• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在为神经科学研究征得弱势患者同意方面的伦理问题。

Ethical issues in consenting vulnerable patients for neuroscience research.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Feb;25(2):205-10. doi: 10.1177/0269881109349838. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1177/0269881109349838
PMID:20093320
Abstract

Many subjects cannot give fully informed consent to take part in research by virtue of age or mental capacity. However, it is unacceptable to deny these patients involvement in research by virtue of a lack of capacity to consent to such research. Further, this would hinder the advancement of medical science and technologies that might ultimately benefit these patients. Conversely, it is as unacceptable to discriminate against these patients and their condition as it is to exploit them or expose them to undue risk. Neuroscientific research raises a number of specific ethical issues in this patient population, in particular issues of consent, potential benefits of research, management of incidental findings and the assignment of appropriate controls. This paper examines the dilemmas that surround such ethical issues, and demonstrates that various procedures including informed consent, deferred consent and consent by proxy can be used to consent patients in both the standard medical and research arenas. Researchers, clinicians and regulatory authorities must work together to understand the benefits, limitations, risks and obligations of any research study involving these patients in order to advance medical care.

摘要

许多受试者由于年龄或智力因素,无法完全知情同意参与研究。然而,由于缺乏同意参与此类研究的能力而拒绝这些患者参与研究是不可接受的。此外,这将阻碍医学科学和技术的进步,而这些进步最终可能使这些患者受益。相反,歧视这些患者及其病情,以及剥削或使他们面临不必要的风险,同样是不可接受的。神经科学研究在这一患者群体中引发了一些具体的伦理问题,特别是在同意、研究的潜在益处、偶然发现的管理以及适当对照的分配方面。本文探讨了这些伦理问题所带来的困境,并表明可以使用各种程序,包括知情同意、延期同意和代理同意,来同意标准医疗和研究领域的患者。研究人员、临床医生和监管机构必须共同努力,了解涉及这些患者的任何研究的益处、局限性、风险和义务,以便推进医疗保健。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues in consenting vulnerable patients for neuroscience research.在为神经科学研究征得弱势患者同意方面的伦理问题。
J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Feb;25(2):205-10. doi: 10.1177/0269881109349838. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
2
Disclosure issues in neuroscience research.神经科学研究中的披露问题。
Account Res. 2008 Oct-Dec;15(4):226-41. doi: 10.1080/08989620802388697.
3
The issue of consent in research that administers drugs of addiction to addicted persons.对成瘾者使用成瘾药物的研究中的知情同意问题。
Account Res. 2008 Oct-Dec;15(4):209-25. doi: 10.1080/08989620802388689.
4
Ethical issues in taking neuroscience research from bench to bedside.将神经科学研究从实验室应用到临床过程中的伦理问题。
Cerebrum. 2004 Fall;6(4):66-72.
5
The unique ethical challenges of conducting research in the rehabilitation medicine population.在康复医学人群中开展研究所面临的独特伦理挑战。
BMC Med Ethics. 2003 Jun 17;4:E2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-4-2.
6
Ethical issues in clinical research. Informed consent and risks versus benefits in the treatment of primary hypertension.临床研究中的伦理问题。原发性高血压治疗中的知情同意以及风险与获益
Nurs Clin North Am. 1989 Dec;24(4):1033-9.
7
The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--chapter 7: Informed consent and xenotransplantation clinical trials.国际异种移植协会关于开展1型糖尿病猪胰岛产品临床试验条件的共识声明——第7章:知情同意与异种移植临床试验
Xenotransplantation. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00546.x.
8
Ethical issues in forensic psychiatric research on mentally disordered offenders.论精神障碍罪犯法医精神病学研究中的伦理问题。
Bioethics. 2010 Jan;24(1):35-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01773.x.
9
Informed consent in clinical research: policies and practices in Singapore.临床研究中的知情同意:新加坡的政策与实践
J Biolaw Bus. 2003;6(1):65-75.
10
Physician duties in the conduct of human subject research.医生在人体研究中的职责。
Account Res. 2001;8(4):349-75. doi: 10.1080/08989620108573985.

引用本文的文献

1
"They were already inside my head to begin with": Trust, Translational Misconception, and Intraoperative Brain Research.“它们一开始就已经在我的头脑中了”:信任、转化误解和术中大脑研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):111-124. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2123869. Epub 2022 Sep 22.