Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Campus Box 8132, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jan;98(1):17-23. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.008.
Is there a means of assessing research impact beyond citation analysis?
The case study took place at the Washington University School of Medicine Becker Medical Library.
This case study analyzed the research study process to identify indicators beyond citation count that demonstrate research impact.
The authors discovered a number of indicators that can be documented for assessment of research impact, as well as resources to locate evidence of impact. As a result of the project, the authors developed a model for assessment of research impact, the Becker Medical Library Model for Assessment of Research.
Assessment of research impact using traditional citation analysis alone is not a sufficient tool for assessing the impact of research findings, and it is not predictive of subsequent clinical applications resulting in meaningful health outcomes. The Becker Model can be used by both researchers and librarians to document research impact to supplement citation analysis.
除了引文分析之外,是否还有其他评估研究影响力的方法?
案例研究发生在华盛顿大学医学院 Becker 医学图书馆。
本案例研究分析了研究过程,以确定除引文数量以外的可以展示研究影响力的指标。
作者发现了许多可以记录下来评估研究影响力的指标,以及定位影响证据的资源。该项目的结果是,作者开发了一种评估研究影响力的模型,即 Becker 医学图书馆研究评估模型。
仅使用传统引文分析评估研究影响力不是评估研究成果影响力的充分工具,也不能预测随后导致有意义的健康结果的临床应用。研究人员和图书馆员都可以使用 Becker 模型来记录研究影响力,以补充引文分析。