The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS Med. 2010 Jan 19;7(1):e1000218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000218.
One of the criteria to objectively prioritize merozoite antigens for malaria vaccine development is the demonstration that naturally acquired antibodies are associated with protection from malaria. However, published evidence of the protective effect of these antibodies is conflicting.
We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies examining the association between anti-merozoite immunoglobin (Ig) G responses and incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Two independent researchers searched six databases and identified 33 studies that met predefined inclusion and quality criteria, including a rigorous definition of symptomatic malaria. We found that only five studies were performed outside sub-Saharan Africa and that there was a deficiency in studies investigating antibodies to leading vaccine candidates merozoite surface protein (MSP)-1(42) and erythrocyte binding antigen (EBA)-175. Meta-analyses of most-studied antigens were conducted to obtain summary estimates of the association between antibodies and incidence of P. falciparum malaria. The largest effect was observed with IgG to MSP-3 C terminus and MSP-1(19) (responders versus nonresponders, 54%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [33%-68%] and 18% [4%-30%] relative reduction in risk, respectively) and there was evidence of a dose-response relationship. A tendency towards protective risk ratios (RR<1) was also observed for individual study estimates for apical membrane antigen (AMA)-1 and glutamate-rich protein (GLURP)-R0. Pooled estimates showed limited evidence of a protective effect for antibodies to MSP-1 N-terminal regions or MSP-1-EGF (epidermal growth factor-like modules). There was no significant evidence for the protective effect for MSP-2 (responders versus nonresponders pooled RR, MSP-2(FC27) 0.82, 95% CI 0.62-1.08, p = 0.16 and MSP-2(3D7) 0.92, 95% CI 0.75-1.13, p = 0.43). Heterogeneity, in terms of clinical and methodological diversity between studies, was an important issue in the meta-analysis of IgG responses to merozoite antigens.
These findings are valuable for advancing vaccine development by providing evidence supporting merozoite antigens as targets of protective immunity in humans, and to help identify antigens that confer protection from malaria. Further prospective cohort studies that include a larger number of lead antigens and populations outside Africa are greatly needed to ensure generalizability of results. The reporting of results needs to be standardized to maximize comparability of studies. We therefore propose a set of guidelines to facilitate the uniform reporting of malaria immuno-epidemiology observational studies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
客观优先选择疟原虫抗原用于疟疾疫苗开发的标准之一是证明自然获得的抗体与疟疾的保护有关。然而,这些抗体的保护作用的已发表证据相互矛盾。
我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,前瞻性队列研究检查了抗疟原虫免疫球蛋白(IgG)对恶性疟原虫感染的相关性。两名独立的研究人员检索了六个数据库,并确定了 33 项符合预先设定的纳入和质量标准的研究,包括对有症状疟疾的严格定义。我们发现,只有五项研究是在撒哈拉以南非洲以外进行的,而且在研究针对主要疫苗候选物恶性疟原虫表面蛋白(MSP)-1(42)和红细胞结合抗原(EBA)-175 的抗体方面存在缺陷。对大多数研究抗原进行了荟萃分析,以获得抗体与恶性疟原虫感染之间相关性的综合估计。最大的效果是与 MSP-3 末端和 MSP-1(19)的 IgG 观察到(反应者与非反应者相比,分别为 54%[33%-68%]和 18%[4%-30%]的风险相对降低),并且存在剂量-反应关系的证据。也观察到顶端膜抗原(AMA)-1 和谷氨酸丰富蛋白(GLURP)-R0 的个体研究估计值有保护性风险比(RR<1)的趋势。合并估计值显示,MSP-1 N 末端区域或 MSP-1-EGF(表皮生长因子样模块)的抗体对保护作用的证据有限。MSP-2(反应者与非反应者合并 RR,MSP-2(FC27)0.82[62%-1.08],p=0.16 和 MSP-2(3D7)0.92[75%-1.13],p=0.43)的保护性效应没有显著证据。荟萃分析中,由于研究之间临床和方法学的多样性,抗体对恶性疟原虫抗原的反应存在异质性,这是一个重要问题。
这些发现对于推进疫苗开发具有重要价值,为人类提供了支持恶性疟原虫抗原作为保护性免疫靶标的证据,并有助于确定可预防疟疾的抗原。需要进行更多的包括非洲以外的更多主要抗原和人群的前瞻性队列研究,以确保结果的普遍性。结果的报告需要标准化,以最大限度地提高研究的可比性。因此,我们提出了一套指导方针,以促进疟疾免疫流行病学观察研究的统一报告。请稍后在文章中查看编辑摘要。