• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超翼舱门位置对小型运输飞机撤离的影响。

The effect of overwing hatch placement on evacuation from smaller transport aircraft.

机构信息

Department of Systems Engineering and Human Factors, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford, UK.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2010 Feb;53(2):286-93. doi: 10.1080/00140131003621996.

DOI:10.1080/00140131003621996
PMID:20099181
Abstract

Overwing exits are installed on a number of smaller transport aircraft. With a traditional overwing exit, once released, the hatch is not attached to the fuselage and will fall into the cabin. To operate, the hatch has to be brought inwards, manoeuvred and placed in a location where it does not obstruct egress. Accidents and experimental studies have shown that the hatch is not always disposed of into an appropriate location. Evacuation trials from a smaller transport aircraft cabin were conducted. The placement of the exit hatch was manipulated. The results indicated that hatch placement had a significant effect on passenger evacuation rates from a smaller transport aircraft, with the internal placement tested resulting in slower evacuation rates. The study has highlighted the importance of operators disposing of the hatch into a location whereby it does not impede egress. One way to ensure this would be the installation of an automatically disposed hatch. Statement of Relevance: It is important that all occupants can evacuate an aircraft rapidly if required. The influence of overwing hatch placement on evacuation from smaller transport aircraft was addressed Evacuation trials concluded that an inappropriately placed hatch can negatively influence evacuation rates. Improvements to exit design and passenger education were suggested.

摘要

许多小型运输飞机上都安装了超翼出口。传统的超翼出口一旦释放,舱门就不会与机身相连,而是会掉入机舱内。为了操作,舱门必须向内移动、操纵并放置在不阻碍出口的位置。事故和实验研究表明,舱门并非总是被放置在适当的位置。从较小的运输飞机机舱进行了撤离试验。操纵出口舱门的位置。结果表明,舱门的位置对较小的运输飞机上乘客的撤离速度有显著影响,内部位置测试导致撤离速度较慢。该研究强调了操作人员将舱门放置在不妨碍出口的位置的重要性。确保这一点的一种方法是安装自动处置的舱门。相关性声明:如果需要,所有乘客都能迅速从飞机上撤离是很重要的。超翼舱门位置对小型运输飞机撤离的影响得到了研究。撤离试验得出结论,放置不当的舱门可能会对撤离速度产生负面影响。建议改进出口设计和乘客教育。

相似文献

1
The effect of overwing hatch placement on evacuation from smaller transport aircraft.超翼舱门位置对小型运输飞机撤离的影响。
Ergonomics. 2010 Feb;53(2):286-93. doi: 10.1080/00140131003621996.
2
The effect of overwing hatch placement on evacuation from smaller transport aircraft.机翼上方舱门位置对小型运输机撤离的影响。
Ergonomics. 2009 Aug;52(8):931-8. doi: 10.1080/00140130902759204.
3
Cabin safety and emergency evacuation: passenger experience of flight CI-120 accident.客舱安全与紧急撤离:CI-120 航班事故中的乘客体验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):1049-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.009. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
4
The basis for the development of a fuselage evacuation time for a ditched helicopter.直升机迫降时机身撤离时间的制定依据。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001 Jun;72(6):553-61.
5
Helicopter door and window jettison mechanisms for underwater escape: ergonomic confusion!用于水下逃生的直升机舱门和窗户抛弃装置:人体工程学上的困惑!
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997 Sep;68(9):844-57.
6
Directly measured cabin pressure conditions during Boeing 747-400 commercial aircraft flights.波音747 - 400型商用飞机飞行过程中直接测量的客舱压力状况。
Respirology. 2007 Jul;12(4):511-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2007.01104.x.
7
Increasing evacuation flow through school bus emergency roof hatches.增加校车紧急屋顶出口的疏散流量。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103178. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103178. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
8
Homebuilt aircraft crashes.自制飞机坠毁。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Jun;70(6):543-7.
9
Improving the crashworthiness of general aviation aircraft by crash injury investigations.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1982 Apr;53(4):319-25.
10
Options for liferaft entry after helicopter ditching.直升机迫降后登上救生筏的方法。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998 Aug;69(8):743-9.