• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速认知筛查测试在识别轻度认知障碍中的应用研究。

Application study of quick cognitive screening test in identifying mild cognitive impairment.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.

出版信息

Neurosci Bull. 2010 Feb;26(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s12264-010-0816-4.

DOI:10.1007/s12264-010-0816-4
PMID:20101272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5560380/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether quick cognitive screening test (QCST) could quickly identify mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

METHODS

QCST and a full set of standardized neuropsychological tests, including mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) were performed. A total number of 121 cases of MCI [41 cases of amnestic MCI-single domain (aMCI-s); 44 of amnestic MCI-multiple domain (aMCI-m); 36 of nonamnestic MCI (naMCI)], 79 cases of mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 186 healthy elderly volunteers were employed in the present study. All the participants (55-85 years old) had an educational level no less than 5 years. QCST subtests included word list recall, naming test, animal fluency test, similarity test, color trail-1min, clock drawing test, finger construction test, and digit span test. The total score of QCST was 90 points, 10 points for each index of subtests.

RESULTS

The total scores of QCST in MCI, AD and the control groups were (58.13+/-8.18), (44.53+/-10.54) and (72.92+/-6.85) points, respectively. According to the educational level, the cut off scores of participants with an educational level of 5-8 years, 9-12 years and more than 13 years were 63, 65 and 68 points, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of QCST in detection of MCI were 87.6% (85.7% for aMCI-s, 90.1% for aMCI-m and 89.5% for naMCI) and 84.3%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.923 (95% CI: 0.892-0.953). Delayed memory, color trail-1min and similarity test could help distinguish between aMCI and naMCI.

CONCLUSION

QCST may have a good sensitivity and specificity for MCI detection, which warrants its further clinical application.

摘要

目的

评估快速认知筛查测试(QCST)是否能快速识别轻度认知障碍(MCI)。

方法

进行 QCST 和一套标准化神经心理学测试,包括简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)。本研究共纳入 121 例 MCI 患者[41 例单纯性遗忘型 MCI(aMCI-s);44 例多领域遗忘型 MCI(aMCI-m);36 例非遗忘型 MCI(naMCI)]、79 例轻度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者和 186 名健康老年人志愿者。所有参与者(55-85 岁)的教育水平均不少于 5 年。QCST 子测验包括单词回忆、命名测验、动物流畅性测验、相似性测验、1 分钟色连线测验、画钟测验、手指构造测验和数字广度测验。QCST 的总分为 90 分,每个子测验的指标得分为 10 分。

结果

MCI、AD 和对照组的 QCST 总分分别为(58.13+/-8.18)、(44.53+/-10.54)和(72.92+/-6.85)分。根据教育水平,教育年限为 5-8 年、9-12 年和超过 13 年的参与者的截断分数分别为 63、65 和 68 分。QCST 检测 MCI 的敏感性和特异性分别为 87.6%(aMCI-s 为 85.7%,aMCI-m 为 90.1%,naMCI 为 89.5%)和 84.3%。曲线下面积为 0.923(95%CI:0.892-0.953)。延迟记忆、1 分钟色连线测验和相似性测验有助于区分 aMCI 和 naMCI。

结论

QCST 对 MCI 的检测可能具有较好的敏感性和特异性,值得进一步临床应用。

相似文献

1
Application study of quick cognitive screening test in identifying mild cognitive impairment.快速认知筛查测试在识别轻度认知障碍中的应用研究。
Neurosci Bull. 2010 Feb;26(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s12264-010-0816-4.
2
A subtest analysis of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): which subtests can best discriminate between healthy controls, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease?蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的子测验分析:哪些子测验能最佳区分健康对照、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病?
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 May;28(5):825-32. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001982. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
3
Enhanced cued recall and clock drawing test performances differ in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive dysfunction.增强提示回忆和时钟绘图测试表现不同,帕金森病和阿尔茨海默病相关认知功能障碍。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Nov;15(9):688-91. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 May 15.
4
The role of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and its memory tasks for detecting mild cognitive impairment.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)及其记忆任务在检测轻度认知障碍中的作用。
Neurol Sci. 2018 Jun;39(6):1029-1034. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3319-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
5
Prevalence and prognostic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer's disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: a prospective cohort study.DESCRIPA研究中主观认知障碍或轻度认知障碍患者脑脊液阿尔茨海默病病理标志物的患病率及预后价值:一项前瞻性队列研究
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Jul;8(7):619-27. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70139-5. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
6
CERAD test performances in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.遗忘型轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中的CERAD测试表现。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2005 Mar;111(3):172-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00380.x.
7
Significant correlation between cerebral hypoperfusion and neuropsychological assessment scores of patients with mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍患者脑灌注不足与神经心理学评估分数之间存在显著相关性。
Nucl Med Commun. 2012 Aug;33(8):848-58. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835587f8.
8
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA):一种用于轻度认知障碍的简易筛查工具。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
9
Clinical predictors of progression to Alzheimer disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.遗忘型轻度认知障碍进展为阿尔茨海默病的临床预测因素。
Neurology. 2007 May 8;68(19):1588-95. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000258542.58725.4c. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
10
Olfactory identification in amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment and its neuropsychological correlates.遗忘型和非遗忘型轻度认知障碍的嗅觉识别及其神经心理学相关性。
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Feb 15;349(1-2):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brief Cognitive Instruments to Evaluate Suspected Dementia in Chinese-Speaking Populations.用于评估华语人群疑似痴呆症的简短认知工具的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2023 Sep 1;7(1):973-987. doi: 10.3233/ADR-230024. eCollection 2023.
2
Neuropsychological Features in Patients with General Paresis of the Insane at an Early Stage.早期精神错乱麻痹患者的神经心理学特征。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Dec 9;28:e938316. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938316.
3
The Effect and Mechanism of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Episodic Memory in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment.经颅直流电刺激对轻度认知障碍患者情景记忆的影响及机制
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 17;16:811403. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.811403. eCollection 2022.
4
Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the detection of dementia.蒙特利尔认知评估用于痴呆的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 13;7(7):CD010775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010775.pub3.
5
Brain-predicted age difference score is related to specific cognitive functions: a multi-site replication analysis.脑预测年龄差异分数与特定认知功能相关:一项多中心重复分析。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Feb;15(1):327-345. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00260-3.
6
Standardizing the Assessment of Macular Pigment Using a Dual-Wavelength Autofluorescence Technique.使用双波长自发荧光技术标准化黄斑色素评估
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Dec 18;8(6):41. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.6.41. eCollection 2019 Nov.
7
A 58-Year Old Male with Cognitive Deteriorations Caused by Septum Pellucidum Cyst: A Case Report.一名58岁男性因透明隔囊肿导致认知功能减退:病例报告
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Sep 13;9:299. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00299. eCollection 2017.
8
A homozygous missense variant in HSD17B4 identified in a consanguineous Chinese Han family with type II Perrault syndrome.在一个患II型佩罗特综合征的中国汉族近亲家庭中鉴定出HSD17B4基因的纯合错义变异。
BMC Med Genet. 2017 Aug 23;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12881-017-0453-0.
9
The heterozygous A53T mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene in a Chinese Han patient with Parkinson disease: case report and literature review.一名中国汉族帕金森病患者α-突触核蛋白基因杂合A53T突变:病例报告及文献复习
J Neurol. 2016 Oct;263(10):1984-92. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8213-1. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
10
Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.用于诊断阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症的蒙特利尔认知评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010775.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison study of mild cognitive impairment with 3 memory tests among Chinese individuals.一项针对中国人群轻度认知障碍的 3 种记忆测试的对比研究。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Jul-Sep;23(3):253-9. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181999e92.
2
CAMcog as a screening tool for diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in a Brazilian clinical sample of moderate to high education.在巴西中等至高学历临床样本中,CAMcog作为轻度认知障碍和痴呆症诊断的筛查工具。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;23(11):1127-33. doi: 10.1002/gps.2038.
3
Conversion from subtypes of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer dementia.轻度认知障碍亚型向阿尔茨海默病痴呆的转化。
Neurology. 2007 Jan 23;68(4):288-91. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252358.03285.9d.
4
Mild cognitive impairment: long-term course of four clinical subtypes.轻度认知障碍:四种临床亚型的长期病程
Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2176-85. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249117.23318.e1.
5
Screening for amnestic mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease with M@T (Memory Alteration Test) in the primary care population.在基层医疗人群中使用M@T(记忆改变测试)筛查遗忘型轻度认知障碍和早期阿尔茨海默病。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;22(4):294-304. doi: 10.1002/gps.1672.
6
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in medical practice: a critical review of the concept and new diagnostic procedure. Report of the MCI Working Group of the European Consortium on Alzheimer's Disease.医学实践中的轻度认知障碍(MCI):对概念及新诊断程序的批判性综述。欧洲阿尔茨海默病联盟MCI工作组报告
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;77(6):714-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.085332. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
7
Complex activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment: conceptual and diagnostic issues.轻度认知障碍患者的复杂日常生活活动:概念与诊断问题
Age Ageing. 2006 May;35(3):240-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afj054. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
8
The Short Cognitive Performance Test (SKT): a preliminary study of its psychometric properties in Brazil.简短认知表现测试(SKT):在巴西对其心理测量特性的初步研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2006 Mar;18(1):121-33. doi: 10.1017/S1041610205002577. Epub 2005 Oct 28.
9
VITA: subtypes of mild cognitive impairment in a community-based cohort at the age of 75 years.VITA:75岁社区队列中轻度认知障碍的亚型
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 May;20(5):452-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.1311.
10
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA):一种用于轻度认知障碍的简易筛查工具。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.