Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 May;17(5):1267-77. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0914-6. Epub 2010 Jan 23.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging system for gastric cancer incorporates the absolute number of metastatic lymph nodes (N status) and is optimally used when >or=15 nodes are examined. The ratio of metastatic to examined nodes (N ratio) is an effective prognostic tool, but has not been examined in Western patients undergoing primarily D1 lymphadenectomy.
Two hundred and fifty seven patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent gastric resection between 1995 and 2005 at our institution were examined. Novel N ratio intervals were determined using the best cutoff approach (Nr0: N ratio = 0 and >or=15 nodes examined; Nr1: 0 <or= N ratio <or= 0.3; Nr2: 0.3 < N ratio <or= 0.7; and Nr3: N ratio > 0.7). Overall survival was examined according to N status and N ratio.
83% of patients underwent D1 lymphadenectomy with a median of 14 lymph nodes examined. Overall survival stratified by N status was significantly different in patients with <15 nodes examined compared with those with >or=15 nodes examined. When we stratified by N ratio intervals, there was no significant difference in overall survival in patients with <15 versus >or= 15 nodes examined. On multivariate analysis, N ratio but not N status was retained as an independent prognostic factor.
The use of N status for staging patients undergoing primarily D1 lymphadenectomy results in significant stage migration due to varying numbers of nodes examined. Use of N ratio reduces stage migration and may be a more reliable method of staging these patients.
美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟(AJCC/UICC)胃癌分期系统纳入了转移淋巴结的绝对数量(N 分期),当检查的淋巴结数大于等于 15 个时,该系统的效果最佳。转移淋巴结与检查淋巴结的比值(N 比值)是一种有效的预后工具,但尚未在接受主要 D1 淋巴结清扫术的西方患者中进行过检查。
我们对 1995 年至 2005 年期间在我院接受胃切除术的 257 例胃腺癌患者进行了检查。使用最佳截断值法(Nr0:N 比值=0,且检查的淋巴结数大于等于 15;Nr1:0≤N 比值<0.3;Nr2:0.3≤N 比值<0.7;Nr3:N 比值>0.7)确定新的 N 比值间隔。根据 N 分期和 N 比值检查总生存率。
83%的患者接受了 D1 淋巴结清扫术,中位数为 14 个淋巴结被检查。与检查淋巴结数大于等于 15 个的患者相比,检查淋巴结数小于 15 个的患者 N 分期的总生存率有显著差异。当我们按 N 比值间隔分层时,在检查淋巴结数小于 15 个与大于等于 15 个的患者之间,总生存率没有显著差异。多因素分析显示,N 比值而不是 N 分期是独立的预后因素。
对于接受主要 D1 淋巴结清扫术的患者,使用 N 分期会因检查的淋巴结数量不同而导致显著的分期迁移。使用 N 比值可减少分期迁移,可能是一种更可靠的分期方法。