医患关系对于使用CAM至关重要。由于经济压力不断增加,存在CAM被流程化的风险,即被拆分为单个流程并与医患关系脱钩。这将危及CAM在日常实践中的疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验