Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Göttingen, Humboldtallee Göttingen, Germany.
Eur J Pain. 2010 Sep;14(8):864.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
Previous evaluations of the 20-item Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) were indicative of excessive redundancy of the measure. The aim of this study was to develop a shortened version of the NPAD (sf-NPAD) based on results of item-to-total-score correlations and factor analysis as published by the developers of the original NPAD. Two items with the highest item-to-total score correlation were selected per factor subscale with the exception of one factor consisting of only one item. This resulted in the selection of 9 items for the sf-NPAD. The sf-NPAD was validated in a separate sample of 448 neck pain patients from 15 general practices in the area of Göttingen/Germany. Participants completed the 20-item NPAD German version and gave additional sociodemographic and clinical information. Psychometric properties of the sf-NPAD were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, item-to-total-score correlation, and unrestricted principal factor analysis. Construct validity was evaluated by Pearson's r with clinical characteristics. Discriminative validity was examined by comparing differences between subgroups stratified by psychosocial characteristics using t-tests for mean scores. Cronbach's alpha of the sf-NPAD was 0.88. Item-to-total-scale correlations ranged between 0.628 and 0.815, and sf-NPAD items homogeneously loaded on a single factor. Correlation analysis showed high correlations with criterion variables. The sf-NPAD scores of patient subgroups were significantly different showing good discriminative validity. In conclusion, the sf-NPAD demonstrated good validity and internal consistency in this general practice setting. The abbreviated version may facilitate applicability of the scale in clinical and research settings.
先前对 20 项颈痛和残疾量表(NPAD)的评估表明,该测量方法存在过度冗余。本研究旨在根据原始 NPAD 开发者发表的项目与总分相关性和因子分析的结果,开发 NPAD 的缩短版(sf-NPAD)。每个因子亚量表选择与总分相关性最高的两个项目,但一个只有一个项目的因子除外。这导致选择了 9 个项目用于 sf-NPAD。sf-NPAD 在德国哥廷根地区的 15 家普通实践中对 448 名颈痛患者进行了验证。参与者完成了 20 项 NPAD 德文版本,并提供了额外的社会人口统计学和临床信息。使用 Cronbach's alpha、项目与总分相关性和无限制主因子分析评估 sf-NPAD 的心理测量特性。通过与临床特征的 Pearson r 评估结构效度。通过使用 t 检验比较按社会心理特征分层的亚组之间的差异来检查区分效度。sf-NPAD 的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.88。项目与总分相关性在 0.628 到 0.815 之间,sf-NPAD 项目均匀地加载在单个因子上。相关分析显示与标准变量高度相关。患者亚组的 sf-NPAD 评分存在显著差异,表明具有良好的区分效度。总之,sf-NPAD 在一般实践环境中表现出良好的有效性和内部一致性。缩短版可能会提高该量表在临床和研究环境中的适用性。