Suppr超能文献

脓毒症免疫抑制期的特征与调控。

Characterization and modulation of the immunosuppressive phase of sepsis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

出版信息

Infect Immun. 2010 Apr;78(4):1582-92. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01213-09. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

Abstract

Sepsis continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Studies of patients and animal models have revealed that changes in the immune response during sepsis play a decisive role in the outcome. Using a clinically relevant two-hit model of sepsis, i.e., cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) followed by the induction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia, we characterized the host immune response. Second, AS101 [ammonium trichloro(dioxoethylene-o,o')tellurate], a compound that blocks interleukin 10 (IL-10), a key mediator of immunosuppression in sepsis, was tested for its ability to reverse immunoparalysis and improve survival. Mice subjected to pneumonia following CLP had different survival rates depending upon the timing of the secondary injury. Animals challenged with P. aeruginosa at 4 days post-CLP had approximately 40% survival, whereas animals challenged at 7 days had 85% survival. This improvement in survival was associated with decreased lymphocyte apoptosis, restoration of innate cell populations, increased proinflammatory cytokines, and restoration of gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) production by stimulated splenocytes. These animals also showed significantly less P. aeruginosa growth from blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Importantly, AS101 improved survival after secondary injury 4 days following CLP. This increased survival was associated with many of the same findings observed in the 7-day group, i.e., restoration of IFN-gamma production, increased proinflammatory cytokines, and decreased bacterial growth. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that immunosuppression following initial septic insult increases susceptibility to secondary infection. However, by 7 days post-CLP, the host's immune system has recovered sufficiently to mount an effective immune response. Modulation of the immunosuppressive phase of sepsis may aid in the development of new therapeutic strategies.

摘要

脓毒症仍然导致重症患者出现严重的发病率和死亡率。对患者和动物模型的研究表明,脓毒症期间免疫反应的变化在结局中起着决定性作用。我们使用临床相关的两次打击脓毒症模型,即盲肠结扎和穿刺 (CLP) 后诱导铜绿假单胞菌肺炎,来描述宿主的免疫反应。其次,AS101[三氯(二氧乙撑-o,o')碲酸铵],一种阻断白细胞介素 10 (IL-10) 的化合物,IL-10 是脓毒症中免疫抑制的关键介质,其逆转免疫麻痹和提高存活率的能力也进行了测试。CLP 后发生肺炎的小鼠的存活率因二次损伤的时间而异。在 CLP 后 4 天接受铜绿假单胞菌挑战的动物的存活率约为 40%,而在 7 天接受挑战的动物的存活率为 85%。这种存活率的提高与淋巴细胞凋亡减少、固有细胞群恢复、促炎细胞因子增加以及刺激脾细胞产生γ干扰素 (IFN-γ) 有关。这些动物的血液和支气管肺泡灌洗液中的铜绿假单胞菌生长也明显减少。重要的是,AS101 改善了 CLP 后 4 天二次损伤后的存活率。这种存活率的提高与在 7 天组中观察到的许多相同发现有关,即 IFN-γ 产生的恢复、促炎细胞因子的增加和细菌生长的减少。总之,这些研究表明,初次脓毒症损伤后的免疫抑制会增加对二次感染的易感性。然而,在 CLP 后 7 天,宿主的免疫系统已经恢复到足以产生有效免疫反应的程度。调节脓毒症的免疫抑制阶段可能有助于开发新的治疗策略。

相似文献

1
Characterization and modulation of the immunosuppressive phase of sepsis.
Infect Immun. 2010 Apr;78(4):1582-92. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01213-09. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
2
Increased susceptibility to Candida infection following cecal ligation and puncture.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011 Oct 14;414(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.017. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
4
Ethyl pyruvate reverses development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia during sepsis-induced immunosuppression.
Int Immunopharmacol. 2017 Nov;52:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
IL-15 prevents apoptosis, reverses innate and adaptive immune dysfunction, and improves survival in sepsis.
J Immunol. 2010 Feb 1;184(3):1401-9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902307. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
8
Loss of suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) gene reverses sepsis-induced inhibition of lung host defense in mice.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr 1;183(7):932-40. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201006-0934OC. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
10
[Reproduction of a model of "two-hit" sepsis model with complication of pneumonia in rat].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Oct;27(10):805-10.

引用本文的文献

4
Immunosuppression in Sepsis: Biomarkers and Specialized Pro-Resolving Mediators.
Biomedicines. 2024 Jan 13;12(1):175. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12010175.
5
Sepsis-induced changes in differentiation, maintenance, and function of memory CD8 T cell subsets.
Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 23;14:1130009. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1130009. eCollection 2023.
7
Extracorporeal immune cell therapy of sepsis: ex vivo results.
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2022 Jun 16;10(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40635-022-00453-8.
8
Biomarker combinations in predicting sepsis in hospitalized children with fever.
BMC Pediatr. 2022 May 12;22(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03285-3.
9
A Paradigm Gap in Host-Pathogen Interaction Studies: Lesson from the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1353:47-70. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85113-2_3.
10
Immune Modulation and Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Sepsis-induced Immunosuppression: A Pilot Study.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan;26(1):53-61. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24079.

本文引用的文献

1
The sepsis seesaw: tilting toward immunosuppression.
Nat Med. 2009 May;15(5):496-7. doi: 10.1038/nm0509-496.
2
Sepsis-induced human lymphocyte apoptosis and cytokine production in "humanized" mice.
J Leukoc Biol. 2009 Aug;86(2):219-27. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1008615. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
4
Harmful molecular mechanisms in sepsis.
Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 Oct;8(10):776-87. doi: 10.1038/nri2402.
5
Pathophysiology of sepsis.
Am J Pathol. 2007 May;170(5):1435-44. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060872.
6
Pneumonia after cecal ligation and puncture: a clinically relevant "two-hit" model of sepsis.
Shock. 2006 Dec;26(6):565-70. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000235130.82363.ed.
7
Management of sepsis.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1699-713. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043632.
8
Apoptosis and caspases regulate death and inflammation in sepsis.
Nat Rev Immunol. 2006 Nov;6(11):813-22. doi: 10.1038/nri1943. Epub 2006 Oct 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验